MINUTES OF THE
SENATE Committee on Commerce and Labor
Seventieth Session
May 14, 1999
The Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor was called to order by Chairman Randolph J. Townsend, at 7:00 a.m., on Friday, May 14, 1999, in Room 2135 of the Legislative Building, Carson City, Nevada. Exhibit A is the Agenda. Exhibit B is the Attendance Roster. All exhibits are available and on file at the Research Library of the Legislative Counsel Bureau.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
Senator Randolph J. Townsend, Chairman
Senator Ann O’Connell, Vice Chairman
Senator Mark Amodei
Senator Dean A. Rhoads
Senator Raymond C. Shaffer
Senator Michael A. (Mike) Schneider
Senator Maggie Carlton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
Scott Young, Committee Policy Analyst
John L. Meder, Committee Policy Analyst
Crystal M. Lesbo, Senior Research Analyst
Beverly Willis, Committee Secretary
OTHERS PRESENT:
Susan Hobbes, State Board of Architecture, Interior Design and Residential Design
Vicki Gonzales, Lobbyist, Mirage Resorts Inc.
James L. Wadhams, Lobbyist, State Board of Architecture, Interior Design and Residential Design; and Inex
Robert R. Barengo, Lobbyist, A and H Insurance
Alice A. Molasky-Arman, Commissioner, Division of Insurance, Department of Business and Industry
Samuel P. McMullen, Lobbyist, Nevada State Board of Nursing; Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce; and Retail Association of Nevada
Scott M. Craigie, Lobbyist, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group
Lenard Ormsby, General Counsel, Employers Insurance Company of Nevada
Clifford N. King, Supervisor, Property and Casualty Section, Division of Insurance, Department of Business and Industry
Fred L. Hillerby, Lobbyist, Professional Insurance Agents of California and Nevada
Robert A. Ostrovsky, Lobbyist, Nevada Resort Association
Tony Sanchez, Lobbyist, Peter Eliades2
Robert E. Campbell, Lobbyist, Peter Eliades2,
Senator Townsend opened the meeting with Assembly Bill (A.B.) 204.
ASSEMBLY BILL 204: Revises provisions relating to nursing. (BDR 54-405)
Senator Townsend noted there was a fee in connection with this legislation and proceeded to list several other items in connection with A.B. 204.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 204.
SENATOR CARLTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS AMODEI, SCHNEIDER, AND SHAFFER WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
ASSEMBLY BILL 253: Removes limitation on payment of death benefit for transportation of remains of deceased employee beyond continental limits of United States. (BDR 53-778)
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 253.
SENATOR RHOADS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS AMODEI, SCHNEIDER, AND SHAFFER WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Assembly Bill 283 was the next item to be addressed.
ASSEMBLY BILL 283: Revises provisions governing solicitation by telephone. (BDR 52-743)
Senator Townsend presented a proposed amendment to A.B. 283 (Exhibit C), noting the proposed amendment had been approved by all.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B. 283.
SENATOR RHOADS SECONDED THE MOTION
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS AMODEI, SCHNEIDER, AND SHAFFER WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Senator Townsend then addressed A.B. 555.
ASSEMBLY BILL 555: Partially exempts issuance of charitable-gift annuities from regulation as insurance. (BDR 57-1348)
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 555.
SENATOR CARLTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS AMODEI AND SHAFFER WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
At this time, there was discussion between Senator O’Connell, Senator Townsend, and Scott Young, Principal Research Analyst, Research Division, Legislative Counsel Bureau, pertaining to the parameters of A.B. 283. According to Mr. Young, those still representing sports information services are not removed from regulation under this legislation. Senator O’Connell noted this item had been covered in a previous meeting and indicated this point was to be made very clear, stating, ". . . the intent of the committee is they [sports information services] are not to be removed; they are still under regulation."
The next item to be addressed was A.B. 610.
ASSEMBLY BILL 610: Revises provisions regarding practice of interior design. (BDR 54-1619)
Senator Townsend referred to a proposed amendment to A.B. 610 (Exhibit D). Susan Hobbes, State Board of Architecture, Interior Design and Residential Design, stated she did not have any problems with the proposed amendment.
Senator Carlton, Ms. Hobbes, and Vicki Gonzales, Lobbyist, Mirage Resorts, Inc., discussed the purpose of this proposed amendment. Ms. Gonzales noted the proposed amendment had been offered on behalf of her organization, as there was concern that original language might create loopholes. Ms. Gonzales maintained this language would make sure some entity would be held accountable.
James L Wadhams, Lobbyist, State Board of Architecture, Interior Design and Residential Design, and Inex, explained for Senator Schneider, how this legislation might affect certain educational courses now being offered. Mr. Wadhams claimed A.B. 610 would not obstruct any from practicing in their chosen field.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B. 610 WITH ATTACHMENT K [EXHIBIT D] AS THE AMENDMENT.
SENATOR SCHNEIDER SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATOR AMODEI WAS ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Chairman Townsend opened the hearing on A.B. 632.
ASSEMBLY BILL 632: Makes various changes to provisions governing architects, registered interior designers and residential designers. (BDR 54-404)
Senator Townsend claimed there was a problem with a change to this legislation, citing a proposed fine increase to $15,000, from $10,000. Senator Townsend noted there was a concern this increase could be problematic for small companies. He noted more flexibility was needed to address life-safety issues, indicating this type of violation would need a more substantial penalty. For smaller violations, the $15,000 penalty would not apply.
Mr. Wadhams asserted there was a fine-schedule describing the variation in fines, claiming these fines were proportionate to the seriousness of the offense. He noted all fines were subject to judicial review.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 632.
SENATOR SCHNEIDER SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
* * * * *
Assembly Bill 635 was the next item to be addressed.
ASSEMBLY BILL 635: Provides for regulation of captive insurers. (BDR 57-1329)
According to Chairman Townsend there was not any opposition to this legislation, noting the insurance commissioner did not have any problems with A.B. 635. A proposed amendment was offered (Exhibit E) for this legislation.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B.635 WITH PROPOSED CHANGES BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE AS WELL AS ATTACHMENT L (EXHIBIT E).
SENATOR RHOADS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
* * * * *
Senator Townsend addressed A.B. 680.
ASSEMBLY BILL 680: Makes various changes to provisions relating to insurance. (BDR 57-651)
Senator Townsend referred to a letter, "Political Subdivision With State Self-Insured Health Insurance Plan" (Exhibit F), from Alice A. Molasky-Arman, Commissioner, Division of Insurance, Department of Business and Industry. Senator Townsend offered several other proposed amendments pertaining to A.B. 680; the Nevada Association of Health Plans proposed amendment Exhibit G); an amendment submitted by Mr. Wadhams (Exhibit H); an amendment from Robert R. Barengo, Lobbyist, A and H Insurance (Exhibit I); an amendment from Matthew Sharp, Lobbyist, Frontier Insurance (Exhibit J); with the final amendment (Exhibit K). Chairman Townsend offered a short explanation of each.
Alice A. Molasky-Arman, Commissioner, Division of Insurance, Department of Business and Industry, clarifying for Senator Carlton, stated unadmitted assets would be something like goodwill, or an intangible of some sort.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B. 680 WITH THE AMENDMENTS UNDER ATTACHMENT M (EXHIBIT G, EXHIBIT H, EXHIBIT I, EXHIBIT J, AND EXHIBIT K).
SENATOR SCHNEIDER SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
* * * * *
Chairman Townsend then addressed A.B. 470.
ASSEMBLY BILL 470: Makes various changes concerning provision of benefits for workers’ compensation. (BDR 53-1298)
Senator Townsend directed the committee’s attention to a proposed amendment to A.B. 470 (Exhibit L), proceeding with a review. Samuel P. McMullen, Lobbyist, Nevada State Board of Nursing, Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce, and Retail Association of Nevada, confirmed the Nevada Trial Lawyers’ Association presented this amendment. Senator Townsend then referred to another proposed amendment (Exhibit M). Chairman Townsend reviewed several other proposed amendments (Exhibit N).
Scott M. Craigie, Lobbyist, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, asserted he would withdraw his amendment in favor of a proposed amendment presented previously.
Lenard Ormsby, General Counsel, Employers Insurance Company of Nevada (EICON), remarked on concerns about some insurance companies undercutting the prices of insurance rates. He implied any present contracts should be honored; however, pointing out that if companies do renege, they could be penalized.
Clifford N. King, Supervisor, Property and Casualty Section, Division of Insurance, Department of Business and Industry, commented on tiered rating, noting in order to avoid unfair discrimination, several factors need to be identified; i.e., what type of business, what risk characteristics, and standard industry codes. He claimed each tier would be investigated.
Senator Townsend, Mr. Ormsby and Mr. Craigie continued their comments and clarification pertaining to honoring contracts and penalties that might be incurred should these contracts be broken. Senator Townsend, referring to proposed amendments to A.B. 470 (Exhibit N) and (Exhibit O) questioned Mr. Ormsby about the number of contracts currently held by EICON. Mr. Ormsby declared several million dollars to EICON. He claimed hundreds of Nevada employers were under contract.
Fred L. Hillerby, Lobbyist, Professional Insurance Agents of California and Nevada, noted his support of Exhibit O. He pointed out, in the past, that Nevada has had a monopoly where workers’ compensation insurance is involved. Mr. Hillerby noted other companies from out of state have been writing workers’ compensation insurance for many years and would possess the knowledge needed to write workers’ compensation insurance.
Senator Townsend determined to hold the discussion on A.B. 470 in abeyance while another item was taken under consideration.
Senator Townsend then addressed A.B. 334.
ASSEMBLY BILL 334: Provides for industrial insurance coverage for domestic workers. (BDR 53-86)
Senator Townsend explained this legislation had already been amended; however, he asserted the amendment created several problems. Mr. McMullen asked to, ". . . respectfully withdraw the previous amendment." Mr. McMullen requested the legislation be passed without an amendment.
Senator Carlton stated although she had voted in favor of this legislation before, she could no longer support S.B. 334.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED THE COMMITTEE RESCIND THE PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN ON A.B. 334.
SENATOR RHOADS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATOR SCHNEIDER WAS ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Senator Townsend then asked for a motion to do pass A.B. 334.
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 334.
SENATOR RHOADS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATOR CARLTON VOTED NO. SENATOR SCHNEIDER WAS ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Senator Townsend then addressed an issue pertaining to benefits. Senator Townsend stated:
With regard to any benefit changes that the two houses and the Governor could agree on, based on the administered pricing level the first year; those changes could not occur for the benefits of workers until July 1, 2000; because we are considering that first year as being an administered pricing year; which has already been accounted for. One of the things this committee has done, in a bipartisan manner, is attempted to deal with the Permanent Total Disabled (PTD). The reason being is they are the only ones who are covered by workers’ compensation, whose benefits are set in statute. They are particularly dealt with in statute.
Senator Townsend declared an analysis (Exhibit P) had been prepared, by Crystal M. Lesbo, Senior Research Analyst, Research Division, Legislative Counsel bureau, of PTD in the Nevada, and presented options that might be available. Senator Townsend then referred to facts and figures on page 2 of Exhibit P. To clarify for Senator Townsend, Ms. Lesbo provided an explanation how she had arrived at these findings. Mr. Ormsby joined the discussion addressing concerns on ways of funding an increase of benefits. Mr. Ormsby emphasized problems associated with financing and increase in benefits and also focused on prospective dates for any rate and/or benefit increase. Senator Townsend noted he wanted to alert the committee on the substantial impact of this situation.
Chairman Townsend recessed the meeting at 9:00 a.m.
Chairman Townsend reconvened the meeting at 10:20 a.m.
Senator Townsend, directing remarks to Ms. Molasky-Arman, stated:
For purposes of an amendment for A.B. 470 that the committee will consider the effects of the term ‘file and use’ in lost cost. Currently in the law, as we have stated, the first year of administrative pricing runs three additional years, with variances, for those three years. I would propose that we have a variance in the second year and then go to file and use. I want to make sure, and get it on the record, and just as importantly, make sure it is in the amendment, if the committee chooses to process it; exactly what ‘file and use,’ and ‘lost cost,’ not only is used in the context that we traditionally use it in; but I want to make sure that you have the appropriate authority, and that we do not draft this incorrectly; nor do we have a misunderstanding among all the parties, and this committee, regarding the following issue.
Senator Townsend continued his remarks to Ms. Molasky-Arman:
That is your ability under the file-and-use system, whatever date we set, to deal with this in a manner that, in a new competitive world, is appropriately regulated. . . . When we propose this amendment, do we need to say file and use? Do we need to say lost cost? Do we need say both? Do you need regulatory authority to deal with this? What do you need to have in statute, so when the date that goes to file and use is put in, you can deal with it appropriately?
Senator Townsend indicated he had been referring to Exhibit P.
Ms. Molasky-Arman declared language offered in a proposed amendment to A.B. 470 (Exhibit Q) clearly states what filings are to consist of; it describes and defines lost cost. She claimed it indicated the nature of the filings the insurers would be filing with the insurance division.
Senator Townsend proposed amending A.B. 470 with language from Exhibit L as well as Exhibit M that deals with the laboratory testing issue. He included language necessary in order to accommodate the following, "The current law says administered pricing is July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000, followed by July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001, with a deviation of 15 percent." Senator Townsend continued, "July 1, 2001, thereafter, being the file-and-use/lost-cost language that is submitted."
SENATOR O’CONNELL MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B.470 WITH LANGUAGE FROM EXHIBIT L AND EXHIBIT M. THE CURRENT LAW SAYS ADMINISTERED PRICING IS JULY 1, 1999 TO JUNE 30, 2000, FOLLOWED BY JULY 1, 2000 TO JUNE 30, 2001, WITH A DEVIATION OF 15 PERCENT. JULY 1, 2001, THEREAFTER, BEING THE FILE-AND-USE/LOST-COST LANGUAGE.
SENATOR RHOADS SECONDED THE MOTION.
To reassure Senator Carlton, a number of involved participants expressed their concurrence with conditions pertaining to A.B. 470. Those responding were Mr. Wadhams, Mr. Ormsby, Mr. McMullen and Mr. Hillerby. Robert A. Ostrovsky, Lobbyist, Nevada Resort Association, also noted his support.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
* * * * *
Senator Schneider reported on the successful completion of legislation dealing with homeowners’ associations.
The next piece of legislation to be addressed was A.B. 293.
ASSEMBLY BILL 293: Makes various changes concerning health insurers. (BDR 57-1429)
Chairman Townsend presented an amendment to A.B. 293 (Exhibit R). He noted this amendment supplemented A.B. 293 with language from mental health parity legislation, that had not been voted into law.
SENATOR RHOADS MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B. 293 WITH THE MENTAL HEALTH PARITY AMENDMENT (EXHIBIT R).
SENATOR CARLTON SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATOR O’CONNELL VOTED NO.)
* * * * *
The next item offered for consideration by the committees was A.B. 193.
ASSEMBLY BILL 193: Revises provisions governing use of device for automatic dialing and announcing on telephone. (BDR 52-84)
Tony Sanchez, Lobbyist, Peter Eliades2, presented an amendment (Exhibit S) to A.B. 193. Senator Townsend requested an explanation pertaining to various rules and regulations, as well as county and city ordinances relating to this legislation. Mr. Sanchez explained under existing law the Taxicab Authority has the ability to discipline the driver of a taxicab for accepting money for any reason other than transportation of passengers. He declared city and county ordinances prohibited a business with a liquor license from paying a taxicab driver. Mr. Sanchez asserted the proposed amendment would give the Department of Business and Industry, the ability to monitor and penalize the business violating this edict, as well as the taxicab driver.
Senator Amodei gave details to Senator O’Connell on reasoning behind this legislation and the proposed amendment. He emphasized this legislation would have an enforcement target of specific business owners along with the taxicab drivers. Senator Amodei noted violations, of this type, would be administered by the Taxicab Authority, with passage of A.B. 193.
Robert E. Campbell, Lobbyist, Peter Eliades2, offered clarification on the severity of this problem by noting the Taxicab Authority, with help from various other groups, found this problem was occurring in excess of 30 percent of cab rides.
Senator Amodei clarified by asserting this figure of "30 percent," was 30 percent of cab rides to adult cabarets or exotic dance establishments, not 30 percent of all cab rides.
SENATOR RHOADS MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B. 193.
SENATOR AMODEI SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
* * * * *
Chairman Townsend recessed the meeting at 11:05 a.m.
Chairman Townsend reconvened the meeting at 6:10 p.m. The first item to be addressed was A.B. 60.
ASSEMBLY BILL 60: Makes various changes concerning health care services related to contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy. (BDR 57-181)
SENATOR CARLTON MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 60.
SENATOR AMODEI SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS SCHNEIDER, RHOADS AND O’CONNELL WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Senator Townsend then called for action on A.B. 515.
ASSEMBLY BILL 515: Provides that policy of health insurance must include provisions allowing woman who is covered to have direct access to certain health care services for women. (BDR 57-254)
SENATOR CARLTON MOVED TO DO PASS A.B. 515.
SENATOR AMODEI SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS SCHNEIDER, RHOADS AND O’CONNELL WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
At this time, Senator Townsend determined to address A.B. 431.
ASSEMBLY BILL 431: Provides additional protections to individual buyers, lessees, borrowers and of workers’ compensation benefits. (BDR 52-182)
Senator Townsend noted that Assemblywoman Barbara E. Buckley, Clark County Assembly District No. 8, requested A.B. 431 be amended in the following manner. Senator Townsend asserted Assemblywoman Buckley had asked for the removal of sections 11 through 18. She also requested that sections 22, 23, and 24 be eliminated. Senator Townsend recommended the deletion of sections 2 and 3. Senator Townsend clarified several other changes requested by Assemblywoman Buckley.
SENATOR SHAFFER MOVED TO AMEND AND DO PASS A.B. 431 WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED AMENDMENTS.
SENATOR AMODEI SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED. (SENATORS O’CONNELL AND RHOADS WERE ABSENT FOR THE VOTE.)
* * * * *
Senator Townsend declared, "I am in the automobile industry and I think anything that can enhance the way that industry ought to be run, is positive for everyone."
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
Beverly Willis,
Committee Secretary
APPROVED BY:
Senator Randolph J. Townsend, Chairman
DATE:
A.B.193 Revises provisions governing use of device for automatic dialing and announcing on telephone. (BDR 52-84)
A.B.204 Revises provisions relating to nursing. (BDR 54-405)
A.B.253 Removes limitation on payment of death benefit for transportation of remains of deceased employee beyond continental limits of United States. (BDR 53-778)
A.B.283 Revises provisions governing solicitation by telephone. (BDR 52-743)
A.B.293 Makes various changes concerning health insurers. (BDR 57-1429)
A.B.334 Provides for industrial insurance coverage for domestic workers. (BDR 53-86)
A.B.470 Makes various changes concerning provision of benefits for workers’ compensation and filing of rates for industrial insurance. (BDR 53-1298)
A.B.555 Partially exempts issuance of charitable-gift annuities from regulation as insurance. (BDR 57-1348)
A.B.610 Revises provisions regarding practice of interior design. (BDR 54-1619)
A.B.632 Makes various changes to provisions governing architects, registered interior designers and residential designers. (BDR 54-404)
A.B.635 Provides for regulation of captive insurers. (BDR 57-1329)
A.B.680 Makes various changes to provisions relating to insurance. (BDR 57-651)
A.B.60 Makes various changes concerning health care services related to contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy. (BDR 57-181)
A.B.515 Makes various changes relating to services covered by policies of health insurance and health care plans. (BDR 57-254)
A.B.431 Revises protections provided to individual buyers, lessees, guests of public accommodations and recipients of workers’ compensation benefits. (BDR 52-182)