(REPRINTED WITH ADOPTED AMENDMENTS)
FIRST REPRINT S.B. 265
Senate Bill No. 265–Committee on Government Affairs
March 1, 2001
____________
Referred to Committee on Government Affairs
SUMMARY—Requires city or county to pay just compensation or authorize alternative location for certain structures under certain circumstances. (BDR 22‑156)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: Yes.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
AN ACT relating to zoning; requiring a city or county to pay just compensation or authorize an alternative location for certain structures under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1 Section 1. Chapter 278 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a
1-2 new section to read as follows:
1-3 1. If a city or county, through the adoption, operation or
1-4 enforcement of any ordinance or code, requires the removal of a
1-5 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure, the city or county shall:
1-6 (a) Pay just compensation for the loss of the nonconforming outdoor
1-7 advertising structure to the owner of the nonconforming outdoor
1-8 advertising structure and to the owner of the real property upon which
1-9 the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure is located; or
1-10 (b) Authorize the owner of the nonconforming outdoor advertising
1-11 structure to relocate that structure to a site which is determined to be a
1-12 comparable site by the city or county and the owner of the
1-13 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure.
1-14 2. If a city or county prohibits the owner of a nonconforming
1-15 outdoor advertising structure from routinely maintaining the
1-16 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure, the city or county shall
1-17 provide just compensation or authorize a comparable alternative location
1-18 for the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure in the same manner
1-19 as if the city or county had required the removal of the nonconforming
1-20 outdoor advertising structure pursuant to subsection 1.
1-21 3. A city or county shall not allow or require the removal of a
1-22 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure to occur pursuant to an
2-1 amortization schedule, regardless of the length of the period set forth in
2-2 the amortization schedule.
2-3 4. The requirements of subsection 1 do not apply if a nonconforming
2-4 outdoor advertising structure is required to be removed as a result of the
2-5 owner of the real property upon which the nonconforming outdoor
2-6 advertising structure is located terminating the lease that governs the
2-7 placement of the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure on that
2-8 property pursuant to the terms of that lease.
2-9 5. A city or county shall not require the removal of a nonconforming
2-10 outdoor advertising structure as a condition to the development of the
2-11 property upon which the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure is
2-12 located without first holding a public hearing at which the owner of the
2-13 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure has an opportunity to be
2-14 heard.
2-15 6. If the owner of a nonconforming outdoor advertising structure or
2-16 the owner of the real property upon which the nonconforming outdoor
2-17 advertising structure is located disagrees with the amount of just
2-18 compensation the city or county determines should be paid to him, the
2-19 owner may appeal the determination to a court of competent jurisdiction.
2-20 In determining the amount of just compensation that should be paid to
2-21 an owner pursuant to subsection 1, the court shall consider:
2-22 (a) The uniqueness of the location of the property upon which the
2-23 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure is erected;
2-24 (b) Whether the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure can be
2-25 relocated to a comparable site;
2-26 (c) The amount of income generated by the nonconforming outdoor
2-27 advertising structure; and
2-28 (d) The length of time remaining on any applicable term of a lease
2-29 governing the nonconforming outdoor advertising structure.
2-30 7. As used in this section:
2-31 (a) “Amortization schedule” means an extended period over which a
2-32 person is allowed or required to remove a nonconforming outdoor
2-33 advertising structure.
2-34 (b) “Just compensation” means the most probable price that a
2-35 nonconforming outdoor advertising structure would bring in a
2-36 competitive and open market under the conditions of a fair sale, without
2-37 the price being affected by undue stimulus.
2-38 (c) “Nonconforming outdoor advertising structure” means an outdoor
2-39 advertising structure which is constructed or erected in conformance
2-40 with all applicable local ordinances and codes in effect on the date a
2-41 building permit is issued for the outdoor advertising structure and which
2-42 does not conform subsequently because of a change to the local
2-43 ordinances or codes. The term does not include an outdoor advertising
2-44 structure that is authorized by a special use permit, conditional use
2-45 permit, variance or waiver if, when the special use permit, conditional
2-46 use permit, variance or waiver was first approved, the special use permit,
2-47 conditional use permit, variance or waiver was limited by a specific date
2-48 after which it would be reviewed by the governing body of the city or
2-49 county.
3-1 (d) “Outdoor advertising structure” means any sign, display, billboard
3-2 or other device that is designed, intended or used to advertise or inform
3-3 readers about services rendered or goods produced or sold on property
3-4 other than the property upon which the sign, display, billboard or other
3-5 device is erected.
3-6 Sec. 2. This act becomes effective upon passage and approval.
3-7 H