NEVADA LEGISLATURE
Sixty-ninth Session, 1997
_______________
SENATE DAILY JOURNAL
_______________
THE SEVENTY-FOURTH DAY
_______________
Carson City (Thursday), April 3, 1997
Senate called to order at 10:39 a.m.
President Hammargren presiding.
Roll called.
All present.
Prayer by the Chaplain, Wallace R. Keller, First Counselor to the President of the Carson City Stake, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.
Our kind and wise Father in Heaven, we approach Thee in prayer this day to express our gratitude and thanks to Thee for our blessings. We thank Thee for the beauty of the earth, especially during this spring season. We thank Thee for this great nation in which we live and for the freedoms which we enjoy. We express our love for the men and women who have given of their time, talents, energies and even their lives to preserve these eternal values. We thank Thee for the beautiful natural resources of this state and pray that we will be wise stewards of them. Today, my dear Father, we pray for Thy Spirit to prevail upon those who will participate in the agenda of this day that they will be blessed with a spirit of cooperation, that their minds will be clear, and that they will do Thy will respecting the decisions which will be made today. We pray for the courage to do what is best and right for the good of the citizens of this state. In conclusion, we pray a special blessing to be upon our youth that they will be taught in their homes to be strong and resist the evil influences of drugs, sex and gangs. Once again, we express our love for Thee and place our trust in Thy hands. In the name of Jesus Christ.
Amen.
Pledge of allegiance to the Flag.
Senator Raggio moved that further reading of the Journal be dispensed with, and the President and Secretary be authorized to make the necessary corrections and additions.
Motion carried.
REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
Mr. President:
Your Committee on Finance, to which were referred Senate Bills Nos. 23, 70, 71, 173, 175, has had the same under consideration, and begs leave to report the same back with the recommendation: Do pass.
William J. Raggio,
Chairman
MESSAGES FROM THE ASSEMBLY
Assembly Chamber, Carson City, April 2, 1997
To the Honorable the Senate:
I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Assembly on this day passed Assembly Bill No. 188.
Also, I have the honor to inform your honorable body that the Assembly on this day passed, as amended, Assembly Bills Nos. 213, 250.
Jacqueline Sneddon
Assistant Chief Clerk of the Assembly
MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND NOTICES
By Senators Schneider, Adler, Augustine, Coffin, Jacobsen, James, Mathews, McGinness, Neal, O'Connell, O'Donnell, Porter, Raggio, Rawson, Regan, Rhoads, Shaffer, Titus, Townsend, Washington and Wiener:
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 24--Designating April 3, 1997, as Nevada REALTORS® Day.
Whereas, The Nevada Legislature recognizes the importance of the service REALTORS® provide to the residents of this state; and
Whereas, There are approximately 7,000 REALTORS® working in the State of Nevada; and
Whereas, Every legislative session laws are enacted that directly involve the interests and rights of property owners and the duties of REALTORS® when selling property in Nevada; and
Whereas, It is imperative that the views of property owners as well as REALTORS® are known when considering changes to current laws that will affect participants in the transfer of real estate; and
Whereas, On April 3, 1997, REALTORS® from the State of Nevada will meet with members of this Legislature to give their insight into proposed changes in the laws concerning real estate; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate of the State of Nevada, the Assembly Concurring, That the members of the 69th Session of the Nevada Legislature hereby express their appreciation of and commend the REALTORS® of Nevada for their support and involvement in the legislative process as they continue to offer their insight to ensure that the laws which are incorporated into the Nevada Revised Statutes will have a positive impact on the residents of the State of Nevada; and be it further
Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate prepare and transmit a copy of this resolution to the Nevada Association of REALTORS®
Remarks by Senator Schneider.
Senator Schneider requested that his remarks be entered in the Journal.
Thank you, Mr. President. Today is Realtor Day here in Nevada. With me, I have the President of the Realtors, Mary McIntosh and past President of the State Association of Realtors, Jack Woodcock. As you know, the realtors handle the largest investment in everybody's life. They handle the sale of their homes which is the largest investment for most people. They handle all transactions of real property in this state. It is the biggest business in this state on an ongoing basis. Just add up the value of real estate transacted by realtors every year and I know that outstrips the gaming revenue that we have in this state.
Senator Schneider moved the adoption of the resolution.
Resolution adopted.
Senator Schneider moved that all rules be suspended and that Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 24 be immediately transmitted to the Assembly.
Motion carried.
INTRODUCTION, FIRST READING AND REFERENCE
By the Committee on Government Affairs:
Senate Bill No. 262--An Act relating to local government; revising provisions governing the filling of vacancies in certain county and township offices; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator O'Connell moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Government Affairs.
Motion carried.
By the Committee on Government Affairs:
Senate Bill No. 263--An Act relating to state personnel; authorizing the state controller to establish a program allowing state officers and employees to purchase computer software and hardware for their personal use utilizing the purchasing and contracting authority of this state and deductions from payroll; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator O'Connell moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Government Affairs.
Motion carried.
By Senators Titus and Wiener:
Senate Bill No. 264--An Act relating to crimes; providing an enhanced penalty for the intimidation, assault or battery of a person who operates a vehicle as part of a public mass transportation system; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator Titus moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Motion carried.
By Senators Titus, Adler, Coffin, Mathews, Neal, O'Donnell, Porter, Regan, Schneider, Shaffer and Wiener:
Senate Bill No. 265--An Act relating to crimes; increasing the penalty for certain crimes related to the unauthorized use of a telephone to a felony; making other various changes to such crimes; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator Titus moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Motion carried.
By Senators Titus and Wiener:
Senate Bill No. 266--An Act relating to hazardous materials; revising provisions governing highly hazardous substances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator Titus moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Motion carried.
By Senator Augustine:
Senate Bill No. 267--An Act relating to financial institutions; revising the provisions governing the closure of certain financial institutions on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays; authorizing the commissioner of financial institutions to waive or modify Nevada law under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator Augustine moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor.
Motion carried.
By Senators Shaffer, Schneider, Titus, Regan, Coffin and Townsend:
Senate Bill No. 268--An Act relating to real property; providing a lien for a real estate broker upon commercial real estate; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Senator Shaffer moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Commerce and Labor.
Motion carried.
Assembly Bill No. 188.
Senator Rawson moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Government Affairs.
Motion carried.
Assembly Bill No. 213.
Senator Rawson moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Government Affairs.
Motion carried.
Assembly Bill No. 250.
Senator Rawson moved that the bill be referred to the Committee on Government Affairs.
Motion carried.
SECOND READING AND AMENDMENT
Senate Bill No. 5.
Bill read second time.
The following amendment was proposed by the Committee on Judiciary:
Amendment No. 10.
Amend the bill as a whole by deleting sections 1 through 12 and adding new sections designated sections 1 through 13 and the text of the repealed section, following the enacting clause, to read as follows:
"Section 1 NRS 201.195 is hereby amended to read as follows:
201.195 1. A person who incites, entices or solicits a minor to engage in acts which constitute the infamous crime against nature:
(a) If the minor actually engaged in such acts as a result, is guilty of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.
(b) If the minor did not engage in such acts:
(1) For the first offense, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(2) For any subsequent offense, is guilty of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.
2. [A person convicted of violating any of the provisions of subsection 1 may not be:
(a) Paroled unless a board consisting of:
(1) The administrator of the mental hygiene and mental retardation division of the department of human resources or his designee;
(2) The director of the department of prisons or his designee; and
(3) A psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada,
certifies that the person so convicted was under observation while confined in an institution of the department of prisons and is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
(b) Released on probation unless a psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada certifies that the person so convicted is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
3.] As used in this section, the "infamous crime against nature" means anal intercourse, cunnilingus or fellatio between natural persons of the same sex. Any sexual penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the infamous crime against nature.
Sec. 2 NRS 201.210 is hereby amended to read as follows:
201.210 1. A person who commits any act of open or gross lewdness is guilty:
(a) For the first offense, of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) For any subsequent offense, of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.
2. [A person convicted of violating the provisions of subsection 1 must not be:
(a) Paroled unless a board consisting of:
(1) The administrator of the mental hygiene and mental retardation division of the department of human resources;
(2) The director of the department of prisons; and
(3) A psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada,
certifies that the person so convicted was under observation while confined in an institution of the department of prisons and is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others. For the purposes of this paragraph, the administrator and the director may each designate a person to represent him on the board.
(b) Released on probation unless a psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada certifies that the person so convicted is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
3.] For the purposes of this section, the breast feeding of a child by the child's mother does not constitute an act of open or gross lewdness.
Sec. 3 NRS 201.220 is hereby amended to read as follows:
201.220 1. A person who makes any open and indecent or obscene exposure of his person, or of the person of another, is guilty:
(a) For the first offense, of a gross misdemeanor.
(b) For any subsequent offense, of a category D felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.
2. [A person convicted of violating any of the provisions of subsection 1 must not be:
(a) Paroled unless a board consisting of:
(1) The administrator of the mental hygiene and mental retardation division of the department of human resources;
(2) The director of the department of prisons; and
(3) A psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada,
certifies that the person so convicted was under observation while confined in an institution of the department of prisons and is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others. For the purposes of this paragraph, the administrator and the director may each designate a person to represent him on the board.
(b) Released on probation unless a psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada certifies that the person so convicted is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
3.] For the purposes of this section, the breast feeding of a child by the child's mother does not constitute an act of open and indecent or obscene exposure of her body.
Sec. 4 NRS 201.230 is hereby amended to read as follows:
201.230 [1.] A person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act, other than acts constituting the crime of sexual assault, upon or with the body, or any part or member thereof, of a child under the age of 14 years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust or passions or sexual desires of that person or of that child, is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 2 years and a maximum term of not more than 10 years, and may be further punished by a fine of not more than $10,000.
[2. A person convicted of violating any of the provisions of subsection 1 must not be:
(a) Paroled unless a board consisting of:
(1) The administrator of the mental hygiene and mental retardation division of the department of human resources;
(2) The director of the department of prisons; and
(3) A psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada,
certifies that the person so convicted was under observation while confined in an institution of the department of prisons and is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others. For the purposes of this paragraph, the administrator and the director may each designate a person to represent him on the board.
(b) Released on probation unless a psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada certifies that the person so convicted is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.]
Sec. 5 NRS 201.450 is hereby amended to read as follows:
201.450 1. A person who commits a sexual penetration on the dead body of a human being is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison:
(a) For life with the possibility of parole, with eligibility for parole beginning when a minimum of 5 years has been served;
(b) For a definite term of 15 years, with eligibility for parole beginning when a minimum of 5 years has been served;
(c) By a fine of not more than $20,000; or
(d) By both fine and imprisonment.
2. [A person convicted of a violation of subsection 1 must not be granted probation or parole unless a psychologist licensed to practice in the State of Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in the State of Nevada certifies that the person is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
3.] For the purposes of this section, "sexual penetration" means cunnilingus, fellatio or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person's body or any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital or anal openings of the body of another, including sexual intercourse in what would be its ordinary meaning if practiced upon the living.
Sec. 6 Chapter 207 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, if a person is convicted of coercion or attempted coercion in violation of paragraph (a) of subsection 2 of NRS 207.190, the court shall, at the request of the prosecuting attorney, conduct a separate hearing to determine whether the offense was sexually motivated. A request for such a hearing may not be submitted to the court unless the prosecuting attorney, before the commencement of the trial, files and serves upon the defendant a written notice of his intention to request such a hearing.
2. A hearing requested pursuant to subsection 1 must be conducted before:
(a) The court imposes its sentence; or
(b) A separate penalty hearing is conducted.
3. At the hearing, only evidence concerning the question of whether the offense was sexually motivated may be presented. The prosecuting attorney must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the offense was sexually motivated.
4. A person may stipulate that his offense was sexually motivated before a hearing held pursuant to subsection 1 or as part of an agreement to plead guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere.
5. The court shall enter in the record:
(a) Its finding from a hearing held pursuant to subsection 1; or
(b) A stipulation made pursuant to subsection 4.
6. For the purposes of this section, an offense is "sexually motivated" if one of the purposes for which the person committed the offense was his sexual gratification.
Sec. 7 NRS 207.180 is hereby amended to read as follows:
207.180 1. Any person who knowingly sends or delivers any letter or writing:
(a) Threatening to accuse another of a crime or misdemeanor, or to expose or publish any of his infirmities or failings, with intent to extort money, goods, chattels or other valuable thing; or
(b) Threatening to maim, wound, kill or murder, or to burn or destroy his house or other property, or to accuse another of a crime or misdemeanor, or expose or publish any of his infirmities, though no money, goods, chattels or other valuable thing be demanded,
is guilty of a misdemeanor.
2. Any person who:
(a) Writes and sends, or writes and delivers, either through the mail, express, by private parties or otherwise, any anonymous letter, or any letter bearing a fictitious name, charging any person with crime; or
(b) Writes and sends any anonymous letter or letters bearing a fictitious name, containing vulgar or threatening language, obscene pictures, or containing reflections upon his standing in society or in the community,
is guilty of a misdemeanor.
[3. No person convicted of violating the provisions of subsection 1 or 2 may be released on probation unless a psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada certifies that the person so convicted is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.]
Sec. 8 NRS 176.185 is hereby amended to read as follows:
176.185 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, whenever a person is found guilty in a district court of a crime upon verdict or plea, except in cases of murder of the first or second degree, kidnaping in the first degree, sexual assault, attempted sexual assault of a child who is less than 16 years of age, an offense for which the suspension of sentence or the granting of probation is expressly forbidden, or where the person is found to be a habitual criminal pursuant to NRS 207.010, a habitually fraudulent felon pursuant to NRS 207.014 or a habitual felon pursuant to NRS 207.012, the court:
(a) If the person is found guilty of a category E felony, shall suspend the execution of the sentence imposed and grant probation to the person pursuant to NRS 193.130; or
(b) If the person is found guilty of any other felony, a gross misdemeanor or a misdemeanor, may suspend the execution of the sentence imposed and grant probation as the court deems advisable.
2. In determining whether to place a person on probation, the court shall not consider whether the person has the financial ability to participate in a program of probation secured by a surety bond established pursuant to NRS 176.1851 to 176.18525, inclusive.
3. The court may not grant probation to a person convicted of [indecent or obscene exposure or of lewdness only if a certificate of a psychologist or psychiatrist, as required by NRS 201.210, 201.220 or 201.230, is received by the court.] an offense listed in subsection 4 unless a psychologist licensed to practice in the State of Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in the State of Nevada certifies that the person is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
4. The provisions of subsection 3 apply to a person convicted of:
(a) Attempted sexual assault of a person who is 16 years old or older pursuant to NRS 200.366.
(b) Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368.
(c) Battery with intent to commit sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.400.
(d) Abuse or neglect of a child pursuant to NRS 200.508.
(e) An offense involving pornography and a minor pursuant to NRS 200.710 to 200.730, inclusive.
(f) Incest pursuant to NRS 201.180.
(g) Solicitation of a minor to engage in acts constituting the infamous crime against nature pursuant to NRS 201.195.
(h) Open or gross lewdness pursuant to NRS 201.210.
(i) Indecent or obscene exposure pursuant to NRS 201.220.
(j) Lewdness with a child pursuant to NRS 201.230.
(k) Sexual penetration of a dead human body pursuant to NRS 201.450.
(l) A violation of NRS 207.180.
(m) An attempt to commit an offense listed in paragraphs (b) to (l), inclusive.
(n) Coercion or attempted coercion that is determined to be sexually motivated pursuant to section 6 of this act.
5. The court shall consider the standards adopted pursuant to NRS 213.10988 and the recommendation of the chief parole and probation officer, if any, in determining whether to grant probation.
[4.] 6. If the court determines that a defendant is otherwise eligible for probation but requires more supervision than would normally be provided to a person granted probation, the court may, in lieu of sentencing him to a term of imprisonment, grant him probation pursuant to the program of intensive supervision established pursuant to NRS 176.198.
[5.] 7. The court shall not, except as otherwise provided in this subsection, grant probation to a person convicted of a felony until the court receives a written report from the chief parole and probation officer. The chief parole and probation officer shall submit a written report not later than 45 days following a request for a probation investigation from the county clerk, but if a report is not submitted by the chief parole and probation officer within 45 days the district judge may grant probation without the written report.
[6.] 8. If the court determines that a defendant is otherwise eligible for probation, the court shall when determining the conditions of that probation consider the imposition of such conditions as would facilitate timely payments by the defendant of his obligation, if any, for the support of a child and the payment of any such obligation which is in arrears.
Sec. 9 NRS 176.198 is hereby amended to read as follows:
176.198 1. The chief parole and probation officer shall develop a program for the intensive supervision of a person granted probation pursuant to subsection [4] 6 of NRS 176.185.
2. The program of intensive supervision must include an initial period of electronic supervision of the probationer with an electronic device approved by the division. The device must be minimally intrusive and limited in capability to recording or transmitting information concerning the probationer's presence at his residence, including, but not limited to, the transmission of still visual images which do not concern the probationer's activities while inside his residence. A device which is capable of recording or transmitting:
(a) Oral or wire communications or any auditory sound; or
(b) Information concerning the probationer's activities while inside his residence,
must not be used.
Sec. 10 NRS 213.1099 is hereby amended to read as follows:
213.1099 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section and NRS 213.1215, the board may release on parole a prisoner who is otherwise eligible for parole pursuant to NRS 213.107 to 213.157, inclusive.
2. In determining whether to release a prisoner on parole, the board shall consider:
(a) Whether there is a reasonable probability that the prisoner will live and remain at liberty without violating the laws;
(b) Whether the release is incompatible with the welfare of society;
(c) The seriousness of the offense and the history of criminal conduct of the prisoner;
(d) The standards adopted pursuant to NRS 213.10885 and the recommendation, if any, of the chief; and
(e) Any documents or testimony submitted by a victim notified pursuant to NRS 213.130.
3. When a person is convicted of a felony and is punished by a sentence of imprisonment, he remains subject to the jurisdiction of the board from the time he is released on parole under the provisions of this chapter until the expiration of the maximum term of imprisonment imposed by the court less any credits earned to reduce his sentence pursuant to chapter 209 of NRS.
4. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 213.1215, the board may not release on parole a prisoner whose sentence to death or to life without possibility of parole has been commuted to a lesser penalty unless it finds that the prisoner has served at least 20 consecutive years in the state prison, is not under an order to be detained to answer for a crime or violation of parole or probation in another jurisdiction, and that he does not have a history of:
(a) Recent misconduct in the institution, and that he has been recommended for parole by the director of the department of prisons;
(b) Repetitive criminal conduct;
(c) Criminal conduct related to the use of alcohol or drugs;
(d) Repetitive sexual deviance, violence or aggression; or
(e) Failure in parole, probation, work release or similar programs.
5. In determining whether to release a prisoner on parole pursuant to this section, the board shall not consider whether the prisoner will soon be eligible for release pursuant to NRS 213.1215.
6. The board shall not release on parole a sex offender until the law enforcement agency in whose jurisdiction a sex offender will be released on parole has been provided an opportunity to give the notice required by the attorney general pursuant to NRS 213.1253.
7. The board shall not release on parole a prisoner convicted of an offense listed in subsection 8 unless a panel consisting of:
(a) The administrator of the mental hygiene and mental retardation division of the department of human resources;
(b) The director of the department of prisons; and
(c) A psychologist licensed to practice in the State of Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in the State of Nevada,
certifies that the prisoner was under observation while confined and is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others. For the purposes of this subsection, the administrator and the director may each designate a person to represent him on the panel.
8. The provisions of subsection 7 apply to a prisoner convicted of:
(a) Sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.366.
(b) Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368.
(c) Battery with intent to commit sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.400.
(d) Abuse or neglect of a child pursuant to NRS 200.508.
(e) An offense involving pornography and a minor pursuant to NRS 200.710 to 200.730, inclusive.
(f) Incest pursuant to NRS 201.180.
(g) Solicitation of a minor to engage in acts constituting the infamous crime against nature pursuant to NRS 201.195.
(h) Open or gross lewdness pursuant to NRS 201.210.
(i) Indecent or obscene exposure pursuant to NRS 201.220.
(j) Lewdness with a child pursuant to NRS 201.230.
(k) Sexual penetration of a dead human body pursuant to NRS 201.450.
(l) An attempt to commit an offense listed in this paragraphs (a) to (l), inclusive.
(m) Coercion or attempted coercion that is determined to be sexually motivated pursuant to section 6 of this act.
Sec. 11 NRS 200.375 is hereby repealed.
Sec. 12 The amendatory provisions of section 6 of this act do not apply to an offense committed before October 1, 1997.
Sec. 13 The provisions of subsection 1 of NRS 354.599 do not apply to any additional expenses of a local government that are related to the provisions of this act.
TEXT OF REPEALED SECTION
200.375Limitations on parole.
1. A person convicted of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault may not be paroled unless a board consisting of:
(a) The administrator of the mental hygiene and mental retardation division of the department of human resources;
(b) The director of the department of prisons; and
(c) A psychologist licensed to practice in Nevada or a psychiatrist licensed to practice medicine in Nevada,
certifies that the person so convicted was under observation while confined in an institution of the department of prisons and is not a menace to the health, safety or morals of others.
2. For the purposes of this section, the administrator and the director may each designate a person to represent him on the board.".
Amend the title of the bill by deleting the second and third lines and inserting:
"certain crimes may be released on parole; requiring certification by a psychologist or a psychiatrist before offenders convicted of certain crimes may be released on probation; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.".
Amend the summary of the bill, first line, by deleting "by panel".
Senator James moved the adoption of the amendment.
Motion carried.
Senator James moved that Senate Bill No. 5 be re-referred to the Committee on Finance.
Remarks by Senator James.
Motion carried.
Bill ordered reprinted, engrossed and to the Committee on Finance.
Senate Bill No. 6.
Bill read second time.
The following amendment was proposed by the Committee on Judiciary:
Amendment No. 89.
Amend the bill as a whole by renumbering sections 1 through 3 as sections 4 through 6 and adding new sections designated sections 1 through 3, following the enacting clause, to read as follows:
"Section 1. NRS 176.015 is hereby amended to read as follows:
176.015 1. Sentence must be imposed without unreasonable delay. Pending sentence the court may commit the defendant or continue or alter the bail.
2. Before imposing sentence the court shall:
(a) Afford counsel an opportunity to speak on behalf of the defendant; and
(b) Address the defendant personally and ask him if he wishes to make a statement in his own behalf and to present any information in mitigation of punishment.
3. Before imposing sentence the court shall afford the victim an opportunity to:
(a) Appear personally, by counsel or by personal representative; and
(b) Reasonably express any views concerning the crime, the person responsible, the impact of the crime on the victim and the need for restitution.
4. The prosecutor shall give reasonable notice of the hearing to impose sentence to:
(a) The person against whom the crime was committed;
(b) A person who was injured as a direct result of the commission of the crime;
(c) The surviving spouse, parents or children of a person who was killed as a direct result of the commission of the crime; and
(d) Any other relative or victim who requests in writing to be notified of the hearing.
Any defect in notice or failure of such persons to appear are not grounds for an appeal or the granting of a writ of habeas corpus. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim or relative and which is received by the prosecutor pursuant to this subsection is confidential.
5. For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Relative" of a person includes:
(1) A spouse, parent, grandparent or stepparent;
(2) A natural born child, stepchild or adopted child;
(3) A grandchild, brother, sister, half brother or half sister; or
(4) A parent of a spouse.
(b) "Victim" includes:
(1) A person, including a governmental entity, against whom a crime has been committed;
(2) A person who has been injured or killed as a direct result of the commission of a crime; and
(3) A relative of a person described in subparagraph (1) or (2).
6. This section does not restrict the authority of the court to consider any reliable and relevant evidence at the time of sentencing.
Sec. 2. NRS 176.221 is hereby amended to read as follows:
176.221 If the probationer is arrested, by or without warrant, in another judicial district of this state, the court which granted the probation may assign the case to the district court of that district, with the consent of that court. The court retaining or thus acquiring jurisdiction shall cause the defendant to be brought before it, consider the standards adopted pursuant to NRS 213.10988 and the recommendation, if any, of the chief parole and probation officer. Upon determining that the probationer has violated a condition of his probation, the court shall, if practicable, order the probationer to make restitution for any necessary expenses incurred by a governmental entity in returning him to the court for violation of his probation. The court may:
1. Continue or revoke the probation or suspension of sentence;
2. Order the probationer to a term of residential confinement pursuant to NRS 176.2231;
3. Order the probationer to undergo a program of regimental discipline pursuant to NRS 176.2248;
4. Cause the sentence imposed to be executed; or
5. Modify the original sentence imposed by reducing the term of imprisonment and cause the modified sentence to be executed. The court shall not make the term of imprisonment less than the minimum term of imprisonment prescribed by the applicable penal statute. If the chief parole and probation officer recommends that the sentence of a probationer be modified and the modified sentence be executed, he shall provide notice of the recommendation to any victim of the crime for which the probationer was convicted who has requested in writing to be notified and who has provided his current address to the division. The notice must inform the victim that he has the right to submit documents to the court and to be present and heard at the hearing to determine whether the sentence of a probationer who has violated a condition of his probation should be modified. The court shall not modify the sentence of a probationer and cause the sentence to be executed until it has confirmed that the chief parole and probation officer has complied with the provisions of this subsection. The chief parole and probation officer must not be held responsible when such notification is not received by the victim if the victim has not provided a current address. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the division pursuant to this subsection is confidential.
Sec. 3. Chapter 178 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
"All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim, relative, witness or other person and which is received pursuant to the provisions of NRS 178.569 to 178.5698, inclusive, is confidential.".
Amend section 1, page 1, line 2, by deleting "178.5692" and inserting "[178.5692] 178.569".
Amend section 1, page 1, line 4, after "1.]" by inserting:
"and section 3 of this act,".
Amend sec. 2, page 3, line 15, by deleting "210.180" and inserting "201.180".
Amend the bill as a whole by renumbering sec. 4 as sec. 14 and adding new sections designated sections 7 through 13, following sec. 3, to read as follows:
"Sec. 7. NRS 62.193 is hereby amended to read as follows:
62.193 1. Proceedings concerning any child alleged to be delinquent, in need of supervision or in need of commitment to an institution for the mentally retarded are not criminal in nature and must be heard separately from the trial of cases against adults, and without a jury. The hearing may be conducted in an informal manner and may be held at a juvenile detention facility or elsewhere at the discretion of the judge. Stenographic notes or other transcript of the hearing are not required unless the court so orders. All proceedings pursuant to this chapter must be open to the general public unless the judge, or in case of a reference, the referee, upon his own motion or upon the motion of another person, determines that all or part of the proceedings must be closed to the general public because such closure is in the best interests of the child or the general public. If the judge or referee determines that all or part of the proceedings must be closed to the general public, the general public must be excluded and only those persons having a direct interest in the case may be admitted, as ordered by the judge or referee. The judge or referee in his sole discretion may determine that a victim or any member of a victim's family is a person having a direct interest in the case who may be admitted to the proceedings.
2. The court shall provide written notice of any hearing after the initial detention hearing to the parent, guardian or custodian of the child together with a copy of a notice which the parent, guardian or custodian may provide to his employer. The employer's copy of the notice must set forth the date and time of the hearing and the provisions of NRS 62.410. The employer's copy of the notice must not set forth the name of the child or the offense alleged.
3. The parties must be advised of their rights in their first appearance at intake and before the court. They must be informed of the specific allegations in the petition and given an opportunity to admit or deny those allegations.
4. If the allegations are denied, the court shall proceed to hear evidence on the petition. The court shall record its findings on whether the acts ascribed to the child in the petition were committed by him. If the court finds that the allegations in the petition have not been established, it shall dismiss the petition and order the child discharged from any detention or temporary care previously ordered in the proceedings, unless otherwise ordered by the court.
5. If the court finds on the basis of an admission or a finding on proof beyond a reasonable doubt, based upon competent, material and relevant evidence, that a child committed the acts by reason of which he is alleged to be delinquent, it may, in the absence of objection and except as otherwise provided in NRS 62.214, proceed immediately to make a proper disposition of the case.
6. The court may, at the request of the district attorney, expedite the date for any adjudicatory hearing involving acts committed against a child less than 16 years of age or involving acts witnessed by a child less than 16 years of age. In making a ruling, the court may consider the effect a delay in the commencement of the hearing might have on the mental or emotional health or well-being of the child.
7. In adjudicatory hearings all competent, material and relevant evidence helpful in determining the questions presented, including oral and written reports, may be received by the court and may be relied upon to the extent of its probative value. The parties or their counsel must be afforded an opportunity to examine and controvert written reports so received and to cross-examine persons making reports when reasonably available.
8. On its motion or that of a party, the court may continue the hearings under this section for a reasonable period to receive reports and other evidence bearing on the disposition. If the hearing involves acts committed against a child less than 16 years of age or involving acts witnessed by a child less than 16 years of age, the court may consider any adverse effect a continuance or other postponement might have upon the mental or emotional health or well-being of the child. The court may deny a continuance or other postponement if the delay will adversely affect the mental or emotional health or well-being of the child. The court shall make an appropriate order for detention or temporary care of the child subject to supervision of the court during the period of any continuance.
9. If the court finds by preponderance of the evidence that the child is in need of supervision or is in need of commitment to an institution for the mentally retarded, the court may proceed immediately, or at a postponed hearing, to make proper disposition of the case.
10. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 11, the court shall make its final disposition of a case no later than 60 days after the petition was filed.
11. The court may extend the time for final disposition of a case by filing an order setting forth specific reasons for the extension:
(a) No later than 60 days after the petition was filed; or
(b) Later than 60 days after the petition was filed, if the court finds that the extension would serve the interests of justice. In deciding whether an extension would serve the interests of justice, the court shall consider:
(1) The gravity of the act alleged in the case;
(2) The reasons for any delay in the disposition of the case; and
(3) The potential consequences to the child, victim and public of not extending the time for final disposition of the case.
An extension of time for final disposition of a case granted pursuant to this subsection must not exceed 1 year from the date of filing the petition.
12. The prosecuting attorney shall disclose to the victim of an act committed by a child the disposition of the child's case regarding that act if the victim, or a parent or guardian of the victim, requests such a disclosure. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim or a parent or guardian of a victim and which is received by the prosecuting attorney pursuant to this subsection is confidential.
Sec. 8. NRS 209.392 is hereby amended to read as follows:
209.392 1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 209.429, the director may, at the request of an offender who is eligible for residential confinement pursuant to the standards adopted by the director pursuant to subsection 3 and who has:
(a) Established a position of employment in the community;
(b) Enrolled in a program for education or rehabilitation; or
(c) Demonstrated an ability to pay for all or part of the costs of his confinement and to meet any existing obligation for restitution to any victim of his crime,
assign the offender to the custody of the division of parole and probation of the department of motor vehicles and public safety to serve a term of residential confinement, pursuant to NRS 213.380, for not longer than the remainder of his sentence.
2. Upon receiving a request to serve a term of residential confinement from an eligible offender, the director shall notify the division of parole and probation. If any victim of a crime committed by the offender has, pursuant to subsection 3 of NRS 213.130, requested to be notified of an application for parole and provided a current address, the division of parole and probation shall notify the victim of the offender's request and advise the victim that he may submit documents regarding the request to the division of parole and probation. If a current address has not been provided as required by subsection 3 of NRS 213.130, the division of parole and probation must not be held responsible if such notification is not received by the victim. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the division of parole and probation pursuant to this subsection is confidential.
3. The director, after consulting with the division of parole and probation, shall adopt, by regulation, standards providing which offenders are eligible for residential confinement. The standards adopted by the director must provide that an offender who:
(a) Is not eligible for parole or release from prison within a reasonable period;
(b) Has recently committed a serious infraction of the rules of an institution or facility of the department;
(c) Has not performed the duties assigned to him in a faithful and orderly manner;
(d) Has ever been convicted of:
(1) Any crime involving the use or threatened use of force or violence against the victim; or
(2) A sexual offense;
(e) Has more than one prior conviction for any felony in this state or any offense in another state that would be a felony if committed in this state, not including a violation of NRS 484.3792 or 484.3795;
(f) Has escaped or attempted to escape from any jail or correctional institution for adults; or
(g) Has not made an effort in good faith to participate in or to complete any educational or vocational program or any program of treatment, as ordered by the director,
is not eligible for assignment to the custody of the division of parole and probation of the department of motor vehicles and public safety to serve a term of residential confinement pursuant to this section.
4. If an offender assigned to the custody of the division of parole and probation pursuant to this section escapes or violates any of the terms or conditions of his residential confinement:
(a) The division of parole and probation may, pursuant to the procedure set forth in NRS 213.410, return the offender to the custody of the department of prisons.
(b) The offender forfeits all or part of the credits for good behavior earned by him before the escape or violation, as determined by the director. The director may provide for a forfeiture of credits pursuant to this paragraph only after proof of the offense and notice to the offender, and may restore credits forfeited for such reasons as he considers proper. The decision of the director regarding such a forfeiture is final.
5. The assignment of an offender to the custody of the division of parole and probation pursuant to this section shall be deemed:
(a) A continuation of his imprisonment and not a release on parole; and
(b) For the purposes of NRS 209.341, an assignment to a facility of the department of prisons,
except that the offender is not entitled to obtain any benefits or to participate in any programs provided to offenders in the custody of the department of prisons.
6. A person does not have a right to be assigned to the custody of the division of parole and probation pursuant to this section, or to remain in that custody after such an assignment, and it is not intended that the provisions of this section or of NRS 213.371 to 213.410, inclusive, create any right or interest in liberty or property or establish a basis for any cause of action against the state, its political subdivisions, agencies, boards, commissions, departments, officers or employees.
Sec. 9. NRS 209.521 is hereby amended to read as follows:
209.521 1. If a victim of an offender provides his current address to the director and makes a written request for notification of the offender's release or escape, the director shall notify the victim if the offender:
(a) Will be released into the community for the purpose of employment, training or education, or for any other purpose for which release is authorized; or
(b) Has escaped from the custody of the department of prisons.
2. An offender must not be temporarily released into the community for any purpose unless notification of the release has been given to every victim of the offender who has requested notification and has provided his current address.
3. The director may not be held responsible for any injury proximately caused by his failure to give any notice required pursuant to subsection 1 or 2 if no address was provided to the director or the address provided is inaccurate or not current.
4. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the director pursuant to this section is confidential.
5. As used in this section, "victim" has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 213.005.
Sec. 10. NRS 213.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:
213.010 1. The state board of pardons commissioners consists of the governor, the justices of the supreme court and the attorney general.
2. Meetings of the board for the purpose of considering applications for clemency may be held semiannually or oftener, on such dates as may be fixed by the board.
3. The board shall give written notice at least 15 days before a meeting to each victim of the crimes committed by each person whose application for clemency will be considered at the meeting, if the victim so requests in writing and provides his current address. If a current address is not provided, the board may not be held responsible if the notice is not received by the victim. The victim may submit a written response to the board at any time before the meeting. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the board pursuant to this subsection is confidential.
Sec. 11. NRS 213.040 is hereby amended to read as follows:
213.040 All district attorneys receiving notice of an application for a pardon, or commutation of punishment, or remission of fine or forfeiture, shall transmit forthwith to:
1. The board a statement in writing of facts surrounding the commission of the offense for which the applicant is incarcerated or subject to penalty and any information affecting the merits of the application.
2. Each victim of the person applying for clemency a copy of the notice of the application, if the victim so requests in writing and provides his current address. If a current address is not provided, the district attorney may not be held responsible if a copy of the notice is not received by the victim. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the district attorney pursuant to this subsection is confidential.
Sec. 12. NRS 213.095 is hereby amended to read as follows:
213.095 If the board remits a fine or forfeiture, commutes a sentence or grants a pardon, it shall give written notice of its action to the victim of the person granted clemency, if the victim so requests in writing and provides his current address. If a current address is not provided, the board may not be held responsible if the notice is not received by the victim. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the board pursuant to this section is confidential.
Sec. 13. NRS 213.130 is hereby amended to read as follows:
213.130 1. A prisoner sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison may apply to the board for parole. The application must be made on a form prescribed by the board and must contain:
(a) The county in which the prisoner will reside, if the prisoner will be paroled in Nevada; and
(b) Other data that will assist the board in determining whether parole should be granted.
The secretary of the board shall furnish any prisoner an application form upon request.
2. Meetings for the purpose of considering applications for parole may be held semiannually or more often, on such dates as may be fixed by the board. All meetings must be open to the public.
3. Not later than 5 days after the date on which the board fixes the date of the meeting to consider the application of a prisoner for parole, the board shall notify the victim of the prisoner whose application is being considered of the date of the meeting and of his rights pursuant to this subsection, if the victim has requested notification in writing and has provided his current address or if the victim's current address is otherwise known by the board. The victim of any person applying for parole may submit documents to the board and may testify at the meeting held to consider the application. An application for parole must not be considered until the board has notified any victim of his rights pursuant to this subsection and he is given the opportunity to exercise those rights. If a current address is not provided to or otherwise known by the board, the board must not be held responsible if such notification is not received by the victim.
4. The board may deliberate in private after a public meeting held to consider an application for parole.
5. The board of state prison commissioners shall provide suitable and convenient rooms or space for use of the board.
6. If a victim is notified of a meeting to consider an application for parole pursuant to subsection 3, the board shall, upon making a final decision concerning the application, notify the victim of its final decision.
7. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the board pursuant to this section is confidential.
8. For the purposes of this section, "victim" has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 213.005.".
Amend the title of the bill, fourth line, after "juveniles;" by inserting:
- "providing that certain information pertaining to notification of victim and witnesses is confidential;".
Amend the summary of the bill to read as follows:
- "Summary--Revises provisions governing notification of victims of and witnesses to offenses and requires certain information to be provided to victims of and witnesses to sexual or violent offenses. (BDR 14-291)".
Senator James moved the adoption of the amendment.
Remarks by Senator James.
Amendment adopted.
Senator James moved that Senate Bill No. 6 be re-referred to the Committee on Finance.
Motion carried.
Bill ordered reprinted, engrossed and to the Committee on Finance.
Senate Bill No. 100.
Bill read second time.
The following amendment was proposed by the Committee on Judiciary:
Amendment No. 92.
Amend sec. 18, page 4, line 21, by deleting:
"to be held before a jury".
Amend sec. 19, page 4, by deleting lines 24 through 37 and inserting:
"Sec. 19. At a hearing to determine whether a person is a sexually violent predator, the court shall act as the finder of fact.".
Amend sec. 20, page 4, line 39, by deleting:
"beyond a reasonable doubt" and inserting:
"by clear and convincing evidence".
Amend sec. 20, page 5, line 4, by deleting:
"beyond a reasonable doubt" and inserting:
"by clear and convincing evidence".
Amend sec. 20, page 5, by deleting lines 8 through 13 and inserting:
"3. If the court finds that the person named in the".
Amend sec. 20, page 5, by deleting lines 17 and 18 and inserting:
"4. If the court finds that the person named in the petition is a sexually violent predator but does not find ".
Amend sec. 20, page 5, by deleting line 23 and inserting:
"5. If the court finds that the district attorney has not proven that the person named".
Amend sec. 21, page 5, line 35, by deleting "3" and inserting "2".
Amend sec. 22, page 5, line 44, by deleting "behalf." and inserting "behalf;".
Amend sec. 22, page 6, line 4, by deleting "reports." and inserting "reports; and ".
Amend sec. 23, page 6, line 11, by deleting:
"at least once per year" and inserting:
"once every 6 months".
Amend the bill as a whole by deleting sections 24 through 28 and adding new sections designated sections 24 through 28, following sec. 23, to read as follows:
"Sec. 24. If, at any time during the period of commitment, the administrator determines that a person committed to the custody of the program:
1. No longer suffers from a mental disorder;
2. No longer is dangerous to the public; or
3. Is suitable for conditional release to an alternative course of treatment,
the administrator, within 5 days after this determination, shall file with the court a request for release of the person committed and shall provide a copy of the request for release to the person committed and the district attorney.
Sec. 25. 1. Upon receiving from the administrator:
(a) The report prepared every 6 months pursuant to section 23 of this act; or
(b) A request for release filed pursuant to section 24 of this act,
the court shall schedule a hearing to show cause. The hearing to show cause must be held not later than 5 days after the date the report or the request for release is received from the administrator.
2. At the hearing to show cause, the court shall determine whether probable cause exists to believe that the mental condition or the dangerousness of the person committed has so changed that a hearing for release is warranted. The person committed may be represented by counsel at the hearing to show cause, but the person committed may not be present at the hearing.
3. If the court determines that probable cause exists to believe that the mental condition or the dangerousness of the person committed has so changed that a hearing for release is warranted, the court shall schedule a hearing for release, which must be held not later than 45 days after the date of the hearing to show cause.
Sec. 26. If the court schedules a hearing for release, the district attorney may request that the person committed submit to an examination by a qualified professional selected by the district attorney. A request for an examination pursuant to this section must be made not later than 30 days before the date of the hearing for release.
Sec. 27. A hearing for release must be conducted in the same manner as a hearing to determine whether a person is a sexually violent predator, and the person committed must be afforded the same rights that are provided in a hearing to determine whether a person is a sexually violent predator.
Sec. 28. At a hearing for release:
1. To prove that the person committed remains a sexually violent predator, the district attorney must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person committed:
(a) Continues to suffer from a mental disorder; and
(b) Continues to be dangerous to the public because he is likely to commit a sexually violent offense.
2. To prove that the person committed requires continued commitment to the program, the district attorney must prove by clear and convincing evidence that an alternative course of treatment:
(a) Is not in the best interests of the person committed; or
(b) Will not adequately protect the public.
3. If the court finds that the person committed remains a sexually violent predator and that the person requires continued commitment to the program, the court shall enter an order continuing the commitment of the person.
4. If the court finds that the person committed remains a sexually violent predator but does not find that the person requires continued commitment to the program, the court shall enter an order that the person be conditionally released to undergo an alternative course of treatment pursuant to the provisions of sections 29 and 30 of this act.
5. If the court finds that the district attorney has not proven that the person committed remains a sexually violent predator, the court shall enter an order that the person be released.".
Amend sec. 32, page 9, line 22, by deleting "including" and inserting:
"including, but not limited to,".
Senator James moved the adoption of the amendment.
Remarks by Senators James and Neal.
Amendment adopted.
Senator James moved that Senate Bill No. 100 be re-referred to the Committee on Finance.
Motion carried.
Bill ordered reprinted, engrossed and to the Committee on Finance.
Senate Bill No. 122.
Bill read second time.
The following amendment was proposed by the Committee on Judiciary:
Amendment No. 127.
Amend sec. 9, page 2, line 16, by deleting:
"a public school or private school," and inserting:
"the public school or private school at which the person is employed,".
Amend sec. 9, page 2, line 17, by deleting "pursuant to" and inserting:
"as provided in".
Amend sec. 10, page 2, line 34, by deleting "pursuant to" and inserting:
"as provided in".
Senator McGinness moved the adoption of the amendment.
Remarks by Senator McGinness.
Amendment adopted.
Bill ordered reprinted, engrossed and to third reading.
Senate Bill No. 237.
Bill read second time and ordered to third reading.
GENERAL FILE AND THIRD READING
Senate Bill No. 33.
Bill read third time.
Remarks by Senators Regan, Adler, Titus, Neal, and Coffin.
(A portion of these remarks were made on April 2, 1997.)
Senator Adler requested that the following remarks be entered in the Journal.
Senator Adler:
Thank you, Mr. President. Senate Bill No. 33 is a critical bill. Currently, as most of you know, any child can possess or use tobacco products in the State of Nevada. My seven-year-old twins could conceivably smoke cigarettes, in Nevada, and it would not be a crime, not an offense; it is absolutely nothing. There is nothing to stop that activity.
Senate Bill No. 33 does not declare these children delinquents. It declares them as children in need of supervision. Certainly, a child of 11, 12 or 13 years of age, who is using tobacco products, is in need of supervision. On the first two offenses, the primary enforcement mechanism is a counseling class on the use of tobacco products and the dangers associated with the use of these products. As I stated earlier, 400,000 Americans die each year from diseases associated with the use of tobacco. It is the leading preventable cause of death in this country. If you look at statistics, tobacco usage kills more people than does automobile accidents, all murders, suicides, AIDS and alcohol usage combined. It is truly the great killer in U. S. society. Of the 400,000 who will die this year, 90 percent of them began smoking in their teen age years and/or lower. Only 10 percent of them will begin smoking as adults. Anything we can do to discourage youths from smoking is something I feel we are obligated to do as a society.
I do not mean to keep repeating statistics, but as all of you know Nevada has the highest level of smokers of any state in the Union. We have tremendous health care costs associated with smoking in this state. In terms of our Medicaid budget, our hospital bill, it has been absolutely devastating to the State of Nevada.
This is only one piece of the puzzle. I wish we could have passed another piece earlier today. This is something we need to make a statement in Nevada that we do not think it acceptable for youths to use tobacco products. This is not a harsh measure. This measure is not branding our youth as criminals, but is merely saying that these children, who are using tobacco products, need to go to counseling and be told that smoking cigarettes is one of the most dangerous things they can do in terms of their lives and their health. I would urge all of you to vote for this measure. This is a public policy statement that we need to make. Most other states have made policy statements regarding tobacco use with only 14 states not having some prohibition. We must make a statement to the fact that we find the use of tobacco products by our youth unacceptable.
Senator Regan:
Thank you, Mr. President. I stand in opposition to S.B. 33. Before I begin my remarks, I would like for everyone to be aware that the boxes on your desks are from me. They are not a gift from the tobacco industry. These are the boxes we used on the bill that was passed in the previous session, A.B. 622. This bill was introduced in conjunction with the Attorney General's Office and retailers throughout the State of Nevada. Those are the kits that were presented to the retailers throughout the state.
I concur, with my esteemed colleague from the Capital District, that cigarettes are a problem. I do not think this is a question of morality. The questions I read in this bill indicate that there is almost a parental involvement of what we should be telling parents to do.
To bring you up to speed as to what is going on with tobacco on a national level, the key FDA rules presently effective February 28th of this year, are:
Rules Effective February 28, 1997
- Minimum Sales Age: Retailers may not sell cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to anyone under18 years of age.
- Proof of Age: Retailers must verify by photo ID that any person purchasing cigarettes or smokeless tobacco is at least 18 years of age. Customers over 26 years of age do not need to be asked to verify age. Age does not need to be verified in facilities that are off-limits to persons under18 years of age.
Rules Effective August 28, 1997
- Self-Service Display Ban: Retailers may not offer cigarettes and smokeless tobacco from self-service displays, except in facilities where persons under 18 years of age (including employees) are not permitted.
- Vending Machine Ban: Retailers may not sell cigarettes or smokeless tobacco from vending machines, except in facilities where persons under 18 years of age (including employees) are not permitted.
- No Breaking Packs: Retailers may sell cigarettes only in unopened packages containing at least 20 cigarettes or in cartons. Retailers may sell smokeless tobacco only as packaged by the manufacturer.
- Mail-Order Sales: Retailers may fill mail-order requests, but may not redeem coupons sent by mail.
- Exterior Signage: Retailers within 1000 feet of a playground or school may not display exterior or outdoor advertising for cigarettes or smokeless tobacco.
- Interior Signage: Retailers must ensure that all point-of-sale advertising for cigarettes or smokeless tobacco (including advertising on functional items such as clocks, door decals, change trays, and shopping carts) is in a "tombstone" format (black text on a white background), except in facilities where persons under 18 years of age (including employees) are not permitted. For "adult-only facilities," any interior signage that is visible from the outside must be in "tombstone" format and attached to an interior wall or fixture.
- Established Name/Intended Use Statement: Each advertisement for cigarettes or smokeless tobacco must carry the product's "established name" and "intended use."
- No Branded Merchandise. The retailer may not sell or give away non-tobacco merchandise bearing a cigarette or smokeless tobacco brand name or logo.
- No Free Samples: Coupon redemption is permitted in face-to-face transactions, but retailers may not give cigarettes or smokeless tobacco away as free samples.
- Non-complying Functional Items: Beginning August 28, 1997, retailers may not use display racks, counter mats, change trays, shopping baskets, door decals, clocks, or any other items that bear a cigarette or smokeless tobacco brand name or logo, unless (1) the retailer covers up the brand name or logo, or (2) the advertisement appears in "tombstone" format.
- FDA Approval of Unlisted Advertising Media: Retailers who wish to use advertising that is not in a medium listed in section 897.30(a)(1) of the rule must notify the FDA 30 days in advance of the use. The notice must include information about the extent to which the advertising may be seen by people under age 18.
Not only the Federal Government is taking a position on anti-smoking, we did a wonder job in A.B. 622. Our sales are down. Looking at a statement issued by Attorney General Del Papa, it states "the Attorney General's Office in accordance with the Retail Association of Nevada offer retail training to help reduce the sale of tobacco. In 1995, the Legislature authorized responsible conducting of random, unannounced inspection of tobacco retailers by the Attorney General's Office. Since that time, over 2800 undercover stings have been conducted in Nevada. The youth tobacco purchase rate has been significantly reduced from a baseline rate of 63 percent to only 20 percent in the current fiscal year."
Ladies and Gentlemen, I would suggest you vote against S.B. 33. Thank you.
Senator James:
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise in support of this measure and commend the sponsor of the bill for bringing Nevada into the national conscienceness arising around the issue of smoking.
It is interesting to make the argument that all this legislation is being implemented at the Federal level and throughout the country recognizing that smoking is a slow way to die. Sometimes it is not even slow. Then, of interest is to make the argument that we should not pass the bill that tries to strengthen our laws in the same way. This bill would provide young people with counseling. If they are smoking, then they are missing something in their understanding as to what smoking is going to do to their lives in terms of shortening those lives. This bill tries to place them in a program to try to turn their lives around and give them a chance. Statistics show that there has been a 12 percent increase in teen smoking since 1991. Smoking is dropping in all areas of the population except for with our youth. One-half of all smokers begin smoking before they are 18 years of age. One-third of all teen smokers eventually die of tobacco related illnesses. When we sell cigarettes to kids, we are essentially selling death.
Since we passed A.B. 622 during the previous session, and a number of other things have been implemented in this Legislature, we have had one of the major tobacco companies come out and admit a number of things which are shocking. We did not think this would happen, but instead would have to be proved through long years of lawsuits. The landscape is changing rapidly. This is really not an issue of personal freedom. These are children we are talking about. We now know that the cigarette companies have really tried to target children through their advertisements. If you get someone "hooked" at an early age, then they are a customer for life or what there is of their life. It is greatly unfortunate that we would oppose a measure which would try to tell kids "don't buy cigarettes and don't smoke cigarettes," and make them responsible for their conduct. We have a law in Nevada which says that you can't buy or drink alcohol if you are under age; why should we not have the same law for smoking? It seems quite anomalous to penalize people for selling cigarettes to kids when the kid is not committing any crime in possessing.
What this bill does is to bring some sense of equity into the system. It is unfortunate we could not pass this bill as amended. The amendment would have made this more fair and a better law. Nevertheless, it is an important measure and it should be supported.
Finally, we should, with this vote today, recognize the great issue that smoking is to our country. It does not only affect other people who smoke, it affects all of us because we have to pay for their medical care and treatment when they are dying. We now know things we did not know a long time ago. Medically, it has been proven that smoking will kill you. The time to act is now to try to strengthen our laws especially when it pertains to youth. Youth is where you become "hooked" and then are a customer for a shortened life span.
Senator Augustine:
Thank you, Mr. President. We were told by the Senator from Carson City there are only 14 states which have not passed some sort of law pertaining to the possession of tobacco by minors. This is actually not true. There are 41 states who now have a minimum age for the sale of tobacco. All of these states have an age of 18 years except for Pennsylvania which is 21, Alabama and Alaska which are 19. However, there are only 7 states which today have laws for minors possessing tobacco and a penalty for their possession. California, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Montana are those states. California's law states minor offenders receive a $75 fine or 30 hours of community service work. Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Colorado and Massachusetts have possession laws for those minors who possess tobacco on school campuses, school buses and other school related places. I understand, in our local school ordinances, there is already a ban on minors possessing tobacco on any school property or school facilities.
I simply wanted to clarify, from the information I received yesterday from the National Council of State Legislatures, that the information we received on minor possession of tobacco is in error.
Senator Neal:
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise against passage of this particular measure. I do so by first stating that I am a nonsmoker. I have not heard anything presented, thus far in discussion of this issue, to say that passage in the previous session of A.B. 622 has been a failure. I have not heard that said. What I have heard is that the bill itself, which was directed toward retailers and focused upon the enforcement of retail education to eliminate the purchase of tobacco products by youths, has been a success.
I have been thinking about our Judiciary Committee which has been dealing so much in this session with sex bills. I guess smoking is a natural progression to come out of that committee. I am wondering whether or not the committee took time to go back and actually look at this subject and examine what we did two years ago and then make their judgment as to whether A.B. 622 was working or not. Apparently, that was not the case. It seems that we would like to rush in, pile upon top of legislation without really examining what we considered two years ago. Until someone can tell me that the action we took two years ago is a failure, I cannot support this particular bill before us.
Senator Adler:
Thank you, Mr. President. I would like to comment on the remarks of the last speaker. We should all be honest as to what A.B. 622 was. That measure was drafted by the tobacco industry and the retailers of this state. It was passed by this legislative body. I am not proud of that. I am not proud of a piece of regulatory legislation which really has no teeth in levying penalties. Its chief enforcement mechanism is to hand out kits to retailers. I am not proud of something which does not regulate one of the most dangerous activities currently occurring within our state. I am not proud of having a bill like that which does not attempt to reduce the amount of smoking in this state when we have the highest level of smoking in the United States. We have the highest number of citizens dying of tobacco related deaths of any state in the Union. I am not proud of that. I do not see where you can say that this has been a successful program. Certainly, it has reduced the amount of sales to teenage persons by retailers. Do you know why it did? It did because we were doing absolutely nothing prior to passage of A.B. 622. If you are going from nothing, surely you are going to see a reduction. That does not mean we have made a good faith effort in trying to address this problem. This is a serious problem. The effects of tobacco is killing thousands of people every year. It has killed some of my relatives and probably has killed relatives and friends of everyone in this body. Isn't it time you started taking some of these things seriously? We have an obligation to the people of the State of Nevada. I would believe that if this bill were placed on the ballot, it would receive at least an 80 percent positive vote. People are tired of teen smoking and cigarette use. If you want evidence of what is going on, drive by Carson High School at noon and see the 150 kids standing in front of the school smoking. If you don't think there is a problem with that, then I think you are the ones with a problem. It is a serious problem which needs to be addressed by the lawmakers of this state. The recent revelations made by the Liggett Company by turning over documents concerning smoking to the U.S. Government, indicate that there was an advertising and targeting effort to get teenagers to smoke in this country. That was a major advertising campaign by the tobacco industry.
We must do something to try and reduce the amount of teen smoking. I do not think it is wrong to make teenagers responsible for their actions. That is all this bill does. I believe it is wrong not to make them responsible just like it is not wrong to make them responsible for the use of alcohol, drugs or any other harmful product. I would urge you to support this measure. I was referring to both criminal and civil penalties, when I was quoting the statistics that my colleague indicated she thought were wrong. We have neither a civil or criminal penalty in this state which was the point I was trying to make.
I believe this is a serious problem and that we need to take some action to address it. We need to do something other than what we did last session which was to rubber stamp a measure which was practically drafted by the industry for us to pass.
Senator O'Donnell:
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise in support of this bill. I am a nonsmoker as well. I can tell you that smoking is a deadly game. It is costing this state millions and millions of dollars because we are putting people into hospitals because of smoking. This state has been noted for allowing people to have the freedom to do whatever they want to. But, when it comes to smoking, you talk to those people who have to carry around an oxygen tank and a nasal cannula; those people are strapped to those things for the rest of their lives. If you talk to a heart attack victim, where they need to use IVs and by-pass surgery in order to get their heart working again. If you look at people who cannot even travel to the mountains because they can't breathe at high altitudes, those people are in prison. They are imprisoned by the deadly game of smoking. Unless we do everything we possibly can to dissuade people from smoking, the people who are nonsmokers are going to continue to pay and pay and pay for those individuals who do smoke because it is our dollars which are going to pay for the heart attacks, the IVs, the nasal cannula's and oxygen tanks for those people. Maybe it is selfish, but I can tell you that I know a lot of people who, if they had it to do over again, would never have started smoking in the first place. Nobody tells them that in 60 years from the time they start that they are probably going to end up with emphysema or a heart attack or not being able to breathe. I support this measure and I think everyone should support it. I think this is a good issue.
Senator James:
Thank you, Mr. President. I think the tone of some of the debate on this bill today is reflective of the fact that we do not take this issue seriously. It is easy to make jokes and make light of the efforts of the Judiciary Committee in processing this bill. We were deadly serious when we processed this bill. This is a deadly serious issue. We say, in Nevada, that we hold youth responsible for drinking when they are under age. We should do that since it is a very dangerous thing. Alcohol can be a very dangerous thing, but used responsibly by adults does not have to kill them. Cigarette smoking almost always does. We have taken a turn your head, laissez faire attitude towards smoking by teenagers and young people for many, many years. Every school, such as the high school I attended, had a place they called "cancer corner." Everyone knew it was there and everyone knew the kids were up there smoking. They knew they shouldn't be, but it just "so what smoking" they are just going to die. Well, that is kind of the attitude we are taking here today. Let's just leave it, we won't hold kids responsible, we won't place them in any programs, we won't require them to be responsible for their conduct at all. We have something illegal for them to purchase, but everyone up the line is guilty of some crime if they supply kids with cigarettes. But, the message to the kids is that it is not a problem, they are not going to be responsible so go ahead and do it. We need to do something. We need to do even more than this. I agree with everything the Senator from Carson City said about the bill we passed last session. I voted for it, but after some of the things that have been revealed since that time, I think it is one of the few votes that I regret. We should do a lot more. We have a watered-down cigarette, tobacco enforcement law in this state. We should all face that fact since we all voted for it. Something more needs to be done to address this extremely serious issue. I hope we will have the courage here today to take that step. We were not willing to do anything more concerning retailers, with the amendment. They were here to lobby, but there were no teen lobbyists. If there were one, they would be lobbying in favor of this bill since we need to do something to try to make kids and the adults who supervise them take this issue seriously. Will we ever, or is it just a big joke?
Senator Regan:
Thank you, Mr. President. I rise in response to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Judiciary. I do not think my esteemed colleague from North Las Vegas meant anything comical or joking about this bill. My concern is that, if the Senator who chairs Judiciary, had a cancer group at his high school and the Senator from Carson City has cigarette smokers outside his high school, they should come down to North Las Vegas and the Las Vegas Valley and I will show you kids who are not smoking cigarettes; they are on PCP, LSD, marijuana and heroin. A number of those teenagers are carrying automatic weapons instead of cigarettes, lighters and matches.
In summation, in the last session passed A.B. 622. This is a bill which has been reinforced by the success of a reduction in cigarette sales to teenagers throughout the State of Nevada. The bill has been recognized nationally. The Attorney General has received national awards. We took it back and presented it to the N.C.S.L. committees at the convention in St. Louis. I would urge my colleagues to vote against passage of S.B. 33.
Senator Adler:
Thank you, Mr. President. This is in response to some remarks made previously. Nevada is one of only 14 states with no youth sanction. In terms of our position in the Western states, the states that have youth sanctions are: Utah, Oregon, Washington, California, Arizona and Idaho. All of those states have a lower teen smoking rate than Nevada, by a fairly wide margin.
We need to again focus on the fact that it is not wrong to make these children responsible for their actions. We are not punishing them; we are saying they are in need of supervision. Clearly, a twelve-year-old who is smoking cigarettes is in need of supervision and is in need of counseling. All this bill does is to require them to attend a counseling session. This may be the only way we can get the attention of these children and get them the proper help they need.
Even if this bill only stops 10 percent of teen smokers, in Nevada, it will be a significant amount because one out of three of these teen smokers will eventually die of a tobacco-related disease. Thousands of lives could be saved with passage of this one measure. We need to take this problem seriously. As to whether or not A.B. 622 received an award, that just shows that some national organizations will hand out an award for anything. That is not a very effective bill to prevent smoking by teenagers. We can do a much better job than that and make a stronger statement in the State of Nevada to say that teen smoking is not appropriate. Certainly, juvenile smoking is not appropriate.
Since our previous debate, I was contacted by one of my constituents who lives across the street from one of our middle schools. She told me that she picks up at least 50 cigarette butts every morning thrown down by kids going to school. I do not think this is a situation we should tolerate. All we are asking is that law enforcement be given the opportunity to ticket these children and get them the help they sorely need. For that reason, I would urge your support of this measure.
Senator Titus:
Thank you, Mr. President. The opponents of this bill have said quite a lot about what the Federal Government has done in this area, what other states have done in this area, and what we did in this area last session. But, I haven't heard a single one of them offer any good reason, or any reasons at all for that matter, why we shouldn't pass this measure; why we shouldn't outlaw smoking for children under the age of 18 when we outlaw drinking for children under 18; why we shouldn't prohibit an activity we know is dangerous and expensive, to both individuals and society at large; why we shouldn't hold teenagers accountable for their own actions instead of putting the burden solely on business; and, why we shouldn't do everything we can to save the lives of our children who are our most precious resource.
Senator Neal:
Thank you, Mr. President and members of the Senate. I had not intended to speak on this measure today until, as I was walking through the garage this morning, I noticed the person sweeping the garage had a lot of cigarette butts in his refuse. Recently, I took my car to the shop of a mechanic here in Carson City. I noticed a sign on the mechanic's tool box which said "I am a voter and I smoke." Of course, I inquired as to why he would express himself in that manner. He told me that smoking was a pleasurable thing for him and that he enjoyed it. I asked him if he did not know that smoking cigarettes could kill him. He said he understood that, but when comparing deaths from usage of tobacco with those deaths resulting from automobile accidents, the deaths resulting from cigarette smoking paled in comparison. Now, automobiles are a pleasurable thing to drive, yet approximately 50,000 or more deaths result from automobile accidents throughout the country. The only thing we ask is that better automobiles and roads be created. I said to this gentleman that possibly what is needed is that we should ask for better filters on cigarettes. He thought that would be more in tune.
That conversation I had with the mechanic did not influence my ideas on the subject we have before us today, but rather what we attempted to do in the past. As was indicated, we had A.B. 622 before us last session, and we have not heard any evidence as to whether or not that measure has been a failure. We have not heard any evidence to that effect. Yet, we would like to rush in to penalize children for smoking. On the other hand, the evidence seems to suggest that there has been a reduction in the number of teenage smokers. If that is the case, then why not look at the reason as to why that is happening rather than adding more stringent penalties. That is the reason I am against this particular bill. As I indicated before, I am not a smoker. I have not smoked since I was two years old. That was the end of my smoking days when my grandfather tried me out on Bull Durum tobacco. I lit it up, it stuck to my lip, had to pull it off and it hurt me greatly. That was the end of my smoking days. I have never tried to smoke since that time. I do not have any vested interest in this bill in terms of being a smoker. I am only trying to be objective in looking at this measure. If we already have a law, on the books, which apparently from all the evidence presented indicates that it is working. Why not let that law work and fine tune that law if it is needed rather than to add in more stringent penalties?
Senator Titus:
Thank you, Mr. President. I certainly appreciate the fact of the bumper sticker that says "I smoke and I vote." People who vote are over 18 years of age; they are adults. We are not talking about adults who smoke, voters who smoke, but we are talking about children under the age of eighteen.
Senator Adler:
Thank you, Mr. President. I did not want to speak for the second time, but I would like to point out that 400,000 people a year die in this country from tobacco related diseases and only 50,000 from automobile accidents. So, it a is sizable increase over that last statistic. As to A.B. 622, the statistics indicate that sales to youth have gone down, but we have had a large increase in teenage use of tobacco. I question whether that measure really is working.
Senator Coffin:
Thank you, Mr. President. I want to address my remarks to you and through you to the members of this body and also to the children who are sitting in the upper deck. I want them to listen very carefully to this discussion because I do not want them to think that my vote against this legislation is going to be somehow interpreted in their impressionable minds that they should be smoking. They should not. If they do - they are stupid. I trust that there parents would tell them the same thing. Rest assured, it would be an act of stupidity to smoke at any age.
What I want to say though is that I must rise to the defense of the sponsor of this measure. I remember reading, when the Senator from Carson City brought this bill out, that he was attacked by people who were in favor of stopping teenage smoking because someone said that he brought it out as a measure sponsored and favored by the tobacco industry. I am sure that there is nothing farther from the truth. It shows that all good works will certainly be punished at some time or another. The Senator has been unfairly attacked by people outside this building for that process.
What I really rise in objection to is the means by which the bill would be enforced. I have worried about this aspect ever since I first saw this piece of legislation. Let's take the anecdotal situation which has been expressed such as cigarettes found on the property of someone who happens to live near a school. Fifteen or twenty children congregate on their lawn every morning, smoke there, leave cigarette butts around and it is disgusting. It is sad because you know how stupid they are. Yet, what is going to happen but that the responsibility is going to fall upon law enforcement to literally arrest those kids. In order to give a citation, you have to stop someone. You actually must catch them to give them the citation. I drove by one of our schools last week and I saw a couple of overweight school district police officers sitting in their car. I wondered how many of them would die of a heart attack if they had to chase some of these kids in trying to give them a citation. They would legally be required to do this if we pass this piece of legislation. They would be required to enforce the law as would that husky Metro officer or that officer from Washoe County or Carson City. They are going to have to go after these youths and put the whole force of the law against them even though it is just a citation. I thought that selective enforcement is going to happen since the slowest kid will be caught and all the others will go free.
There are other circumstances. Let's take the 25 or 30 year old individual walking down the street. It is dark and the officer in the car can not really tell how old that person is. He sees that person smoking a cigarette. Maybe he has nothing better to do at that moment and decides he will hassle this person. Maybe the person is black or brown or maybe he just wants to pick on them. He pulls them over and stops. Perhaps he questions the person and finds that he is 25 or 30, stops the action and moves on. But, what if that person decides to run or flee. Maybe that car is unmarked that the officer is driving and the individual is frightened. He takes off and runs. Now, what is going to happen? Is he evading arrest? Is he creating a problem for himself? Is he going to be shot because he is a suspect? There is levity on the floor on that, but it happens every day for other offenses. Why place the police in that kind of position?
I do not know if A.B. 622 is working or not. To my colleagues who are saying it is or isn't, that bill has come under attack. Perhaps it isn't, but let's give it time to work and see. Let's not precipitously jump into something for which the unintended consequences may be far more severe than the honorable intentions that this bill has brought forth to us.
Senators Augustine, Regan and Jacobsen moved the previous question.
Motion carried.
The question being on the passage of Senate Bill No. 33.
Roll call on Senate Bill No. 33:
Yeas -- 13.
Nays -- Augustine, Coffin, Jacobsen, Neal, O'Connell, Regan, Rhoads, Washington--8.
Senate Bill No. 33 having received a constitutional majority, Mr. President declared it passed, as amended.
Bill ordered transmitted to the Assembly.
Senate Bill No. 179.
Bill read third time.
Remarks by Senator Regan.
Roll call on Senate Bill No. 179:
Yeas -- 21.
Nays -- None.
Senate Bill No. 179 having been received a constitutional majority, Mr. President declared it passed.
Bill ordered transmitted to the Assembly.
Assembly Bill No. 39.
Bill read third time.
Remarks by Senators O'Connell, James, Neal, Rawson, Adler and Regan.
Roll call on Assembly Bill No. 39.
Yeas -- 21.
Nays -- None.
Assembly Bill No. 39 having received a constitutional majority, Mr. President declared it passed.
Bill ordered transmitted to the Assembly.
Assembly Bill No. 60.
Bill read third time.
Roll call on Assembly Bill No. 60:
Yeas -- 21.
Nays -- None.
Assembly Bill No. 60 having been received a constitutional majority, Mr. President declared it passed.
Bill ordered transmitted to the Assembly.
Assembly Bill No. 79.
Bill read third time.
Remarks by Senators Neal, James and Adler.
Roll call on Assembly Bill No. 79:
Yeas -- 21.
Nays -- None.
Assembly Bill No. 79 having been received a constitutional majority, Mr. President declared it passed.
Bill ordered transmitted to the Assembly.
MOTIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND NOTICES
Senator Raggio moved that Assembly Bills Nos. 98, 124, 141, 164; Assembly Joint Resolution No. 2; Assembly Joint Resolutions Nos. 13, 17, 33 of the 68th Session be taken from the General File and placed on the General File for the next legislative day.
Motion carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
RECEDE FROM SENATE AMENDMENTS
Senator O'Donnell moved that the Senate do not recede from its action on Assembly Bill No. 15, that a conference be requested, and that Mr. President appoint a first Committee on Conference consisting of three members to meet with a like committee of the Assembly.
Remarks by Senator O'Donnell.
Motion carried.
APPOINTMENT OF CONFERENCE COMMITTEES
Mr. President appointed Senators Washington, Weiner and Jacobsen as a first Committee on Conference to meet with a like committee of the Assembly for the further consideration of Assembly Bill No. 15.
SIGNING OF BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS
There being no objections, the President and Secretary signed Senate Joint Resolution No. 1.
GUESTS EXTENDED PRIVILEGE OF SENATE FLOOR
On request of Senator Jacobsen, the privilege of the floor of the Senate Chamber for this day was extended to the following students from the Scarselli Elementary School: teachers, Sandra Goverley and Mrs. Lisa Fontana, Sarah Benson, Christina Bradshaw, Travis Clanton, Nicole Cleeves, Kenan Copp, Heather Davis, Gigi Delgado, Gina Dore, Adam Flube, Davey Halabuk, Kindal Hartley, Katy Holdeman Kevin Jackson, Chase Johnson, Krystle McKerrihan, Amanda Merrill, Ashley Mitchell, Stephanie Morse, Nathan Newton, Heather Otterbein, Wes Peebles, Aaron Candee, Brittany Pounds, Jamie Scott, Justine Talbott, Holly Thiesen, Matt Thomas, Tynan Tillack, Bryan Allen, Andrew Ramos, Sonya Gahn, Jerry Garcia, Sean Laird, Billy Guffey, Ryan Hammond, Staci Hoogestraat, Bradley Johnson, Bryan Stoehler, Rick Klena, Holly Komons, Chris Madore, Brandon Moore, Patrick Moore, LaShonda Munoz, Sara Murphy, Melissa Oglesby, Jesse Over, Ciarra Proulx, Regina Rojas, Anthony Seghieri, Parnell Springmeyer, James Stockton, Vanessa Wasilchuk, Wesley Weigard; Chaperones: Donna Hartley, Katherine Bradshaw, Tammy Holdeman, Jana McKerrihan, Cerena Cooper, Natalie Benson, Gary Dore, Carolyn Mitchell, Christine Talbott, Mrs. Sandy Stehman, Mrs. Theresa Brocchini, Mrs. Lolita Johnson, Mrs. Peggy Madsen, Mrs. Linda Proulx, Mrs. Letty Ramos and Mrs. Mary Moore.
On request of Senator Washington, the privilege of the floor of the Senate Chamber for this day was extended to the following members of the Governor's Committee on Employment of People With Disabilities: Moshe Bialac, Terri Heenan, Gene Tortelli and Debbra Waite-Lusk.
Senator Raggio moved that the Senate adjourn until Monday, April 7, 1997 at 11 a.m.
Motion carried.
Senate adjourned at 12:15 p.m.
Approved:
Lonnie L. Hammargren, M.D.
President of the Senate
Attest: Janice L. Thomas
Secretary of the Senate