Assembly Joint Resolution No. 15–Committee on
Health and Human Services
FILE NUMBER........
ASSEMBLY JOINT RESOLUTION—Urging Congress to rectify inequities that occur
between federal and state regulatory agencies regarding the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 as it relates to appeals processes.
Whereas, On May 19, 1998, testimony was presented to members of
the United States Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources by the
Honorable Marilyn R. Goldwater, Deputy Majority Whip in the Maryland
House of Delegates, urging members of Congress to strengthen
requirements for the appeals processes for plans covered by the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA); and
Whereas, In her presentation, Ms. Goldwater noted that it is important
to have strong, effective and responsive internal grievance and appeal
mechanisms in place; and
Whereas, Every state requires managed care entities to have an internal
appeals process in place; and
Whereas, If it is determined that a federal external appeals process is
appropriate, it should be administered by the Federal Government
according to rules established by federal law, with states managing those
plans under their regulatory authority; and
Whereas, Several states have enacted legislation to revise and refine
both the internal and external appeals processes; and
Whereas, In Maryland, legislation was enacted to strengthen the state’s
internal grievance and appeals processes, establish an external appeal
mechanism and provide additional regulatory authority to the state’s
insurance commissioner over medical directors in health maintenance
organizations; and
Whereas, In Florida, the nation’s first external review process was
created in 1985, and Florida continues to fine tune its process by utilizing a
panel of six state employees for the external review process, with explicit
time frames from "extreme emergency" cases to "nonurgent" cases; and
Whereas, New Jersey enacted legislation in 1997 that requires health
maintenance organizations to establish an external appeal process and now
operates a consumer hot line for consumer questions and complaints; and
Whereas, Texas enacted landmark legislation in 1998 that permits
managed care enrollees to sue their health plans for malpractice in cases
where they have been harmed by a plan’s decision to delay or deny
treatment; and
Whereas, According to The Best From the States II: The Text of Key
State HMO Consumer Protection Provisions by Families USA Foundation
(October 1998), key consumer protection provisions include the
establishment of explicit time frames for appeal of decisions,
implementation of methods for expediting the review of emergency and
urgent care situations, acceptance of oral appeals and adoption of laws that
require reviewers to be health care providers with expertise in the clinical
area being reviewed and that prohibits reviewers from participating in the
review of cases in which they were involved in the original decisions; and
Whereas, On February 9, 1999, in a letter to the editor of the Las
Vegas Sun, Marie Soldo, immediate past Chairman of the Nevada
Association of Health Plans, wrote that, because the state has limited
jurisdiction regarding the regulation of health insurance plans, more than
two-thirds of Nevadans, including state and federal employees, Medicare
and Medicaid enrollees and others whose employers are self-insured, are
not affected by state legislative action such as mandated benefits, improved
grievance and appeals processes and the proposed ombudsman office; now,
therefore, be it
Resolved by the Assembly and Senate of the State of Nevada,
Jointly, That the Nevada Legislature hereby urges Congress to take steps
to ensure that those plans which are exempt from state regulation provide
adequate protection provisions for persons covered by such health plans;
and be it further
Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly prepare and transmit a
copy of this resolution to the Vice President of the United States as the
presiding officer of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives
and each member of the Nevada Congressional Delegation; and be it
further
Resolved, That this resolution becomes effective upon passage and
approval.