Senate Joint Resolution No. 19–Committee on Transportation
(On Behalf of Lieutenant Governor)
March 17, 1999
____________
Referred to Committee on Government Affairs
SUMMARY—Urges Congress permanently to mitigate consequences of Section 110 of Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. (BDR R-1394)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State or on Industrial Insurance: No.
~
EXPLANATION – Matter in
bolded italics is new; matter between brackets
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION—Urging Congress permanently to mitigate the
consequences of Section 110 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996.
1-1
Whereas, The economy of the State of Nevada is dependent upon1-2
tourism; and1-3
Whereas, Canada and Mexico rank No. 1 and No. 7, respectively,1-4
among Nevada’s sources of international tourism, sending more than 1.51-5
million Canadian visitors and more than 104,000 Mexican visitors to this1-6
state per year; and1-7
Whereas, Visitors from Canada and Mexico comprise a major1-8
economic contribution to the State of Nevada; and1-9
Whereas, The United States has entered into international trade1-10
agreements with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico, to foster, encourage1-11
and stimulate the exchange of goods and products for mutual economic1-12
gain; and1-13
Whereas, The United States does not currently require departing1-14
tourists returning to Canada and Mexico to be stopped and identified at1-15
border crossings; and1-16
Whereas, Section 110 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and1-17
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 requires that a new entry-exit control1-18
system be implemented to track all foreign visitors entering and leaving the1-19
United States but does not provide any law enforcement benefits; and2-1
Whereas, The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant2-2
Responsibility Act of 1996 would impose new border inspection2-3
requirements for the gathering of data at entry and departure points for2-4
vehicular traffic from Canada and Mexico where none currently exist; and2-5
Whereas, The new border entry-exit system does not provide for any2-6
enhancement of provisions for apprehending or removing illegal2-7
immigrants, drug traffickers, terrorists or other criminals and would not2-8
curtail illegal immigration at the borders; and2-9
Whereas, No inspection stations or other facilities for departing2-10
foreign traverlers have been constructed; and2-11
Whereas, This system would be implemented at enormous expense to2-12
the taxpayers of the United States with no tangible benefits; and2-13
Whereas, Congress has held hearings at various sites along the2-14
Canadian border to consider exempting that country from the provisions of2-15
the Act, but no such hearings have been held or are scheduled in the2-16
Mexican border states; and2-17
Whereas, Mexican and Canadian tourists who enter the United States2-18
for business and recreational travel are not immigrants; and2-19
Whereas, These nonimmigrant Mexican and Canadian business and2-20
leisure travelers who will already be required to present travel documents2-21
to enter the United States, would be subjected to inspections and queries2-22
upon departure that would cause travel delays and inconveniences to those2-23
tourists; and2-24
Whereas, Such delays and inconveniences would discourage tourism in2-25
the United States by Mexican and Canadian citizens, delay commerce and2-26
create an economic downturn; and2-27
Whereas, The borders with Canada and Mexico should be kept2-28
reasonably free of governmental over-involvement in order to encourage2-29
tourism, trade and legitimate economic activity that benefit all three2-30
countries; and2-31
Whereas, The National Governors’ Association at its meeting in2-32
Washington in February 1998 determined that the entry-exit control system2-33
may have "unintended negative consequences on international trade,2-34
tourism and the economy"; and2-35
Whereas, The National Governors’ Association urged suspension of2-36
implementing the entry-exit control system until Congress and the President2-37
can ensure that any such system will not disrupt tourism, trade or other2-38
legitimate traffic entering the United States; and2-39
Whereas, Congress passed legislation in October 1998 delaying2-40
imposition of the implementation of the provisions of Section 110 until2-41
March 31, 2001, but allowing the exit system to take effect at the airports2-42
of international entry in the United States; now, therefore, be it3-1
Resolved by the Senate and Assembly of the State of Nevada,3-2
Jointly, That Congress is hereby urged permanently to mitigate the3-3
consequences of the provisions of Section 110 of the Illegal Immigration3-4
Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996; and be it further3-5
Resolved, That Congress is encouraged to keep the borders between3-6
the United States and Canada and Mexico reasonably free of governmental3-7
over-involvement and to impose no new restrictions until infrastructure is3-8
available that can collect data and detect illegal and unwanted immigration3-9
without disrupting legitimate tourist travel; and be it further3-10
Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate prepare and transmit a copy3-11
of this resolution to the Vice President of the United States as the presiding3-12
officer of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and each3-13
member of the Nevada Congressional Delegation; and be it further3-14
Resolved, That this resolution becomes effective upon passage and3-15
approval.~