Senate
Joint Resolution No. 4–Committee on
Natural Resources
(On
Behalf of the Legislative Committee
on Public
Lands’ Subcommittee on Wilderness and
Wilderness Study Areas)
February 11, 2003
____________
Referred to Committee on Natural Resources
SUMMARY—Urges Nevada Congressional Delegation and Congress to take certain actions concerning wilderness areas and wilderness study areas. (BDR R‑715)
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No.
Effect on the State: No.
~
EXPLANATION
– Matter in bolded italics is new; matter
between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Green numbers along left margin indicate location on the printed bill (e.g., 5-15 indicates page 5, line 15).
Senate Joint RESOLUTION—Urging the Nevada Congressional Delegation and Congress to take certain actions concerning wilderness areas and wilderness study areas.
1-1 Whereas, The provisions of 16 U.S.C. §§ 1131 et seq.,
1-2 commonly referred to as the Wilderness Act, establish the National
1-3 Wilderness Preservation System, which consists of areas of federal
1-4 public land that are designated by Congress as wilderness areas; and
1-5 Whereas, Congress has designated approximately 1.7 million
1-6 acres of certain federal public lands in Nevada as wilderness areas;
1-7 and
1-8 Whereas, If an area of federal public land is designated as a
1-9 wilderness area, it must be managed in a manner that preserves the
1-10 wilderness character of the area and ensures that the area remains
1-11 unimpaired for future use and enjoyment as a wilderness area; and
1-12 Whereas, In conjunction with the provisions of the Wilderness
1-13 Act, the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of the
2-1 Interior manages approximately 5 million acres of federal public
2-2 lands in Nevada identified as wilderness study areas; and
2-3 Whereas, Until a wilderness study area is designated by
2-4 Congress as a wilderness area or released, the wilderness study area
2-5 must be managed in a manner that does not impair its suitability for
2-6 preservation as a wilderness area; and
2-7 Whereas, Because a considerable amount of federal public
2-8 land in Nevada has been designated as wilderness areas or identified
2-9 as wilderness study areas and because such designation or
2-10 identification imposes significant restrictions concerning the
2-11 management and use of such land, including land used for mining,
2-12 ranching and recreation, the Legislative Commission appointed a
2-13 subcommittee in 2001 to conduct an interim study of wilderness
2-14 areas and wilderness study areas in this state; and
2-15 Whereas, During the 2001-2002 legislative interim, the
2-16 subcommittee met several times throughout this state and facilitated
2-17 important and wide-ranging discussions among many agencies,
2-18 organizations and persons with diverse interests, perspectives and
2-19 expertise concerning wilderness areas and wilderness study areas;
2-20 and
2-21 Whereas, The subcommittee received a great deal of valuable
2-22 input from those agencies, organizations and persons, including
2-23 many valuable recommendations for the Nevada Congressional
2-24 Delegation and Congress to consider in addressing the issues
2-25 concerning wilderness areas and wilderness study areas in a
2-26 responsible, reasonable and fair manner; now, therefore, be it
2-27 Resolved by the Senate and Assembly of the State of
2-28 Nevada, Jointly, That the members of the Nevada Legislature
2-29 urge the Nevada Congressional Delegation to work with all
2-30 interested Nevadans, land managers, affected parties, local
2-31 governments, special interest organizations and members of the
2-32 American public in a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect to
2-33 address issues concerning the designation of wilderness areas in
2-34 Nevada; and be it further
2-35 Resolved, That the members of the Nevada Legislature urge
2-36 Congress to:
2-37 1. Encourage education at all levels of government and of all
2-38 affected parties to ensure that facts are accurately presented when
2-39 wilderness issues are debated and that the applicable laws are
2-40 properly interpreted when officials carry out legislation concerning
2-41 wilderness areas and wilderness study areas;
2-42 2. Require the development of accurate, consensus-based maps
2-43 for boundaries of wilderness areas and wilderness study areas using
2-44 technologies such as Geographic Information Systems;
3-1 3. Oppose the creation of buffer zones around wilderness areas
3-2 and instead support the requirement of clear and concise boundaries
3-3 based on recognizable features on the ground, including, without
3-4 limitation, roads and established drainage routes;
3-5 4. Support efforts to ensure that existing roads are not closed to
3-6 create wilderness areas;
3-7 5. Support the implementation of appropriate measures,
3-8 including, without limitation, the use of roads, to ensure that persons
3-9 who are elderly or have a disability have continued access to
3-10 wilderness areas;
3-11 6. Support the preservation of roads that do not appear on a
3-12 map and may not have been documented but that have historically
3-13 been used to allow persons access to private property;
3-14 7. For the purpose of allowing ranchers access to water
3-15 diversions located near wilderness areas or wilderness study areas,
3-16 support the use of “cherry-stem” roads, which are dead-end roads
3-17 that would geographically extend into wilderness areas but are
3-18 excluded from designation as parts of wilderness areas because the
3-19 boundaries of the wilderness areas are drawn around and just
3-20 beyond the edges of such roads;
3-21 8. Specifically outline and guarantee all preexisting rights of
3-22 ranchers concerning grazing permits, water permits and access to
3-23 land and water necessary for ranching via “cherry-stem” roads in
3-24 any legislation concerning wilderness areas and wilderness study
3-25 areas;
3-26 9. Support the use of appropriately managed grazing and
3-27 logging as integral tools for reducing potential fire danger in
3-28 wilderness areas and wilderness study areas;
3-29 10. Consider future population growth and urban expansion
3-30 when designating wilderness areas in Nevada, as Nevada has been
3-31 the state with the highest percentage population growth in recent
3-32 years and public lands in Nevada are increasingly impacted by
3-33 human activity and development;
3-34 11. Support the designation of the area of approximately 1,800
3-35 acres of land known as Marble Canyon, which is adjacent to the Mt.
3-36 Moriah Wilderness Area and which appears to have been
3-37 inadvertently excluded from the Nevada Wilderness Protection Act
3-38 of 1989, Public Law 101-195, as a wilderness area;
3-39 12. Support national and state legislation which explicitly
3-40 requires that when a decision is made in the public land use
3-41 planning process which will affect economic activity on public land,
3-42 consideration must be given as to the effects of the decision on
3-43 communities that are dependent on natural resources;
3-44 13. Hold extensive hearings in Washington, D.C., and in
3-45 Nevada before making any changes to the designation of wilderness
4-1 areas in Nevada or the identification of wilderness study areas in
4-2 Nevada or any other changes concerning public lands in Nevada;
4-3 14. Use a collaborative process when designating a wilderness
4-4 study area as a wilderness area; and
4-5 15. Support precise specification of the activities that are
4-6 authorized within wilderness areas and wilderness study areas; and
4-7 be it further
4-8 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate prepare and
4-9 transmit a copy of this resolution to the Vice President of the United
4-10 States as the presiding officer of the Senate, the Speaker of the
4-11 House of Representatives and each member of the Nevada
4-12 Congressional Delegation; and be it further
4-13 Resolved, That this resolution becomes effective upon
4-14 passage.
4-15 H