Assembly Bill No. 287–Assemblymen Segerblom, Gibbons, Williams, Parks, Buckley, Manendo, Freeman, de Braga, Collins, Berman, Neighbors, Tiffany, Evans, Cegavske, Anderson, Goldwater, Gustavson, Humke, Price, Giunchigliani, Mortenson, Claborn, Hettrick, Angle, Nolan, Carpenter and Beers
February 22, 1999
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing proceedings and awards in actions relating to eminent domain. (BDR 3-729)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: No.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in
bolded italics is new; matter between brackets
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1
Section 1. Chapter 37 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a1-2
new section to read as follows:1-3
All proceedings in all courts brought under this chapter to exercise the1-4
right of eminent domain take precedence over all other causes and1-5
actions not involving the public interest, to the end that all such1-6
proceedings must be quickly heard and determined.1-7
Sec. 2. NRS 37.120 is hereby amended to read as follows: 37.120 1. To assess compensation and damages as provided in NRS1-9
37.110, the date of the first service of the summons is the date of valuation,1-10
except that2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
2-7
2-8
makes a written finding that the delay is caused primarily by the2-9
2-10
2-11
calendar of the court, the date of valuation is2-12
2-13
2-14
ordered by a court, the date of valuation used in the new trial must be the2-15
date of valuation used in the original trial.2-16
2. No improvements put upon the property after the date of the service2-17
of the summons may be included in the assessment of compensation or2-18
damages, regardless of the date of valuation.2-19
3. As used in this section, "primarily" means the greater amount,2-20
quantity or quality of acts of the plaintiff or the defendant or, if there is2-21
more than one defendant, the total delay caused by all the defendants, that2-22
would cause the date of the trial to be continued past 2 years after the2-23
2-24
Sec. 3. NRS 37.175 is hereby amended to read as follows: 37.175 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the plaintiff2-26
shall pay interest on the final judgment on the difference between the2-27
amount deposited pursuant to NRS 37.100 or 37.170 and the sum of the2-28
amount awarded for the taking and any damages awarded for the severance2-29
of the property, excluding costs and attorney’s fees,2-30
2-31
2-32
2-33
2-34
2-35
2-36
2-37
2-38
2-39
2-40
2-41
2-42
2-43
3-1
3-2
3-3
the judgment is satisfied, at the rate provided in NRS 17.130.3-4
2. The plaintiff is not required to pay interest on any amount deposited3-5
pursuant to the provisions of NRS 37.100 or 37.170.3-6
3. No interest is required to be paid for the period from the date of a3-7
trial which is continued past 2 years after the3-8
3-9
judgment, if the continuance was caused primarily by the defendant or, if3-10
there is more than one defendant, the total delay caused by all the3-11
defendants. As used in this subsection , "primarily" means the greater3-12
amount, quantity or quality of acts of the plaintiff or the defendant or, if3-13
there is more than one defendant, the total delay caused by all defendants ,3-14
that would cause the trial to be continued past 2 years after the3-15
~