Senate Joint Resolution No. 4–Senators James, Porter, Titus, Rawson,
Carlton, Amodei, Care, Coffin, Mathews, McGinness, O’Connell,
O’Donnell, Raggio, Rhoads, Schneider, Townsend, Washington
and Wiener
Joint Sponsors: Assemblymen Perkins, Buckley, Cegavske, Gibbons,
Williams, Anderson, Angle, Arberry, Bache, Beers, Berman,
Brower, Carpenter, Chowning, Claborn, Collins, de Braga, Dini,
Evans, Freeman, Giunchigliani, Goldwater, Gustavson, Hettrick,
Humke, Koivisto, Lee, Leslie, Manendo, Marvel, McClain,
Mortenson, Neighbors, Nolan, Ohrenschall, Parks, Parnell, Price,
Segerblom, Thomas, Tiffany, and Von Tobel
FILE NUMBER........
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION—Urging the Congress of the United States not to enact the
Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999.
Whereas, Few environmental challenges have proven more daunting
than the problems posed by high-level nuclear waste; and
Whereas, The proposed Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999 is a
disastrous response to these problems and if enacted would attack state
authority, create massive taxpayer liabilities and unwisely require an
"interim" storage facility for high-level nuclear waste which would directly
threaten the environment; and
Whereas, By requiring construction of an "interim" storage facility at
the Nevada Test Site, the proposed Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999
would require the unprecedented shipment of high-level nuclear waste
through 43 states endangering the lives of fifty million American citizens
who live within one-half mile of the proposed transportation routes; and
Whereas, Although there is the expectation that high-level nuclear
waste at reactors will eventually have to be moved, the provisions of the
Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999 exacerbate the risk of this dangerous
activity; and
Whereas, Despite the serious flaws with the proposed Yucca Mountain
site, studies are being conducted to determine whether the site is capable of
hosting a permanent repository for high-level nuclear waste, but if enacted,
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999 would prejudice those studies by
explicitly revoking federal regulations that establish guidelines for
determining the suitability of the site; and
Whereas, Upon the revocation of such regulations, requirements for
establishing the characteristics of the site, such as the time it takes for water
to travel and climactic stability, would be eliminated, thereby undermining
the integrity of any determination regarding the suitability of the site for the
storage of high-level nuclear waste; and
Whereas, A major cause for concern in designating the Nevada Test
Site as the "interim" storage facility is the high seismic activity that has
been taking place in the area, including seven earthquakes just last month at
3.0 or greater with three jolts recorded at a magnitude of between 4.3 and
4.7 that struck at the eastern edge of the site; and
Whereas, Geologists have expressed concern over this seismic activity
stating that these recent earthquakes are part of a swarm of tremblors that
have occurred along the Rock Valley Fault zone, including a 5.8 magnitude
quake on June 29, 1992, at Little Skull Mountain, which knocked out
windows, cracked walls and brought down ceiling panels at a fields
operations center approximately 12 miles from the site of the proposed
repository; and
Whereas, Federal law directs the Environmental Protection Agency to
enact regulations to protect the environment from repository radiation
releases, but the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999 prohibits all efforts of
the Environmental Protection Agency to carry out this responsibility; and
Whereas, The reality is that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999
would create a single performance standard that would allow annual
radiation exposures of up to 100 millirems to an average member of the
surrounding population, a level four times the amount allowed by
regulation for storage facilities; and
Whereas, The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1999 contains broad
preemptions for environmental legislation including a provision stating that
any state or local law that is "inconsistent" with the requirements of the
proposed Act is preempted; and
Whereas, This proposed Act does not allow the Environmental Impact
Statement to question the size, need or timing of any "interim" storage
facility nor does it allow any questions relating to alternative locations or
design criteria; and
Whereas, The proposed "interim" storage facility site will have a
capacity of 40,000 MTUs which is sufficient space to store all of today’s
commercial nuclear waste and the license is to be a 100-year renewable
license which suggests that this proposed "interim" storage facility is
expected to become permanent; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and Assembly of the State of Nevada,
Jointly, That the members of the 70th session of the Nevada Legislature
do hereby urge the Congress of the United States not to enact the Nuclear
Waste Policy Act of 1999, H.R. 45; and be it further
Resolved, That the Nevada Legislature is opposed to any further
consideration of the use of the Nevada Test Site as a national site for the
disposal of high-level nuclear waste; and be it further
Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate prepare and transmit a copy
of this resolution to the Vice President of the United States as the presiding
officer of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and each
member of the Nevada Congressional Delegation; and be it further
Resolved, That this resolution becomes effective upon passage and
approval.
~