Senate Bill No. 380–Senators Townsend, Amodei, Rhoads, Washington, Mathews and Titus
March 11, 1999
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Establishes screening panel to review claims for damages resulting from constructional defects caused by acts or omissions of professional engineers or professional land surveyors. (BDR 3-1144)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: No.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in
bolded italics is new; matter between brackets
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1
Section 1. Title 3 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new1-2
chapter to consist of the provisions set forth as sections 2 to 25, inclusive,1-3
of this act.1-4
Sec. 2. As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,1-5
the words and terms defined in sections 3 to 8, inclusive, of this act have1-6
the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.1-7
Sec. 3. "Claim" means a claim to recover damages resulting from a1-8
constructional defect caused by an act or omission of a professional1-9
engineer or professional land surveyor.1-10
Sec. 4. "Constructional defect" has the meaning ascribed to it in1-11
NRS 40.615.1-12
Sec. 5. "Division" means the division of insurance of the1-13
department of business and industry.1-14
Sec. 6. "Engineering and surveying records" means written reports,1-15
notes, orders, photographs, plans or other written records received or1-16
produced by a professional engineer or professional land surveyor, or a2-1
person employed by a professional engineer or professional land2-2
surveyor, that contains information relating to the engineering or2-3
surveying project that is the subject of a claim.2-4
Sec. 7. "Professional engineer" has the meaning ascribed to it in2-5
NRS 625.060.2-6
Sec. 8. "Professional land surveyor" has the meaning ascribed to it2-7
in NRS 625.070.2-8
Sec. 9. 1. No action involving a claim may be filed until the claim2-9
has been submitted to a screening panel and a determination made by the2-10
panel as provided in this chapter. Any action involving a claim that is2-11
filed without satisfying the requirements of this chapter is subject to2-12
dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with this section.2-13
2. The written findings of the screening panel are admissible in any2-14
action concerning a claim that is subsequently filed in district court. No2-15
other evidence concerning the screening panel or its deliberations is2-16
admissible, and no member of the screening panel may be called to2-17
testify in such an action.2-18
Sec. 10. There is hereby created a tentative screening panel from2-19
which a screening panel must be selected to hear a claim.2-20
Sec. 11. 1. The board of governors of the Nevada Trial Lawyers2-21
Association may designate 40 of its members to serve on the tentative2-22
screening panel. Each person so designated shall serve for a term of 12-23
year.2-24
2. The state board of professional engineers and land surveyors may2-25
designate 40 of its members to serve on the tentative screening panel.2-26
Each person so designated shall serve for a term of 1 year.2-27
Sec. 12. 1. The commissioner of insurance shall arrange for2-28
courses of instruction in the rules of procedure and substantive law2-29
appropriate for members of the tentative screening panel.2-30
2. A person who has been designated to serve on the tentative2-31
screening panel must attend the instruction provided pursuant to2-32
subsection 1 before serving on a screening panel.2-33
Sec. 13. 1. The members of a screening panel shall elect one2-34
member to serve as chairman.2-35
2. A screening panel is a state agency. The rules adopted pursuant to2-36
section 15 of this act apply to all screening panels.2-37
Sec. 14. The provisions of chapter 241 of NRS do not apply to a2-38
meeting of a screening panel.2-39
Sec. 15. The division, through the commissioner of insurance:2-40
1. Shall maintain a list of the names of the attorneys, professional2-41
engineers and professional land surveyors designated as qualified to2-42
serve on the tentative screening panel;2-43
2. Shall select the members of screening panels;3-1
3. Shall schedule hearings for those panels;3-2
4. Shall obtain, before or after filing of a complaint such3-3
engineering and surveying records, statements of policy and procedure,3-4
and other materials as may be required by the parties or the screening3-5
panel in connection with the claim;3-6
5. Shall charge and collect a reasonable fee for copying materials3-7
produced under subpoena;3-8
6. May, for good cause shown, authorize a continuance for the3-9
proceedings involving a screening panel; and3-10
7. May adopt rules of practice and procedure to carry out its duties3-11
as set forth in this chapter.3-12
Sec. 16. Any money received by the division pursuant to the3-13
provisions of this chapter must be deposited with the state treasurer for3-14
credit to the account for the division of insurance in the state general3-15
fund. The administrative costs of the screening panels must be paid from3-16
the account.3-17
Sec. 17. 1. A claim is properly presented to a screening panel by3-18
filing a complaint with the division. A fee of $350 must accompany the3-19
complaint.3-20
2. The complaint must contain a clear and concise statement of the3-21
facts of the case, showing the persons involved and the dates and3-22
circumstances, so far as they are known, of the alleged acts or omissions3-23
that caused the constructional defect. The screening panel may dismiss3-24
the complaint if the complaint is filed without an affidavit supporting the3-25
allegations of the complaint submitted by an expert in engineering or3-26
land surveying.3-27
3. The person against whom the complaint is made must, within 903-28
days after receipt of the complaint, file an answer with the division,3-29
accompanied by a fee of $350. The division may authorize an extension3-30
of the time in which an answer must be filed only if all parties to the3-31
action stipulate to the extension.3-32
4. If an answer is not timely filed with the division, the respondent3-33
who failed to file may not participate in any conference held pursuant to3-34
section 18 of this act.3-35
5. The claimant may respond only to the allegations of the answer or3-36
any accompanying affidavit by filing a written response with the division3-37
within 30 days after he receives the answer. The screening panel shall3-38
disregard any portion of a response that does not address an allegation3-39
raised in the answer or any affidavit accompanying the answer. No fee3-40
may be charged or collected by the division for the filing of the response.3-41
The division may authorize an extension of the time in which a response3-42
may be filed only if all parties to the action stipulate to the extension.4-1
6. Unless otherwise stipulated to by all the parties to the action, the4-2
division shall not accept an answer or response that is not timely filed.4-3
7. A copy of any pleading required by this section to be filed with the4-4
division must be delivered by the party, by certified or registered mail or4-5
by personal service, to each opposing party or, if he is represented in the4-6
proceedings by counsel, to his attorney.4-7
8. The fees required by this section must not be charged or collected4-8
more than once:4-9
(a) From any party; or4-10
(b) For the filing of a complaint, regardless of the number of parties4-11
joined in the complaint.4-12
9. If a person fails to pay a fee required by this section, the4-13
commissioner of insurance may refer the nonpayment to the office of the4-14
attorney general for collection of the fee and any costs incurred.4-15
Sec. 18. 1. Within 35 days after the expiration of the time in which4-16
to answer the complaint filed pursuant to section 17 of this act, the4-17
division shall hold a conference to resolve any issues as to challenges for4-18
cause. For good cause shown, the division may continue the conference4-19
once, for a period not to exceed 7 days. A party may challenge any4-20
person on the tentative screening panel for cause on any of the grounds4-21
provided by NRS 16.050 for the challenge of jurors.4-22
2. The division shall determine whether cause exists to excuse a4-23
member of the tentative screening panel and shall notify each party of4-24
the excused members not later than the completion of the conference4-25
required by subsection 1.4-26
3. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, each party is4-27
entitled to not more than:4-28
(a) Three peremptory challenges from the list of attorneys;4-29
(b) Three peremptory challenges from the list of professional4-30
engineers, if the respondent is a professional engineer; and4-31
(c) Three peremptory challenges from the list of professional land4-32
surveyors, if the respondent is a professional land surveyor.4-33
If there are two or more claimants or respondents, they are collectively4-34
entitled to not more than six peremptory challenges from the list of4-35
members selected for the tentative screening panel. Each party asserting4-36
a peremptory challenge shall notify the division of the challenge at the4-37
conference required by subsection 1. If the same attorney represents4-38
several parties, those parties shall be deemed to be one party for4-39
determining the distribution of peremptory challenges.4-40
4. The division shall randomly select from the list of members of the4-41
tentative screening panel who have not been excused for cause or by a4-42
peremptory challenge, the names of three professional engineers or4-43
professional land surveyors, depending on whether the claim is against a5-1
professional engineer or professional land surveyor, and two attorneys to5-2
serve on the screening panel for review of the claim.5-3
5. The division shall notify the parties and the members of the5-4
tentative screening panel selected to serve on the screening panel5-5
immediately after it has made the selections. If any member so selected5-6
declines to serve, the division shall immediately and randomly select a5-7
replacement from the list. The division shall not release or disclose to any5-8
person the names of the persons selected.5-9
6. If, because of the exercise of challenges for cause or peremptory5-10
challenges or any other reason, fewer than three professional engineers5-11
or professional land surveyors or fewer than two attorneys remain5-12
available to serve on the screening panel, the division shall immediately5-13
notify the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association or the state board of5-14
professional engineers and land surveyors, as appropriate. The5-15
association or board shall immediately designate from among its5-16
members the required number of persons to serve on the screening panel.5-17
No person who is not so designated may serve on the screening panel.5-18
Sec. 19. 1. The division may, by certified or registered mail, issue5-19
subpoenas as may be required by the screening panel, to compel the5-20
attendance of an expert witness and, as may be required by the parties or5-21
the screening panel, to compel the production of books, papers,5-22
engineering or surveying records, statements of policy and procedure, or5-23
other materials.5-24
2. The division shall keep any materials so produced and make the5-25
materials available to the parties, upon request, for inspection or5-26
copying. If the materials are reasonably capable of being copied, the5-27
division shall provide a copy to the parties upon request and receipt of a5-28
fee for copying the materials.5-29
3. If an expert witness refuses to attend or testify or if a person5-30
refuses to produce the materials required by a subpoena, the division5-31
may report to the district court by petition setting forth that:5-32
(a) Notice was given of the time and place of attendance by the expert5-33
witness or for the production of the materials;5-34
(b) The expert witness or the person required to produce the materials5-35
was subpoenaed by the division pursuant to this section; and5-36
(c) The expert witness has failed or refused to attend or testify, or the5-37
person has failed or refused to produce the materials required by the5-38
subpoena or has refused to answer questions propounded to him,5-39
and asking for an order of the court compelling the expert witness to5-40
attend and testify or the other person to produce the materials.5-41
4. Upon receiving such a petition, the court shall enter an order5-42
directing the expert witness or other person to appear before the court at5-43
a time and place fixed by the court in its order, the time to be not more6-1
than 10 days after the date of the order, and show cause why the expert6-2
witness has not attended or testified or the person has not produced the6-3
materials. A certified copy of the order must be served upon the expert6-4
witness or other person.6-5
5. If it appears to the court that the subpoena was regularly issued by6-6
the division, the court shall enter an order that the expert witness or other6-7
person appear at the time and place fixed in the order and testify or6-8
produce the required materials. If the expert witness or other person fails6-9
to appear and testify or produce the required materials, the expert witness6-10
or other person is in contempt of court.6-11
Sec. 20. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, discovery6-12
must not be made or conducted before or during a hearing held pursuant6-13
to section 21 of this act.6-14
2. Before the hearing, each party may conduct a test of the property6-15
containing the constructional defect that is not invasive or destructive.6-16
The test must be conducted not later than 15 days after the complaint is6-17
filed with the division pursuant to section 17 of this act at a time that is6-18
agreeable to the parties, or as otherwise directed by the division.6-19
3. If a person other than the professional engineer or professional6-20
land surveyor against whom a claim has been made has conducted a test6-21
of the property containing the constructional defect that is invasive or6-22
destructive, the professional engineer or professional land surveyor6-23
against whom the claim has been made may conduct a test of that6-24
property that is similarly destructive or invasive. The test must be6-25
conducted not later than 15 days after the complaint is filed with the6-26
division pursuant to section 17 of this act at a time that is agreeable to6-27
the parties, or as otherwise directed by the division.6-28
Sec. 21. 1. A claim must be heard by the screening panel within 306-29
days after the panel is selected.6-30
2. The screening panel shall consider the documentary material,6-31
including the complaint, answer and response, engineering and6-32
surveying records, and any other documentary material, and the6-33
testimony of any witness the panel considers necessary, and shall6-34
determine whether there is a reasonable probability that the6-35
constructional defect was caused by an act or omission of the6-36
professional engineer or professional land surveyor.6-37
3. Copies of the original complaint and the findings of the screening6-38
panel regarding each matter considered by the panel must be forwarded6-39
to:6-40
(a) The state board of professional engineers and land surveyors; and6-41
(b) The county engineer or county surveyor of the county where the6-42
property containing the constructional defect is located.7-1
4. The commissioner of insurance shall mail to the parties a copy of7-2
the written findings of the screening panel concerning the complaint.7-3
5. The written findings must be based upon a vote of the members of7-4
the screening panel made by written ballot, must be rendered within 57-5
days after the review and must be in substantially the following form:7-6
(a) Based upon a review of the materials submitted by the parties and7-7
the testimony of the engineering or land surveying experts, if any were7-8
called, we find that there is a reasonable probability that the7-9
constructional defect was caused by an act or omission of the7-10
professional engineer or professional land surveyor;7-11
(b) Based upon a review of the materials submitted by the parties and7-12
the testimony of engineering or land surveying experts, if any were7-13
called, we find that there is not a reasonable probability that the7-14
constructional defect was caused by an act or omission of the7-15
professional engineer or professional land surveyor; or7-16
(c) Based upon a review of the materials submitted by the parties and7-17
the testimony of engineering or land surveying experts, if any were7-18
called, we are unable to determine whether there is a reasonable7-19
probability that the constructional defect was caused by an act or7-20
omission of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor.7-21
6. If three members of the screening panel are unable to determine7-22
whether there is a reasonable probability that the constructional defect7-23
was caused by an act or omission of the professional engineer or7-24
professional land surveyor, the screening panel shall be deemed unable7-25
to reach a decision on the issue and shall make a finding to that effect.7-26
Sec. 22. 1. If a screening panel finds in favor of the claimant and7-27
an action based on the claim is thereafter filed in district court, a7-28
conference for settlement must be held as provided in section 23 of this7-29
act.7-30
2. If the determination is not in favor of the claimant, the claimant7-31
may file such an action in district court. If the claimant does not obtain a7-32
judgment in his favor in district court, the defendant must be awarded7-33
reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred after the date of filing the7-34
action in district court.7-35
3. If a screening panel is unable, for any reason, to reach a decision,7-36
the claimant may file such an action in district court or proceed no7-37
further with the complaint.7-38
4. If the claimant files such an action in district court, a person must7-39
not be named as a party in the action unless the person was named as a7-40
party in the complaint that was filed with the division and considered by7-41
the screening panel.8-1
Sec. 23. 1. In an action for damages caused by a constructional8-2
defect resulting from an act or omission of a professional engineer or8-3
professional land surveyor filed in district court after a determination by8-4
a screening panel that there is a reasonable probability that the8-5
constructional defect was caused by an act or omission of the8-6
professional engineer or professional land surveyor, the plaintiff, the8-7
defendant, the representative of the insurer of the professional engineer8-8
or professional land surveyor, and their respective attorneys shall attend8-9
a conference for settlement before a district judge, other than the judge8-10
assigned to the case, to determine the amount of the damages to the8-11
plaintiff. The judge before whom the conference is held:8-12
(a) Must be selected randomly by the clerk of the court upon receiving8-13
the notice described in subsection 2, except that the judge may not be the8-14
judge assigned to the case;8-15
(b) May, for good cause shown, waive the attendance of a party; and8-16
(c) Shall decide the information the parties may submit at the8-17
conference.8-18
2. In any such action, the responsive pleading of the defendant must8-19
be accompanied by a notice to the clerk of the court that the case must be8-20
scheduled for a conference for settlement. If the defendant does not file8-21
this notice, the notice may be filed by another party. The clerk of the8-22
court shall immediately notify the judge before whom the conference will8-23
be held of the receipt of that notice.8-24
3. The judge shall notify the parties, within 7 days after receipt of the8-25
notice, of the time and place of the conference for settlement, which must8-26
not be later than 60 days after receipt of the notice. The judge shall,8-27
before the date scheduled for the conference, cause the deposition of:8-28
(a) The plaintiff;8-29
(b) The defendant; and8-30
(c) A person designated by the plaintiff to testify regarding8-32
to be taken in the manner prescribed by rule of court for taking a8-33
deposition in a civil action in a district court.8-34
4. The judge before whom the conference for settlement will be held8-35
may, for good cause shown, continue the conference for a period not to8-36
exceed 15 days. Only one such continuance may be granted.8-37
5. Within 15 days after the conference for settlement, the judge8-38
before whom the conference was held shall determine, solely from the8-39
information submitted at the conference, the reasonable value of the8-40
claim and shall notify the parties of his determination in writing.8-41
6. Within 14 days after the receipt of the determination of the judge8-42
of the reasonable value of the claim, the defendant shall offer to the8-43
plaintiff the amount determined by the judge or reject the determination.9-1
If the defendant rejects the determination and the plaintiff is awarded an9-2
amount greater than the amount of the determination, the plaintiff must9-3
be awarded reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred after the date9-4
of rejection.9-5
7. Within 14 days after the plaintiff receives an offer from the9-6
defendant for the amount determined by the judge, the plaintiff shall9-7
accept or reject the offer. If the plaintiff rejects the offer and the plaintiff9-8
is awarded an amount that is less than the amount of the offer, the9-9
defendant must be awarded reasonable costs and attorney’s fees incurred9-10
after the date of rejection.9-11
Sec. 24. 1. In an action to recover damages resulting from a9-12
constructional defect caused by an act or omission of a professional9-13
engineer that is tried before a jury, the following instructions must be9-14
given to the jury:9-15
(a) If testimony of an expert in engineering was given at the review by9-16
the screening panel:9-17
During the course of this trial certain evidence was admitted9-18
concerning the findings of a screening panel. The findings of the9-19
panel were based upon a review of engineering records and the9-20
testimony of an expert in engineering based upon his review of the9-21
engineering records. These findings are to be given the same weight9-22
as other evidence and are not to be conclusive in your determination9-23
of the case.9-24
(b) If testimony of an expert in engineering was not given at the9-25
review by the screening panel:9-26
During the course of this trial certain evidence was admitted9-27
concerning the findings of a screening panel. The findings of the9-28
panel were based solely upon a review of the engineering records.9-29
These findings are to be given the same weight as other evidence9-30
and are not to be conclusive in your determination of the case.9-31
2. In an action to recover damages resulting from a constructional9-32
defect caused by an act or omission of a professional land surveyor that9-33
is tried before a jury, the following instructions must be given to the jury:9-34
(a) If testimony of an expert in land surveying was given at the review9-35
by the screening panel:9-36
During the course of this trial certain evidence was admitted9-37
concerning the findings of a screening panel. The findings of the9-38
panel were based upon a review of surveying records and the10-1
testimony of an expert in land surveying based upon his review of10-2
the surveying records. These findings are to be given the same10-3
weight as other evidence and are not to be conclusive in your10-4
determination of the case.10-5
(b) If testimony of an expert in land surveying was not given at the10-6
review by the screening panel:10-7
During the course of this trial certain evidence was admitted10-8
concerning the findings of a screening panel. The findings of the10-9
panel were based solely upon a review of the surveying records.10-10
These findings are to be given the same weight as other evidence10-11
and are not to be conclusive in your determination of the case.10-12
Sec. 25. 1. In an action to recover damages resulting from a10-13
constructional defect caused by an act or omission of a professional10-14
engineer or professional land surveyor, the applicable statute of10-15
limitations is tolled from the date the claimant files a complaint for10-16
review by a screening panel until 30 days after the date the panel notifies10-17
the claimant, in writing, of its findings.10-18
2. The provisions of this section apply to an action to recover10-19
damages resulting from a constructional defect caused by an act or10-20
omission of a professional engineer or professional land surveyor and to10-21
an action against a person, government or political subdivision of a10-22
government that is alleged by the claimant to be liable vicariously for10-23
damages resulting from a constructional defect caused by an act or10-24
omission of a professional engineer or professional land surveyor, if the10-25
professional engineer, professional land surveyor, other person,10-26
government or political subdivision has received timely notice of the10-27
filing of a complaint for review by a screening panel pursuant to section10-28
17 of this act.10-29
Sec. 26. The provisions of this act do not apply to a cause of action to10-30
recover damages resulting from a constructional defect, as that term is10-31
defined in section 4 of this act, before January 1, 2000.10-32
Sec. 27. This act becomes effective on January 1, 2000.~