(REPRINTED WITH ADOPTED AMENDMENTS) " FIRST REPRINT A.C.R. 11" Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 11--Committee on Elections and Procedures February 23, 1995 _____________ Referred to Committee on Elections and Procedures SUMMARY--Amends Joint Rules of the Senate and Assembly to provide for enforcement of requirement that all meetings of legislative committees be open to public. (BDR R-442) EXPLANATION--Matter in italics is new; matter in bra ckets [ ] is material to be omitted. ASSEMBLY CONCURRENT RESOLUTION--Amending the Joint Rules of the Senate and Assembly for the 68th legislative session to provide for the enforcement of the requirement that all meetings of legislative committees be open to the public. RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, THE SENATE CONCURRING, That the Joint Rules of the Senate and Assembly as adopted by the 68th session of the Legislature are amended by the following addition:\ 20 Violations of Requirement of Open Committee Meetings. \\1. A complaint which alleges a violation or a prospective violation of: (a) The requirement in section 15 of article 4 of the constitution of the State of Nevada that all meetings of legislative committees be open to the public; or (b) The rules concerning meetings of legislative committees that are applicable to the House in which a meeting is held, must be in writing and signed by the person making the allegation. 2. The complaint must be filed with the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau not later than 3 legislative days after the alleged violation. The Director shall review the complaint to determine whether it alleges facts which, if true, would constitute a violation of the constitutional requirement that meetings of legislative committees be open to the public or of the rules concerning meetings of legislative committees that are applicable to the House in which the meeting was held. 3. If the Director determines that the complaint does not allege facts which, if true, would constitute a violation, he shall return the complaint to the person who filed the complaint and indicate that the complaint is not within the purview of this rule. The determination of the Director may be appealed to the Speakers of the Assembly, if the complaint involves an Assembly committee, or the Majority Leader of the Senate, if the complaint involves a Senate committee. 4. If the Director determines that the complaint alleges facts which, if true, would constitute a violation, or if upon appeal the Speakers or the Majority Leader so determine, the Director shall transmit a copy of the complaint, within 1 legislative day after the determination, to the committee responsible for hearing the complaint and the legislator against whom the complaint was filed. 5. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Committee on Elections and Procedures shall hear a complaint which alleges a violation by an Assemblyman. If the complaint alleges a violation by the Committee on Elections and Procedures, the complaint must be heard by a committee consisting of the Speakers, Democrat Floor Leader and Republican Floor Leader of the Assembly or their designees. 6. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Committee on Legislative Affairs and Operations shall hear a complaint which alleges a violation by a Senator. If the complaint alleges a violation by the Committee on Legislative Affairs and Operations, the complaint must be heard by a committee consisting of the President pro Tem, Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the Senate or their designees. 7. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 8, a hearing must be held as soon as practicable after the filing of the complaint. The complainant and the legislator against whom the complaint was filed may present the testimony of witnesses and other evidence at the hearing. If oral statements are made at the hearing, they must be made under oath. Strict rules of evidence do not apply at the hearing. 8. If the complaint alleges only a violation of the rules concerning meetings of legislative committees, a hearing must not be held and no further action may be taken if the legislator against whom the complaint was filed: (a) Takes corrective action before a meeting of a committee is held in violation of the rules; or (b) Acknowledges in writing a violation of the rules and agrees to refrain from violating the rules in the future. 9. If the committee hearing a complaint determines that a meeting has been held in violation of the requirement that all meetings of legislative committees be open to the public or of the rules concerning meetings of legislative committees that are applicable to the House in which the meeting was held, the committee shall determine the appropriate remedy for the violation. In determining an appropriate remedy, the committee shall consider the severity of the violation, whether previous violations have occurred, and the degree of harm resulting from the violation. The committee may: (a) Issue a letter of reprimand or take other punitive measures; (b) Require that another hearing be conducted on any issue or legislation heard or considered at the meeting in question, or that some other remedial action be taken; or (c) If the violation was minor and no harm is shown to have resulted therefrom, determine that no action is necessary to remedy the violation and no punishment is appropriate under the circumstances. The committee shall notify the legislator against whom the complaint was filed of its proposed ruling before taking any action on that ruling. 10. If the legislator against whom the complaint was filed objects to the proposed ruling of the committee, he may appeal the matter to the House for its resolution of the complaint by filing a notice of appeal with the Chief Clerk of the Assembly or the Secretary of the Senate within 1 legislative day after being notified of the proposed ruling. If the legislator does not file a notice of appeal within the time allowed, the ruling of the committee becomes final and the committee shall take the action proposed. 11. The filing of a complaint pursuant to this rule does not prevent any action from being taken with respect to legislation considered at the meeting at which the alleged violation occurred. A determination pursuant to subsection 9 that a violation has occurred does not affect the validity of any legislation heard or considered at the meeting in question. -30-