Senate Bill No. 208–Committee on Transportation
February 17, 1999
____________
Referred to Committee on Transportation
SUMMARY—Requires immobilization of vehicle of person driving under influence of intoxicating liquor or controlled substance under certain circumstances. (BDR 43-189)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: Yes.
Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: Yes.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in
bolded italics is new; matter between brackets
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1
Section 1. Chapter 484 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto1-2
the provisions set forth as sections 2 to 7, inclusive, of this act.1-3
Sec. 2. "Immobilization device" means:1-4
1. A device that may be clamped or locked onto a wheel or the1-5
steering wheel of a vehicle to prevent the vehicle from being moved; or1-6
2. Any other device that may be used to prevent a vehicle from being1-7
moved.1-8
Sec. 3. 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, the officer1-9
who obtained the result of a test given pursuant to NRS 484.382 or1-10
484.383 shall, as an agent for the department:1-11
(a) Immediately serve an order of immobilization upon a person who1-12
has 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood or has a1-13
detectable amount of a controlled substance in his system;1-14
(b) Seize the vehicle that the person was driving and have the vehicle1-15
immobilized pursuant to the procedure set forth in subsection 2; and2-1
(c) Advise the person of his right to administrative and judicial review2-2
of the immobilization.2-3
2. After seizing a vehicle pursuant to subsection 1, the officer shall2-4
ensure that the vehicle is:2-5
(a) Removed to and stored at the residence of the owner of the vehicle2-6
or at another safe location; and2-7
(b) Immobilized with an immobilization device.2-8
3. The officer shall not seize the vehicle if the vehicle is:2-9
(a) Stolen;2-10
(b) Rented or leased;2-11
(c) Owned by a foreign government, the Federal Government, a state2-12
government or a political subdivision of a state government; or2-13
(d) Owned by a business and was being driven for a business related2-14
purpose.2-15
4. After seizing and immobilizing a vehicle pursuant to this section,2-16
the officer shall indicate on the certificate required pursuant to2-17
subsection 2 of NRS 484.385 whether he served an order of2-18
immobilization upon the person.2-19
5. Except as otherwise provided in section 4 of this act, the person2-20
who was driving a vehicle that was immobilized pursuant to this section2-21
shall pay all reasonable costs associated with the immobilization of the2-22
vehicle, including, without limitation, the cost of towing the vehicle,2-23
storing the vehicle, and installing and removing the immobilization2-24
device, before the immobilization device is removed.2-25
Sec. 4. 1. If the owner of a vehicle was the driver of the vehicle at2-26
the time the vehicle was seized pursuant to section 3 of this act, he may,2-27
at any time during the period of immobilization, request a hearing by the2-28
department to review the order of immobilization.2-29
2. The hearing:2-30
(a) Must be conducted within 15 days after receipt of the request, or as2-31
soon thereafter as is practicable, in the county where the person resides,2-32
unless the parties agree otherwise; and2-33
(b) May be combined with a hearing to review an order of revocation2-34
held pursuant to NRS 484.387.2-35
3. The director or his agent may issue subpoenas for the attendance2-36
of witnesses and the production of relevant books and papers.2-37
4. The scope of the hearing must be limited to the issue of whether2-38
the person, at the time of the test, had 0.10 percent or more by weight of2-39
alcohol in his blood or a detectable amount of a controlled substance in2-40
his system.2-41
5. If the department finds that, at the time of the test, the person:3-1
(a) Had 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood or a3-2
detectable amount of a controlled substance in his system, the3-3
department shall affirm the order of immobilization.3-4
(b) Did not have 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his3-5
blood or a detectable amount of a controlled substance in his system, the3-6
department shall rescind the order of immobilization, order the3-7
immobilization device removed from the vehicle and pay or reimburse3-8
the person for all costs that the person reasonably incurred as a result of3-9
the immobilization.3-10
6. If the department affirms the order of immobilization, the person3-11
may petition for judicial review pursuant to the procedures set forth in3-12
chapter 233B of NRS.3-13
7. If, at any time, the case against the person is dismissed or the3-14
person is acquitted of the charges, the department shall rescind the order3-15
of immobilization, order the immobilization device removed from the3-16
vehicle and pay or reimburse the person for all costs that the person3-17
reasonably incurred as a result of the immobilization.3-18
Sec. 5. 1. If the owner of a vehicle was not the driver at the time3-19
the vehicle was seized pursuant to section 3 of this act, the owner may, at3-20
any time during the subsequent period of immobilization, submit a3-21
written petition to the department to rescind the order of immobilization3-22
and remove the immobilization device from the vehicle.3-23
2. The department:3-24
(a) Shall rescind the order of immobilization and order the3-25
immobilization device removed from the vehicle if the owner proves by a3-26
preponderance of the evidence that he did not consent to the operation of3-27
the vehicle by the person who was driving the vehicle at the time the3-28
vehicle was seized.3-29
(b) May rescind the order of immobilization and order the3-30
immobilization device removed from the vehicle if the owner proves by a3-31
preponderance of the evidence that his immediate family owns only one3-32
vehicle and will suffer a substantial hardship if the vehicle is immobilized3-33
for 30 days.3-34
Sec. 6. 1. Nothing in sections 2 to 6, inclusive, of this act may be3-35
construed to impede or infringe upon the rights of a valid lienholder on3-36
the vehicle to cure a default pursuant to an existing security agreement.3-37
2. A lienholder is not liable for any costs related to an3-38
immobilization.3-39
3. If a lienholder repossesses and removes a vehicle that has been3-40
immobilized, the state shall pay all reasonable costs related to the3-41
immobilization to the extent that those costs have not been paid by the3-42
person who was driving the vehicle at the time it was seized.4-1
4. If the state pays any expenses related to immobilization pursuant4-2
to this section, the state may recover those expenses from the person who4-3
was driving the vehicle at the time it was seized.4-4
Sec. 7. An owner of a vehicle who authorizes the operation of the4-5
vehicle by a person whom the owner knows has had his:4-6
1. License, permit or privilege to drive revoked pursuant to NRS4-7
484.385; or4-8
2. Vehicle immobilized pursuant to section 3 of this act,4-9
is guilty of a misdemeanor.4-10
Sec. 8. NRS 484.013 is hereby amended to read as follows: 484.013 As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,4-12
the words and terms defined in NRS 484.0135 to 484.217, inclusive, and4-13
section 2 of this act have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.4-14
Sec. 9. NRS 484.382 is hereby amended to read as follows: 484.382 1. Any person who drives or is in actual physical control of4-16
a vehicle on a highway or on premises to which the public has access shall4-17
be deemed to have given his consent to a preliminary test of his breath for4-18
the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his breath when the test4-19
is administered at the direction of a police officer at the scene of a vehicle4-20
accident or collision or where he stops a vehicle, if the officer has4-21
reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be tested was driving or in4-22
actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of4-23
intoxicating liquor or a controlled substance.4-24
2. If the person fails to submit to the test, the officer shall seize his4-25
license or permit to drive as provided in NRS 484.385 , seize and4-26
immobilize the vehicle as provided in section 3 of this act, and arrest him4-27
and take him to a convenient place for the administration of a reasonably4-28
available evidentiary test under NRS 484.383.4-29
3. The result of the preliminary test must not be used in any criminal4-30
action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.4-31
Sec. 10. NRS 484.384 is hereby amended to read as follows:4-32
484.384 1. If the result of a test given under NRS 484.382 or4-33
484.383 shows that a person had 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol4-34
in his blood at the time of the test4-35
controlled substance in his system:4-36
(a) His license, permit or privilege to drive must be revoked as provided4-37
in NRS 484.385 and he is not eligible for a license, permit or privilege for a4-38
period of 90 days4-39
(b) The vehicle that the person was driving must be immobilized for a4-40
period of 30 days as set forth in sections 3 and 4 of this act.4-41
2. If a revocation of a person’s license, permit or privilege to drive4-42
under NRS 62.227 or 483.460 follows a revocation under subsection 14-43
which was based on his having 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol5-1
in his blood, the department shall cancel the revocation under that5-2
subsection and give the person credit for any period during which he was5-3
not eligible for a license, permit or privilege.5-4
3. Periods of ineligibility for a license, permit or privilege to drive5-5
which are imposed pursuant to this section must run consecutively.5-6
Sec. 11. NRS 484.387 is hereby amended to read as follows: 484.387 1. At any time while a person is not eligible for a license,5-8
permit or privilege to drive following an order of revocation issued5-9
pursuant to NRS 484.385, he may request in writing a hearing by the5-10
department to review the order of revocation, but he is only entitled to one5-11
hearing. The hearing must be conducted within 15 days after receipt of the5-12
request, or as soon thereafter as is practicable, in the county where the5-13
requester resides unless the parties agree otherwise. The hearing may be5-14
combined with a hearing to review an order of immobilization held5-15
pursuant to section 4 of this act. The director or his agent may issue5-16
subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of relevant5-17
books and papers and may require a reexamination of the requester. The5-18
department shall issue an additional temporary license for a period which is5-19
sufficient to complete the administrative review.5-20
2. The scope of the hearing must be limited to the issue of whether the5-21
person, at the time of the test, had 0.10 percent or more by weight of5-22
alcohol in his blood or a detectable amount of a controlled substance in his5-23
system. Upon an affirmative finding on this issue, the department shall5-24
affirm the order of revocation. Otherwise, the order of revocation must be5-25
rescinded.5-26
3. If, after the hearing, the order of revocation is affirmed, the person5-27
whose license, privilege or permit has been revoked is entitled to a review5-28
of the same issues in district court in the same manner as provided by5-29
chapter 233B of NRS. The court shall notify the department upon the5-30
issuance of a stay and the department shall issue an additional temporary5-31
license for a period which is sufficient to complete the review.5-32
4. If a hearing officer grants a continuance of a hearing at the request5-33
of the person whose license was revoked, or a court does so after issuing a5-34
stay of the revocation, the officer or court shall notify the department, and5-35
the department shall cancel the temporary license and notify the holder by5-36
mailing the order of cancellation to his last known address.5-37
Sec. 12. The amendatory provisions of this act do not apply to5-38
offenses that were committed before October 1, 1999.~