Adoption of this amendment will MAINTAIN an unfunded mandate requested by the affected local government to AB23 R1 (§§ 1, 2).
ASSEMBLY ACTION Initial and Date |SENATE ACTION Initial and Date
Adopted Lost | Adopted Lost
Concurred In Not
|Concurred In Not
Receded Not | Receded Not
Amend section 1, page 2, by deleting lines 6 through 40 and inserting:
“1 Clark $54,000 [$100,800 $84,000 $72,000 $72,000 $72,000 $72,000 $72,000]
$155,745 $134,263 $95,760 $95,760 $95,760 $95,760 $95,760
2 Washoe 39,600 [96,000 78,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000]
137,485 110,632 87,780 87,780 87,780 87,780 87,780
3 Carson City 18,000 [72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 -------- 51,360 --------]
98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 -------- 68,309 --------
Churchill 18,000 [72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 -------- --------]
98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 -------- --------
Douglas 18,000 [72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 -------- --------]
98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 -------- --------
Elko 18,000 [72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 51,360 --------]
98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 68,309 --------
Humboldt 18,000 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 68,309 --------
Lyon 18,000 [72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 -------- --------]
98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 -------- --------
Nye 18,000 [72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 51,360 --------]
98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 68,309 --------
[4 Humboldt 18,000 68,340 54,000 42,840 42,840 42,840 42,840 --------]
4 Lander 18,000 [68,340 54,000 42,840 42,840 42,840 42,840 --------]
93,223 73,662 56,977 56,977 56,977 56,977 --------
White Pine 18,000 [68,340 54,000 42,840 42,840 42,840 42,840 --------]
93,223 73,662 56,977 56,977 56,977 56,977 --------
5 Eureka 15,240 [60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
Lincoln 15,240 [60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 38,400 --------]
82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 51,072 --------
Mineral 15,240 [60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
Pershing 15,240 [60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
Storey 15,240 82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
6 Esmeralda 12,000 [47,880 38,400 33,600 33,600 33,600 -------- --------]
65,314 52,382 44,688 44,688 44,688 -------- --------
[Storey 15,240 47,880 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 2, a board of county commissioners, by a vote of the majority of the board, may set the annual salary for the county commissioners of that county at a rate higher than the salary provided pursuant to subsection 2. A board of county commissioners is not limited in the number of times that it may raise the salary of the county commissioners for that county.”.
Amend the bill as a whole by deleting sections 2 through 6 and adding new sections designated sections 2 through 5, following section 1, to read as follows:
“Sec. 2. Except as otherwise provided in section 3 of this act, each county shall commence payment of the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table of annual salaries contained in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, on July 1, 2003.
Sec. 3. 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, a board of county commissioners may apply to the Committee on Local Government Finance for a waiver from the requirement to increase the annual salaries of elected officers of the county to the annual salaries set forth in the table contained in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, if the board determines that the financial resources of the county are insufficient to pay those increased annual salaries in Fiscal Year 2003-2004. The Committee on Local Government Finance shall grant such a waiver if it finds that the financial resources of the county are insufficient to pay those increased annual salaries in Fiscal Year 2003-2004.
2. A board of county commissioners that has been granted a waiver for a fiscal year may apply to the Committee on Local Government Finance for an additional waiver for the next consecutive fiscal year if it finds that the financial resources of the county continue to be insufficient to pay the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act. There is no limitation on the number of waivers for consecutive fiscal years that the board of county commissioners may be granted if the board of county commissioners finds that the financial resources of the county continue to be insufficient to pay the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, in that fiscal year.
3. After commencing payment of the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, a board of county commissioners may not apply for a waiver in any subsequent fiscal year.
4. The increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, must not be paid retroactively for a period to which a waiver granted pursuant to subsection 1 is applicable.
Sec. 4. The provisions of subsection 1 of NRS 354.599 do not apply to any additional expenses of a local government that are related to the provisions of this act.
Sec. 5. This act becomes effective upon July 1, 2003.”.
Amend the title of the bill, second line, by deleting:
“district attorneys and sheriffs;” and inserting:
“certain elected county officers; providing that a board of county commissioners may vote to raise the annual salary for a county commissioner of that county;”.
Amend the summary of the bill to read as follows:
“SUMMARY—Increases compensation of certain elected county officers. (BDR 20‑163)”.