Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 9–Senator Rawson
February 15, 2001
____________
Referred to Committee on Legislative Affairs and Operations
SUMMARY—Directs Legislative Commission to conduct interim study of feasibility of constructing highway between Mesquite and Caliente. (BDR R‑739)
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
Senate Concurrent RESOLUTION—Directing the Legislative Commission to conduct an interim study of the feasibility of constructing a highway between Mesquite and Caliente.
1-1 Whereas, The construction of a highway between Mesquite and
1-2 Caliente would mitigate the effects of the isolation and inaccessibility of
1-3 Caliente and the surrounding area; and
1-4 Whereas, The construction of a highway between Mesquite and
1-5 Caliente would provide a direct route from Mesquite to U.S. Highway No.
1-6 93 and would complete the corridor from Los Angeles to Salt Lake City;
1-7 and
1-8 Whereas, The construction of such a highway would greatly improve
1-9 access to the Great Basin National Park; and
1-10 Whereas, The construction of such a highway would help to promote
1-11 tourism and provide economic benefits to this state; now, therefore, be it
1-12 Resolved by the Senate of the State of Nevada, the Assembly
1-13 Concurring, That the Legislative Commission is hereby directed to
1-14 conduct an interim study of the feasibility of constructing a highway
1-15 between Mesquite and Caliente; and be it further
1-16 Resolved, That the Legislative Commission shall appoint a
1-17 subcommittee, consisting of three members of the Senate and three
1-18 members of the Assembly to conduct the study; and be it further
1-19 Resolved, That the Director of the Department of Transportation shall
1-20 assist the subcommittee in conducting the study; and be it further
1-21 Resolved, That the study must include, without limitation:
1-22 1. An analysis of the types of highways that may be constructed and
1-23 the approximate cost to construct each type of highway;
1-24 2. An estimate of the number of vehicles that would use the highway
1-25 each year;
1-26 3. An analysis of the benefits of constructing the highway, including a
1-27 monetary estimate of the economic benefits to this state; and
2-1 4. An analysis of whether such a highway should be constructed; and
2-2 be it further
2-3 Resolved, That any recommended legislation proposed by the
2-4 subcommittee must be approved by a majority of the members of the
2-5 Senate and a majority of the members of the Assembly appointed to the
2-6 subcommittee; and be it further
2-7 Resolved, That the Legislative Commission shall submit a report of
2-8 the results of the study and any recommended legislation to the 72nd
2-9 session of the Nevada Legislature.
2-10 H