(REPRINTED WITH ADOPTED AMENDMENTS)
FIRST REPRINT A.B. 37
Assembly Bill No. 37–Committee on Judiciary
Prefiled January 25, 2001
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing maximum monthly amount that certain parents may be required to pay for support of their children. (BDR 11‑1051)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State: No.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1 Section 1. NRS 125B.070 is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-2 125B.070 1. As used in this section and NRS 125B.080, unless the
1-3 context otherwise requires:
1-4 (a) “Gross annual income” means the total amount of income earned
1-5 each year from any source of a wage-earning employee or the gross
1-6 income from any source of a self-employed person, after deduction of all
1-7 legitimate business expenses, but without deduction for personal income
1-8 taxes, contributions for retirement benefits, contributions to a pension or
1-9 for any other personal expenses.
1-10 (b) “Gross monthly income” means the total amount of income earned
1-11 each month from any source of a wage-earning employee or the gross
1-12 income from any source of a self-employed person, after deduction of all
1-13 legitimate business expenses, but without deduction for personal income
1-14 taxes, contributions for retirement benefits, contributions to a pension or
1-15 for any other personal expenses.
1-16 [(b)] (c) “Obligation for support” means the amount determined
1-17 according to the following schedule:
1-18 (1) For one child, 18 percent;
1-19 (2) For two children, 25 percent;
2-1 (3) For three children, 29 percent;
2-2 (4) For four children, 31 percent; and
2-3 (5) For each additional child, an additional 2 percent,
2-4 of a parent’s gross monthly income, but not more than [$500] the
2-5 maximum amount set forth for the parent in subsection 2 per month per
2-6 child for an obligation for support determined pursuant to subparagraphs
2-7 (1) to (4), inclusive, unless the court sets forth findings of fact as to the
2-8 basis for a different amount pursuant to subsection 6 of NRS 125B.080.
2-9 2. For the purposes of paragraph (c) of subsection 1, the maximum
2-10 amount per month per child for an obligation for support, as adjusted
2-11 pursuant to subsection 3, is:
2-12 MAXIMUM AMOUNT
2-13 The Maximum Amount the
2-14 Parent May Be Required
2-15 INCOME RANGE to Pay Pursuant to
2-16 If the Parent’s GrossBut Not Paragraph (c) of
2-17 Annual Income is Over Over Subsection 1 Is
2-18 $0 - $50,000 $500
2-19 50,000 - 75,000 550
2-20 75,000 - 100,000 600
2-21 100,000 - 125,000 650
2-22 125,000 - 150,000 700
2-23 150,000 - 175,000 750
2-24 If a parent’s gross annual income is more than $175,000, the maximum
2-25 amount the parent may be required to pay pursuant to paragraph (c) of
2-26 subsection 1 is $800.
2-27 3. The amounts set forth in subsection 2 for each income range and
2-28 the corresponding amount of the obligation for support must be adjusted
2-29 on January 1 for each calendar year in an amount corresponding to the
2-30 percentage of increase or decrease in the Consumer Price Index (All
2-31 Items) published by the United States Department of Labor for the
2-32 preceding calendar year. On or before December 15 of each year, the
2-33 office of court administrator shall determine the amount of the increase
2-34 or decrease required by this subsection, establish the adjusted amounts in
2-35 effect beginning on January 1 of the succeeding calendar year and notify
2-36 each district court of the adjusted amounts.
2-37 4. A court may provide in its order that a parent is required to pay
2-38 the maximum amount for an obligation for support as determined
2-39 pursuant to subsections 1 and 2 and increased each year pursuant to
2-40 subsection 3. If the court issues such an order, it shall provide in the
2-41 order the current amount that the parent is required to pay through the
2-42 end of the calendar year and require the parent to contact the court
2-43 before January 1 of each subsequent calendar year to determine the
2-44 amount of his obligation for support for each subsequent year.
2-45 5. On or before January 18, 1993, and on or before the third Monday
2-46 in January every 4 years thereafter, the State Bar of Nevada shall review
3-1 the formulas set forth in this section to determine whether any
3-2 modifications are advisable and report to the legislature their findings and
3-3 any proposed amendments.
3-4 Sec. 2. NRS 125B.080 is hereby amended to read as follows:
3-5 125B.080 Except as otherwise provided in NRS 425.450:
3-6 1. A court of this state shall apply the appropriate formula set forth in
3-7 [paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of] NRS 125B.070 to:
3-8 (a) Determine the required support in any case involving the support of
3-9 children.
3-10 (b) Any request filed after July 1, 1987, to change the amount of the
3-11 required support of children.
3-12 2. If the parties agree as to the amount of support required, the parties
3-13 shall certify that the amount of support is consistent with the appropriate
3-14 formula set forth in [paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of] NRS 125B.070. If
3-15 the amount of support deviates from the formula, the parties must stipulate
3-16 sufficient facts in accordance with subsection 9 which justify the deviation
3-17 to the court, and the court shall make a written finding thereon. Any
3-18 inaccuracy or falsification of financial information which results in an
3-19 inappropriate award of support is grounds for a motion to modify or adjust
3-20 the award.
3-21 3. If the parties disagree as to the amount of the gross annual income
3-22 or gross monthly income of either party, the court shall determine the
3-23 amount and may direct either party to furnish financial information or other
3-24 records, including income tax returns for the preceding 3 years. Once a
3-25 court has established an obligation for support by reference to a formula set
3-26 forth in [paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of] NRS 125B.070, any subsequent
3-27 modification or adjustment of that support, except for any modification or
3-28 adjustment made pursuant to subsections 3 and 4 of NRS 125B.070 or
3-29 NRS 425.450 or as a result of a review conducted pursuant to subsection 1
3-30 of NRS 125B.145, must be based upon changed circumstances.
3-31 4. Notwithstanding the formulas set forth in [paragraph (b) of
3-32 subsection 1 of] NRS 125B.070, the minimum amount of support that may
3-33 be awarded by a court in any case is $100 per month per child, unless the
3-34 court makes a written finding that the obligor is unable to pay the
3-35 minimum amount. Willful underemployment or unemployment is not a
3-36 sufficient cause to deviate from the awarding of at least the minimum
3-37 amount.
3-38 5. It is presumed that the basic needs of a child are met by the formulas
3-39 set forth in [paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of] NRS 125B.070. This
3-40 presumption may be rebutted by evidence proving that the needs of a
3-41 particular child are not met by the applicable formula.
3-42 6. If the amount of the awarded support for a child is greater or less
3-43 than the amount which would be established under the applicable formula,
3-44 the court shall:
3-45 (a) Set forth findings of fact as to the basis for the deviation from the
3-46 formula; and
3-47 (b) Provide in the findings of fact the amount of support that would
3-48 have been established under the applicable formula.
4-1 7. Expenses for health care which are not reimbursed, including
4-2 expenses for medical, surgical, dental, orthodontic and optical expenses,
4-3 must be borne equally by both parents in the absence of extraordinary
4-4 circumstances.
4-5 8. If a parent who has an obligation for support is willfully
4-6 underemployed or unemployed to avoid an obligation for support of a
4-7 child, that obligation must be based upon the parent’s true potential earning
4-8 capacity.
4-9 9. The court shall consider the following factors when adjusting the
4-10 amount of support of a child upon specific findings of fact:
4-11 (a) The cost of health insurance;
4-12 (b) The cost of child care;
4-13 (c) Any special educational needs of the child;
4-14 (d) The age of the child;
4-15 (e) The responsibility of the parents for the support of others;
4-16 (f) The value of services contributed by either parent;
4-17 (g) Any public assistance paid to support the child;
4-18 (h) Any expenses reasonably related to the mother’s pregnancy and
4-19 confinement;
4-20 (i) The cost of transportation of the child to and from visitation if the
4-21 custodial parent moved with the child from the jurisdiction of the court
4-22 which ordered the support and the noncustodial parent remained;
4-23 (j) The amount of time the child spends with each parent;
4-24 (k) Any other necessary expenses for the benefit of the child; and
4-25 (l) The relative income of both parents.
4-26 H