Adoption of this amendment will MAINTAIN an unfunded mandate not requested by the affected local government to SB53 R1 (§§ 1, 2).
ASSEMBLY ACTION Initial and Date |SENATE ACTION Initial and Date
Adopted Lost | Adopted Lost
Concurred In Not |Concurred In Not
Receded Not | Receded Not
Amend section 1, page 2, by deleting lines 6 through 39 and inserting:
“1 Clark [$54,000 $100,800 $84,000 $72,000 $72,000 $72,000 $72,000 $72,000]
$71,820 $155,745 $134,263 $95,760 $95,760 $95,760 $95,760 $95,760
2 Washoe [39,600 96,000 78,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000]
52,668 137,485 110,632 87,780 87,780 87,780 87,780 87,780
3 Carson City [18,000 72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 -------- 51,360 --------]
23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 -------- 68,309 --------
Churchill [18,000 72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 -------- --------]
23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 -------- --------
Douglas [18,000 72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 -------- --------]
23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 -------- --------
Elko [18,000 72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 51,360 --------]
23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 68,309 --------
Humboldt 23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 68,309 --------
Lyon [18,000 72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 -------- --------]
23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 -------- --------
Nye [18,000 72,360 60,000 51,360 51,360 51,360 51,360 --------]
23,940 98,707 81,846 68,309 68,309 68,309 68,309 --------
[4 Humboldt 18,000 68,340 54,000 42,840 42,840 42,840 42,840 --------]
4 Lander [18,000 68,340 54,000 42,840 42,840 42,840 42,840 --------]
23,940 93,223 73,662 56,977 56,977 56,977 56,977 --------
White Pine [18,000 68,340 54,000 42,840 42,840 42,840 42,840 --------]
23,940 93,223 73,662 56,977 56,977 56,977 56,977 --------
5 Eureka [15,240 60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
20,269 82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
Lincoln [15,240 60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 38,400 --------]
20,269 82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 51,072 --------
Mineral [15,240 60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
20,269 82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
Pershing [15,240 60,300 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]
20,269 82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
Storey 20,269 82,256 58,929 51,072 51,072 51,072 -------- --------
6 Esmeralda [12,000 47,880 38,400 33,600 33,600 33,600 -------- --------]
15,960 65,314 52,382 44,688 44,688 44,688 -------- --------
[Storey 15,240 47,880 43,200 38,400 38,400 38,400 -------- --------]”.
Amend the bill as a whole by deleting sections 2 through 6 and adding new sections designated sections 2 through 5, following section 1, to read as follows:
“Sec. 2. Except as otherwise provided in section 3 of this act, each county shall commence payment of the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table of annual salaries contained in NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, on July 1, 2003.
Sec. 3. 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, a board of county commissioners may apply to the Committee on Local Government Finance for a waiver from the requirement to increase the annual salaries of elected officers of the county to the annual salaries set forth in the table contained in NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, if the board determines that the financial resources of the county are insufficient to pay those increased annual salaries in Fiscal Year 2003-2004. The Committee on Local Government Finance shall grant such a waiver if it finds that the financial resources of the county are insufficient to pay those increased annual salaries in Fiscal Year 2003-2004.
2. A board of county commissioners that has been granted a waiver for a fiscal year may apply to the Committee on Local Government Finance for an additional waiver for the next consecutive fiscal year if it finds that the financial resources of the county continue to be insufficient to pay the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act. There is no limitation on the number of waivers for consecutive fiscal years that the board of county commissioners may be granted if the board of county commissioners finds that the financial resources of the county continue to be insufficient to pay the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, in that fiscal year.
3. After commencing payment of the increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, a board of county commissioners may not apply for a waiver in any subsequent fiscal year.
4. The increased annual salaries of the elected officers of the county set forth in the table contained in NRS 245.043, as amended by section 1 of this act, must not be paid retroactively for a period to which a waiver granted pursuant to subsection 1 is applicable.
Sec. 4. The provisions of subsection 1 of NRS 354.599 do not apply to any additional expenses of a local government that are related to the provisions of this act.
Sec. 5. This act becomes effective upon July 1, 2003.”.
Amend the title of the bill, second line, by deleting:
“district attorneys and sheriffs;” and inserting:
“elected county officers;”.
Amend the summary of the bill to read as follows:
“SUMMARY—Increases compensation of elected county officers. (BDR 20‑21)”.