MINUTES OF THE meeting
of the
Assembly Committee on Ways and Means
AND THE
Senate Committee on Finance
JOINT Subcommittee on Higher Education/CIP
Seventy-Second Session
May 26, 2003
The Assembly Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance, Joint Subcommittee on Higher Education/CIP, was called to order at 5:42 p.m., on Monday, May 26, 2003. Chairman Morse Arberry Jr. presided in Room 3137 of the Legislative Building, Carson City, Nevada. Exhibit A is the Agenda. Exhibit B is the Guest List. All exhibits are available and on file at the Research Library of the Legislative Counsel Bureau.
Assembly COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mr. Morse Arberry Jr., Chairman
Mr. Walter Andonov
Mrs. Dawn Gibbons
Ms. Chris Giunchigliani
Mr. David Goldwater
Mr. Richard Perkins
Senate COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
Senator William J. Raggio
Senator Raymond D. Rawson
Senator Barbara Cegavske
Senator Bernice Mathews
COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT:
None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mark Stevens, Assembly Fiscal Analyst
Gary Ghiggeri, Senate Fiscal Analyst
Rick Combs, Deputy Fiscal Analyst
Carol Thomsen, Committee Secretary
Connie Davis, Committee Secretary
Chairman Arberry called the meeting to order and asked Gary Ghiggeri, Senate Fiscal Analyst, Fiscal Analysis Division, Legislative Counsel Bureau (LCB), to commence with the presentation regarding the projects within the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Mr. Ghiggeri referenced the packet entitled, “CIP Joint Subcommittee Recommended CIP Program for the 2003-05 Biennium,” Exhibit C, which compared the Governor’s recommendations and those of the Subcommittee, and was provided to the Subcommittee for its concurrence and/or review.
Mr. Ghiggeri explained the differences depicted in Exhibit C:
Mr. Ghiggeri stated that completed his explanation regarding the construction projects. He called the Subcommittee’s attention to the last two pages of Exhibit C entitled, “Priority of Maintenance Projects,” and explained that some adjustments had been made based on recommendations by the Subcommittee. The shaded projects on that list were either low on the priority list, or were funded for construction costs in FY2006, and had been recommended for elimination at the present time.
Chairman Arberry referenced additional CIP projects that would be added to the list as depicted in Exhibit D entitled, “CIP Additions,” which included:
Chairman Arberry asked whether there were comments from the Subcommittee regarding the additional CIP projects. Ms. Giunchigliani pointed out that the breakout for Project Number 03-C99L would be $1.5 million for the study and design, and $200,000 for construction of the embalming facility and the plasticization lab.
Senator Raggio noted that if the Subcommittee’s recommendations were followed for the projects listed in Exhibit C, it would free up the bonding authority to accommodate the additional CIP projects as depicted by Exhibit D. The funding would remain within the 16-cent state property tax rate that was recommended by the Governor and, perhaps, might be somewhat less. Mr. Ghiggeri concurred that it would be below the 16-cent tax rate.
Senator Rawson reiterated that the additional projects for southern Nevada would include the projects for the renovation of the former Mesquite High School in Mesquite; the study and design of the UNR Medical School heart transplant facility, construction of the embalming facility and plasticization lab in Las Vegas; and the security system and equipment upgrades at various campuses of the CCSN. Senator Rawson explained that the Oral Health Clinic project for the Great Basin College in Elko would operate under the auspices of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV).
Senator Cegavske asked for clarification regarding the “other” funding sources referenced in the exhibits. Mr. Ghiggeri reported that “other” funding would include Highway Fund money and private funds raised by the UCCSN; he noted that some internal service funds were funded via the agencies. Senator Cegavske asked whether any General Fund money would be utilized. Mr. Ghiggeri replied that no General Fund money would be utilized. Senator Cegavske noted that the projects would be funded via the 1‑cent increase in property tax recommended by the Governor, which had not yet passed. Mr. Ghiggeri explained that, historically, the property tax levy would be included in the Capital Improvement bill. In order to stay under the 1-cent increase, Mr. Ghiggeri believed the projects listed would have to be reduced by $60 million.
Senator Cegavske asked why some of the improvement projects at the Caliente Youth Center had been eliminated, as depicted in Exhibit C. Mr. Ghiggeri advised that some of those projects were very low on the priority list compiled by the State Public Works Board (SPWB). Also, the construction of those projects was not scheduled to begin until FY2006 when, hopefully, the state would have surplus cash to fund the routine maintenance projects rather than bonding those projects for 20 years. Senator Cegavske asked why some of the original projects on Exhibit C had not been addressed while others had been added via the CIP Additions list, Exhibit D.
Senator Raggio commented that for quite some time it had been recognized that the state retained only 15 cents in property tax for the purpose of CIP projects, and legislators had recognized that there would come a time when augmentation of the state’s portion of the property tax for that purpose would be necessary. Senator Raggio believed it was time to take such action and also believed that adding 1-cent to the property tax for the state would be appropriate and prudent action by the Legislature. Senator Raggio hoped that in the future the state would again find itself in a situation where it had adequate revenue from property tax and would not be required to use bonding for maintenance and retrofitting projects.
Mr. Ghiggeri referenced the Memorandum of May 1, 2003, from Evan Dale, Deputy Manager, SPWB, regarding sunset extensions, which requested an extension on reversions for CIP projects from 1997 and 1999, Exhibit E. If agreeable with the Subcommittee, Mr. Ghiggeri stated those projects would be included when drafting the Capital Improvement bill. Senator Raggio asked whether that action would extend the appropriations previously approved in the years indicated in Exhibit E, or would it add to the cost of the projects. Mr. Ghiggeri replied that it would not add to the cost unless there were cost overruns. The request would extend the reversion date due to time delays in completing the projects. Senator Raggio stated that the Subcommittee would require assurance from the SPWB that the projects were still viable and were within project funding levels.
Daniel O’Brien, Manager, SPWB, assured the Subcommittee that it was necessary to extend the projects listed in Exhibit E, and the SPWB would focus on completion of those projects. He explained that the list comprised the projects that required additional time to complete. According to Mr. O’Brien, the SPWB wanted to keep the Lied Library and the Veterans’ Home projects open because of ongoing litigation.
Chairman Arberry informed the Subcommittee that Project Number 03-P12L, funding for the design of the UNLV Student Services Center in an amount not to exceed $500,000, had inadvertently been omitted from the CIP Additions list, Exhibit D. He assured the Subcommittee that the project had simply been omitted from the list and would not represent additional funding.
Chairman Arberry indicated that he would accept a motion.
SENATOR RAGGIO MOVED TO APPROVE THE SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CIP PROJECTS AS DELINEATED IN EXHIBIT C, AND WITH THE BONDING AUTHORITY THAT ACTION WOULD FREE UP, TO ADD THE PROJECTS REFERENCED ON THE CIP ADDITIONS LIST, EXHIBIT D, AS FOLLOWS: 03‑C91L, DRI; 03-C92L, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; 03-C94L, UNR; 03-C95L, UNR; 03-96L, CCSN; 03-C97L, CCSN; 03-C98L, GBC; 03-C99L, UNR; 03-P10L, UNR; AND 03-P11L, UNR; ALONG WITH $500,000 FOR PROJECT NUMBER 03-P12L, UNLV, WHICH HAD BEEN OMITTED FROM THE LIST. THE TOTAL BONDING AUTHORITY WOULD BE $12,750,000 AND THE AMOUNT OF OTHER FUNDING WOULD BE $200,000.
SPEAKER PERKINS SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED WITH SENATOR CEGAVSKE AND ASSEMBLYMAN ANDONOV VOTING NO.
********
Senator Raggio believed that a second motion would be necessary regarding the extension of reversions referenced in Exhibit E.
SENATOR RAGGIO MOVED TO APPROVE THE SUNSET EXTENSIONS REQUESTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC WORKS BOARD AND EXTEND THE APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PROJECTS DELINEATED IN EXHIBIT E.
ASSEMBLYWOMAN GIUNCHIGLIANI SECONDED THE MOTION.
THE MOTION CARRIED WITH SENATOR CEGAVSKE AND ASSEMBLYMAN ANDONOV VOTING NO.
********
Mr. O’Brien informed the Subcommittee that there had been some discussion regarding a possible federal grant for Project Number 03-C6, new state emergency operations center, Exhibit C. The Emergency Management Division had applied for an $8 million matching federal grant, and if that were approved $4 million would be required in matching state funds. Mr. O’Brien indicated that he wanted the Subcommittee to be aware of that situation.
With no further business to come before the subcommittee, Chairman Arberry adjourned the hearing at 6:08 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
Carol Thomsen
Committee Secretary
APPROVED BY:
Assemblyman Morse Arberry Jr., Chairman
DATE:
Senator William J. Raggio, Chairman
DATE: