Senate Bill No. 262–Committee on Taxation
February 26, 1999
____________
Referred to Committee on Taxation
SUMMARY—Creates presumption that certain tangible personal property initially used in interstate or foreign commerce outside this state was not purchased for storage, use or other consumption in this state. (BDR 32-940)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: No.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in
bolded italics is new; matter between brackets
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1
Section 1. Chapter 372 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a1-2
new section to read as follows:1-3
1. It is presumed that tangible personal property delivered outside1-4
this state to a purchaser was not purchased from a retailer for storage,1-5
use or other consumption in this state if the property:1-6
(a) Was first used in interstate or foreign commerce outside this state;1-7
and1-8
(b) Is used continuously in interstate or foreign commerce, but not1-9
exclusively in this state, for at least 12 months after the date that the1-10
property was first used pursuant to paragraph (a).1-11
2. As used in this section:1-12
(a) "Interstate or foreign commerce" means the transportation of1-13
passengers or property between:1-14
(1) A point in one state and a point in:1-15
(I) Another state;1-16
(II) A possession or territory of the United States; or1-17
(III) A foreign country; or2-1
(2) Points in the same state when such transportation consists of2-2
one or more segments of transportation that immediately follow2-3
movement of the property into the state from a point beyond its borders2-4
or immediately precede movement of the property from within the state to2-5
a point outside its borders.2-6
(b) "State" includes the District of Columbia.2-7
Sec. 2. NRS 372.255 is hereby amended to read as follows: 372.255 1.2-9
act, on and after July 1, 1979, it is presumed that tangible personal property2-10
delivered outside this state to a purchaser known by the retailer to be a2-11
resident of this state was purchased from a retailer for storage, use or other2-12
consumption in this state and stored, used or otherwise consumed in this2-13
state.2-14
2. This presumption may be controverted by:2-15
(a) A statement in writing, signed by the purchaser or his authorized2-16
representative, and retained by the vendor, that the property was purchased2-17
for use at a designated point or points outside this state.2-18
(b) Other evidence satisfactory to the department that the property was2-19
not purchased for storage, use or other consumption in this state.2-20
Sec. 3. Chapter 374 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a2-21
new section to read as follows:2-22
1. It is presumed that tangible personal property delivered outside2-23
this state to a purchaser was not purchased from a retailer for storage,2-24
use or other consumption in this state if the property:2-25
(a) Was first used in interstate or foreign commerce outside this state;2-26
and2-27
(b) Is used continuously in interstate or foreign commerce, but not2-28
exclusively in this state, for at least 12 months after the date that the2-29
property was first used pursuant to paragraph (a).2-30
2. As used in this section:2-31
(a) "Interstate or foreign commerce" means the transportation of2-32
passengers or property between:2-33
(1) A point in one state and a point in:2-34
(I) Another state;2-35
(II) A possession or territory of the United States; or2-36
(III) A foreign country; or2-37
(2) Points in the same state when such transportation consists of2-38
one or more segments of transportation that immediately follow2-39
movement of the property into the state from a point beyond its borders2-40
or immediately precede movement of the property from within the state to2-41
a point outside its borders.2-42
(b) "State" includes the District of Columbia.3-1
Sec. 4. NRS 374.260 is hereby amended to read as follows: 374.260 1.3-3
act, on and after July 1, 1967, it3-4
personal property delivered outside this state to a purchaser known by the3-5
retailer to be a resident of the county was purchased from a retailer for3-6
storage, use or other consumption in the county and stored, used or3-7
otherwise consumed in the county.3-8
2. This presumption may be controverted by:3-9
(a) A statement in writing, signed by the purchaser or his authorized3-10
representative, and retained by the vendor, that the property was purchased3-11
for use at a designated point or points outside this state.3-12
(b) Other evidence satisfactory to the department that the property was3-13
not purchased for storage, use or other consumption in this state.~