(REPRINTED WITH ADOPTED AMENDMENTS)
FIRST REPRINTA.B. 327
Assembly Bill No. 327–Assemblymen Giunchigliani, Leslie, Anderson, Arberry, Bache, Oceguera and Williams
March 13, 2001
____________
Joint Sponsor: Senator Neal
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Revises order in which arguments must be presented during penalty hearing in cases where death penalty is sought. (BDR 14‑1082)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
AN ACT relating to capital punishment; revising the order in which the arguments must be presented during the penalty hearing in cases where the death penalty is sought; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1 Section 1. NRS 175.141 is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-2 175.141 The jury having been impaneled and sworn, the trial [shall]
1-3 must proceed in the following order:
1-4 1. If the indictment or information be for a felony, the clerk must read
1-5 it and state the plea of the defendant to the jury. In all other cases this
1-6 formality may be dispensed with.
1-7 2. The district attorney, or other counsel for the state, must open the
1-8 cause. The defendant or his counsel may then either make his opening
1-9 statement or reserve it to be made immediately [prior to] before the
1-10 presentation of evidence in his behalf.
1-11 3. The state must then offer its evidence in support of the charge, and
1-12 the defendant may then offer evidence in his defense.
1-13 4. The parties may then respectively offer rebutting testimony only,
1-14 unless the court, for good reasons, in furtherance of justice, permit them to
1-15 offer evidence upon their original cause.
1-16 5. [When] Except as otherwise provided in NRS 175.554, when the
1-17 evidence is concluded, unless the case is submitted to the jury on either
2-1 side, or on both sides, without argument, the district attorney, or other
2-2 counsel for the state, must open and must conclude the argument.
2-3 Sec. 2. NRS 175.554 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2-4 175.554 In cases in which the death penalty is sought:
2-5 1. The penalty hearing must be conducted as follows:
2-6 (a) The district attorney, or other counsel for the state, must open the
2-7 argument;
2-8 (b) The defendant or his counsel may then respond, and the state may
2-9 then argue in rebuttal; and
2-10 (c) The defendant must conclude the argument in surrebuttal.
2-11 2. If the penalty hearing is conducted before a jury, the court shall
2-12 instruct the jury at the end of the hearing, and shall include in its
2-13 instructions the aggravating circumstances alleged by the prosecution upon
2-14 which evidence has been presented during the trial or at the hearing. The
2-15 court shall also instruct the jury as to the mitigating circumstances alleged
2-16 by the defense upon which evidence has been presented during the trial or
2-17 at the hearing.
2-18 [2.] 3. The jury or the panel of judges shall determine:
2-19 (a) Whether an aggravating circumstance or circumstances are found to
2-20 exist;
2-21 (b) Whether a mitigating circumstance or circumstances are found to
2-22 exist; and
2-23 (c) Based upon these findings, whether the defendant should be
2-24 sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole, life
2-25 imprisonment without the possibility of parole or death.
2-26 [3.] 4. The jury or the panel of judges may impose a sentence of death
2-27 only if it finds at least one aggravating circumstance and further finds that
2-28 there are no mitigating circumstances sufficient to outweigh the
2-29 aggravating circumstance or circumstances found.
2-30 [4.] 5. If a jury or a panel of judges imposes a sentence of death, the
2-31 court shall enter its finding in the record, or the jury shall render a written
2-32 verdict signed by the foreman. The finding or verdict must designate the
2-33 aggravating circumstance or circumstances which were found beyond a
2-34 reasonable doubt, and must state that there are no mitigating circumstances
2-35 sufficient to outweigh the aggravating circumstance or circumstances
2-36 found.
2-37 Sec. 3. The amendatory provisions of this act do not apply to offenses
2-38 committed before October 1, 2001.
2-39 H