(REPRINTED WITH ADOPTED AMENDMENTS)
THIRD REPRINT S.B. 25
Senate Bill No. 25–Senator O’Connell (By Request)
Prefiled January 19, 2001
____________
Joint Sponsor: Assemblywoman Berman
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing granting of rights to visitation with child to persons other than parents of child. (BDR 11‑45)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1 Section 1. NRS 125C.050 is hereby amended to read as follows:
1-2 125C.050 1. Except as otherwise provided in [subsection 3,] this
1-3 section, if a parent of an unmarried minor child:
1-4 (a) Is deceased;
1-5 (b) Is divorced or separated from the parent who has custody of the
1-6 child;
1-7 (c) Has never been legally married to the other parent of the child, but
1-8 cohabitated with the other parent and is deceased or is separated from the
1-9 other parent; or
1-10 (d) Has relinquished his parental rights or his parental rights have been
1-11 terminated,
1-12 the district court in the county in which the child resides may grant to the
1-13 great-grandparents and grandparents of the child and to other children of
1-14 either parent of the child a reasonable right to visit the child during his
1-15 minority . [, if the court finds that the visits would be in the best interests of
1-16 the child.]
2-1 2. If the child has resided with a person with whom he has established
2-2 a meaningful relationship, the district court in the county in which the
2-3 child resides also may grant to that person a reasonable right to visit the
2-4 child during his minority, regardless of whether the person is related to the
2-5 child . [, if the court finds that the visits would be in the best interests of the
2-6 child.]
2-7 3. A party may seek a reasonable right to visit the child during his
2-8 minority pursuant to subsection 1 or 2 only if a parent of the child has
2-9 denied or unreasonably restricted visits with the child.
2-10 4. If a parent of the child has denied or unreasonably restricted visits
2-11 with the child, there is a rebuttable presumption that the granting of a
2-12 right to visitation to a party seeking visitation is not in the best interests
2-13 of the child. To rebut this presumption, the party seeking visitation must
2-14 prove by clear and convincing evidence that it is in the best interests of
2-15 the child to grant visitation.
2-16 5. The court may grant a party seeking visitation pursuant to
2-17 subsection 1 or 2 a reasonable right to visit the child during his minority
2-18 only if the court finds that the party seeking visitation has rebutted the
2-19 presumption established in subsection 4.
2-20 6. In determining whether [to grant a right to visitation to a petitioner
2-21 pursuant to subsection 1 or 2,] the party seeking visitation has rebutted the
2-22 presumption established in subsection 4, the court shall consider:
2-23 (a) The love, affection and other emotional ties existing between the
2-24 party seeking visitation and the child.
2-25 (b) The capacity and disposition of the party seeking visitation to:
2-26 (1) Give the child love, affection and guidance and serve as a role
2-27 model to the child;
2-28 (2) Cooperate in providing the child with food, clothing and other
2-29 material needs during visitation; and
2-30 (3) Cooperate in providing the child with health care or alternative
2-31 care recognized and permitted under the laws of this state in lieu of health
2-32 care.
2-33 (c) The prior relationship between the child and the party seeking
2-34 visitation, including, without limitation, whether the child resided with the
2-35 party seeking visitation and whether the child was included in holidays and
2-36 family gatherings with the party seeking visitation.
2-37 (d) The moral fitness of the party seeking visitation.
2-38 (e) The mental and physical health of the party seeking visitation.
2-39 (f) The reasonable preference of the child, if the child has a preference,
2-40 and if the child is determined to be of sufficient maturity to express a
2-41 preference.
2-42 (g) The willingness and ability of the party seeking visitation to
2-43 facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the
2-44 child and the parent or parents of the child as well as with other relatives of
2-45 the child.
2-46 (h) The medical and other needs of the child related to health as affected
2-47 by the visitation.
3-1 (i) The support provided by the party seeking visitation, including,
3-2 without limitation, whether the party has contributed to the financial
3-3 support of the child.
3-4 (j) Any other factor [considered relevant by the court to a particular
3-5 dispute.
3-6 4.] arising solely from the facts and circumstances of the particular
3-7 dispute that specifically pertains to the need for granting a right to
3-8 visitation pursuant to subsection 1 or 2 against the wishes of a parent of
3-9 the child.
3-10 7. If the parental rights of either or both natural parents of a child are
3-11 relinquished or terminated, and the child is placed in the custody of a
3-12 public agency or a private agency licensed to place children in homes, the
3-13 district court in the county in which the child resides may grant to the
3-14 great-grandparents and grandparents of the child and to other children of
3-15 either parent of the child a reasonable right to visit the child during his
3-16 minority if a petition therefor is filed with the court before the date on
3-17 which the parental rights are relinquished or terminated. In determining
3-18 whether to grant this right to a [petitioner,] party seeking visitation, the
3-19 court must find , by a preponderance of the evidence, that the visits would
3-20 be in the best interests of the child in light of the considerations set forth in
3-21 paragraphs (a) to (i), inclusive, of subsection [3.] 6.
3-22 [5.]8. Rights to visit a child may be granted:
3-23 (a) In a divorce decree;
3-24 (b) In an order of separate maintenance; or
3-25 (c) Upon a petition filed by an eligible person:
3-26 (1) After a divorce or separation or after the death of a parent, or
3-27 upon the relinquishment or termination of a parental right;
3-28 (2) If the parents of the child were not legally married and were
3-29 cohabitating, after the death of a parent or after the separation of the
3-30 parents of the child; [or]
3-31 (3) If the petition is based on the provisions of subsection 2, after the
3-32 eligible person ceases to reside with the child.
3-33 [6.] 9. If a court terminates the parental rights of a parent who is
3-34 divorced or separated, any rights previously granted pursuant to subsection
3-35 1 also must be terminated, unless the court finds , by a preponderance of
3-36 the evidence, that visits by those persons would be in the best interests of
3-37 the child.
3-38 [7.] 10. For the purposes of this section, “separation” means:
3-39 (a) A legal separation or any other separation of a married couple if the
3-40 couple has lived separate and apart for 30 days or more and has no present
3-41 intention of resuming a marital relationship; or
3-42 (b) If a couple was not legally married but cohabitating, a separation of
3-43 the couple if the couple has lived separate and apart for 30 days or more
3-44 and has no present intention of resuming cohabitation or entering into a
3-45 marital relationship.
3-46 Sec. 2. The amendatory provisions of this act apply to a petition for
3-47 visitation that is filed on or after the effective date of this act.
4-1 Sec. 3. This act becomes effective upon passage and approval.
4-2 H