Senate Bill No. 189–Committee on Judiciary

(On Behalf of Attorney General)

February 15, 1999

____________

Referred to Committee on Judiciary

 

SUMMARY—Provides that public records concerning certain procedures are not inadmissible under hearsay rule. (BDR 4-464)

FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.

Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: No.

~

EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted. Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).

 

AN ACT relating to evidence; providing that a public record concerning a procedure which is routinely conducted by or at the request of a public official or agency and that produces objective results is not inadmissible under the hearsay rule; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

1-1 Section 1. NRS 50.315 is hereby amended to read as follows:

1-2 50.315 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 6 and 7, the

1-3 affidavit or declaration of a person is admissible in evidence in any

1-4 criminal or administrative proceeding to prove:

1-5 (a) That the affiant or declarant has been certified by the director of the

1-6 department of motor vehicles and public safety as being competent to

1-7 operate devices of a type certified by the committee on testing for

1-8 intoxication as accurate and reliable for testing a person’s breath to

1-9 determine the amount by weight of alcohol in his breath;

1-10 (b) The identity of a person from whom the affiant or declarant obtained

1-11 a sample of breath; and

1-12 (c) That the affiant or declarant tested the sample using a device of a

1-13 type so certified and that the device was functioning properly.

1-14 2. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 6 and 7, the affidavit or

1-15 declaration of a person who prepared a chemical solution or gas that has

2-1 been used in calibrating a device for testing another’s breath to determine

2-2 the amount of alcohol in his breath is admissible in evidence in any

2-3 criminal or administrative proceeding to prove:

2-4 (a) The occupation of the affiant or declarant; and

2-5 (b) That the solution or gas has the chemical composition necessary for

2-6 accurately calibrating it.

2-7 3. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 6 and 7, the affidavit or

2-8 declaration of a person who calibrates a device for testing another’s breath

2-9 to determine the amount of alcohol in his breath is admissible in evidence

2-10 in any criminal or administrative proceeding to prove:

2-11 (a) The occupation of the affiant or declarant;

2-12 (b) That on a specified date the affiant or declarant calibrated the device

2-13 at a named law enforcement agency by using the procedures and equipment

2-14 prescribed in the regulations of the committee on testing for intoxication;

2-15 (c) That the calibration was performed within the period required by the

2-16 committee’s regulations; and

2-17 (d) Upon completing the calibration of the device, it was operating

2-18 properly.

2-19 4. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 6 and 7, the affidavit or

2-20 declaration made under the penalty of perjury of a person who withdraws a

2-21 sample of blood from another for analysis by an expert as set forth in NRS

2-22 50.320 is admissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding to prove:

2-23 (a) The occupation of the affiant or declarant;

2-24 (b) The identity of the person from whom the affiant or declarant

2-25 withdrew the sample;

2-26 (c) The fact that the affiant or declarant kept the sample in his sole

2-27 custody or control and in substantially the same condition as when he first

2-28 obtained it until delivering it to another; and

2-29 (d) The identity of the person to whom the affiant or declarant delivered

2-30 it.

2-31 5. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 6 and 7, the affidavit or

2-32 declaration of a person who receives from another a sample of blood or

2-33 urine or other tangible evidence that is alleged to contain alcohol or a

2-34 controlled substance, chemical, poison or organic solvent may be admitted

2-35 in any criminal, civil or administrative proceeding to prove:

2-36 (a) The occupation of the affiant or declarant;

2-37 (b) The fact that the affiant or declarant received a sample or other

2-38 evidence from another person and kept it in his sole custody or control in

2-39 substantially the same condition as when he first received it until delivering

2-40 it to another; and

2-41 (c) The identity of the person to whom the affiant or declarant delivered

2-42 it.

3-1 6. [If,] Except as otherwise provided in subsection 9, if, at or before

3-2 the time of the trial, the defendant establishes that:

3-3 (a) There is a substantial and bona fide dispute regarding the facts in the

3-4 affidavit or declaration; and

3-5 (b) It is in the best interests of justice that the witness who signed the

3-6 affidavit or declaration be cross-examined,

3-7 the court may order the prosecution to produce the witness and may

3-8 continue the trial for any time the court deems reasonably necessary to

3-9 receive such testimony. The time within which a trial is required is

3-10 extended by the time of the continuance.

3-11 7. [During] Except as otherwise provided in subsection 9, during any

3-12 trial in which the defendant has been accused of committing a felony, the

3-13 defendant may object in writing to admitting into evidence an affidavit or

3-14 declaration described in this section. If the defendant makes such an

3-15 objection, the court shall not admit the affidavit or declaration into

3-16 evidence and the prosecution may cause the person to testify in court to any

3-17 information contained in the affidavit or declaration.

3-18 8. The committee on testing for intoxication shall adopt regulations

3-19 prescribing the form of the affidavits and declarations described in this

3-20 section.

3-21 9. The provisions of subsections 6 and 7 do not apply to an affidavit

3-22 or declaration that is admitted pursuant to NRS 51.155.

3-23 Sec. 2. NRS 50.320 is hereby amended to read as follows:

3-24 50.320 1. The affidavit or declaration of a chemist and any other

3-25 person who has qualified in the district court of any county to testify as an

3-26 expert witness regarding the presence in the breath, blood or urine of a

3-27 person of alcohol, a controlled substance, or a chemical, poison or organic

3-28 solvent, or the identity or quantity of a controlled substance alleged to have

3-29 been in the possession of a person, which is submitted to prove:

3-30 (a) The quantity of the purported controlled substance; or

3-31 (b) The amount of alcohol or the presence or absence of a controlled

3-32 substance, chemical, poison or organic solvent, as the case may be,

3-33 is admissible in the manner provided in this section.

3-34 2. An affidavit or declaration which is submitted to prove any fact set

3-35 forth in subsection 1 must be admitted into evidence when submitted during

3-36 any administrative proceeding, preliminary hearing or hearing before a

3-37 grand jury. The court shall not sustain any objection to the admission of

3-38 such an affidavit or declaration.

3-39 3. [The] Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the

3-40 defendant may object in writing to admitting into evidence an affidavit or

3-41 declaration submitted to prove any fact set forth in subsection 1 during his

3-42 trial. If the defendant makes such an objection, the court shall not admit the

3-43 affidavit or declaration into evidence and the prosecution may cause the

4-1 person to testify in court to any information contained in the affidavit or

4-2 declaration. The provisions of this subsection do not apply to an affidavit

4-3 or declaration that is admitted pursuant to NRS 51.155.

4-4 4. The committee on testing for intoxication shall adopt regulations

4-5 prescribing the form of the affidavits and declarations described in this

4-6 section.

4-7 Sec. 3. NRS 50.325 is hereby amended to read as follows:

4-8 50.325 1. If a person is charged with an offense punishable pursuant

4-9 to chapter 453, 484 or 488 of NRS or homicide resulting from driving,

4-10 operating or being in actual physical control of a vehicle or a vessel under

4-11 power or sail while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a controlled

4-12 substance or a chemical, poison or organic solvent, and it is necessary to

4-13 prove:

4-14 (a) The existence of any alcohol;

4-15 (b) The quantity of a controlled substance; or

4-16 (c) The existence or identity of a controlled substance, chemical, poison

4-17 or organic solvent,

4-18 the prosecuting attorney may request that the affidavit or declaration of an

4-19 expert or other person described in NRS 50.315 and 50.320 be admitted

4-20 into evidence at the trial or preliminary hearing concerning the offense.

4-21 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 50.315 and 50.320, the affidavit or

4-22 declaration must be admitted into evidence.

4-23 2. If the request is to have the affidavit or declaration admitted into

4-24 evidence at a preliminary hearing or hearing before a grand jury, the

4-25 affidavit or declaration must be admitted into evidence upon submission.

4-26 [If]

4-27 3. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, if the request is to

4-28 have the affidavit or declaration admitted into evidence at trial, the request

4-29 must be:

4-30 (a) Made at least 10 days before the date set for the trial;

4-31 (b) Sent to the defendant’s counsel and to the defendant, by registered or

4-32 certified mail by the prosecuting attorney; and

4-33 (c) Accompanied by a copy of the affidavit or declaration and the name,

4-34 address and telephone number of the affiant or declarant.

4-35 [3.]

4-36 The provisions of this subsection do not apply to an affidavit or

4-37 declaration that is admitted pursuant to NRS 51.155.

4-38 4. The provisions of this section do not prohibit either party from

4-39 producing any witness to offer testimony at trial.

4-40 Sec. 4. NRS 51.155 is hereby amended to read as follows:

4-41 51.155 1. Records, reports, statements or data compilations, in any

4-42 form, of public officials or agencies are not inadmissible under the hearsay

4-43 rule if they set forth:

5-1 [1.] (a) The activities of the official or agency;

5-2 [2.] (b) Matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law; or

5-3 [3.] (c) In civil cases and against the state in criminal cases, factual

5-4 findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted

5-5 by law,

5-6 unless the sources of information or the method or circumstances of the

5-7 investigation indicate lack of trustworthiness.

5-8 2. Records, reports, statements or data compilations, in any form,

5-9 that are created by or at the request of a public official or agency are not

5-10 inadmissible under the hearsay rule if they are related to a procedure

5-11 that is routinely conducted by or at the request of the public official or

5-12 agency and that produces objective results, including, without limitation,

5-13 records, reports, statements or data compilations related to the

5-14 calibration of a device used to test the breath of a person to determine the

5-15 amount of alcohol in his breath.

5-16 Sec. 5. The amendatory provisions of this act do not apply to offenses

5-17 committed before October 1, 1999.

~