A.B. 27
Assembly Bill No. 27–Committee on Judiciary
Prefiled January 29, 2003
____________
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
SUMMARY—Revises method for adjusting presumptive maximum amounts of child support owed by noncustodial parents. (BDR 11‑244)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State: No.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
AN ACT relating to child support; revising the method for adjusting the presumptive maximum amounts of child support owed by noncustodial parents; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1-1 Section 1. NRS 125B.070 is hereby amended to read as
1-2 follows:
1-3 125B.070 1. As used in this section and NRS 125B.080,
1-4 unless the context otherwise requires:
1-5 (a) “Gross monthly income” means the total amount of income
1-6 received each month from any source of a person who is not self-
1-7 employed or the gross income from any source of a self-employed
1-8 person, after deduction of all legitimate business expenses, but
1-9 without deduction for personal income taxes, contributions for
1-10 retirement benefits, contributions to a pension or for any other
1-11 personal expenses.
1-12 (b) “Obligation for support” means the sum certain dollar
1-13 amount determined according to the following schedule:
1-14 (1) For one child, 18 percent;
1-15 (2) For two children, 25 percent;
1-16 (3) For three children, 29 percent;
1-17 (4) For four children, 31 percent; and
2-1 (5) For each additional child, an additional 2 percent,
2-2 of a parent’s gross monthly income, but not more than the
2-3 presumptive maximum amount per month per child set forth for the
2-4 parent in subsection 2 for an obligation for support determined
2-5 pursuant to subparagraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, unless the court sets
2-6 forth findings of fact as to the basis for a different amount pursuant
2-7 to subsection 6 of NRS 125B.080.
2-8 2. For the purposes of paragraph (b) of subsection 1, the
2-9 presumptive maximum amount per month per child for an obligation
2-10 for support, as adjusted pursuant to subsection 3, is:
2-11 PRESUMPTIVE MAXIMUM AMOUNT
2-12 The Presumptive Maximum Amount the
2-13 INCOME RANGE Parent May Be Required to Pay
2-14 If the Parent’s GrossBut per Month per Child Pursuant to
2-15 Monthly Income is at Least Less Than Paragraph (b) of Subsection 1 Is
2-16 $0 - $4,168 $500
2-17 4,168 - 6,251 550
2-18 6,251 - 8,334 600
2-19 8,334 - 10,418 650
2-20 10,418 - 12,501 700
2-21 12,501 - 14,583 750
2-22 If a parent’s gross monthly income is equal to or greater than
2-23 $14,583, the presumptive maximum amount the parent may be
2-24 required to pay pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 1 is $800.
2-25 3. Thepresumptive maximum amounts set forth in subsection
2-26 2 for [each income range and the corresponding amount of] the
2-27 obligation for support must be adjusted on July 1 of each year for
2-28 the fiscal year beginning that day and ending June 30 in a rounded
2-29 dollar amount corresponding to the percentage of increase or
2-30 decrease in the Consumer Price Index (All Items) published by the
2-31 United States Department of Labor for the preceding calendar year.
2-32 On April 1 of each year, the Office of Court Administrator shall
2-33 determine the amount of the increase or decrease required by this
2-34 subsection, establish the adjusted amounts to take effect on July 1 of
2-35 that year and notify each district court of the adjusted amounts.
2-36 4. As used in this section, “Office of Court Administrator”
2-37 means the Office of Court Administrator created pursuant to
2-38 NRS 1.320.
2-39 Sec. 2. This act becomes effective upon passage and approval.
2-40 H